Paper · 2015 · Journal of Environmental Science and Natural Resources

Effect of Seed Treatment on Seedling Health of Chili

MZ Alam; I Hamim; MA Ali; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effect of seed treatment on seedling health of chili (BARI Morich 1) was studied at Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh, Bangladesh. BAU Bio-fungicide (3% of seed weight), chitosan (1% solution), thiovit (0.3% of seed weight), compressed moist heat (54ºC for 15 minutes), neem leaf extract (1:1 w/v), garlic clove extract (1:3 w/v), ginger extract (1:2 w/v) and allamonda leaf extract (1:1 w/v) were employed as seed treating agents. The treated seeds were placed on moistened blotter paper. Data were recorded on percent germination, production of percent healthy seedling and seedling vigour of chili. The results of seed health testing showed that, five different seed borne fungi viz. Colletotrichum capsici, Curvularia lunata, Rhizopus stolonifer, Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium moniliforme were found to be associated with the tested chili seed samples. Among these fungi, Curvularia lunata was the most prevalent one which was followed by Rhizopus stolonifer, Colletotrichum capsici, Fusarium moniliforme and Aspergillus flavus. All the seed treating agents were found to be effective compared to control in controlling seed borne fungi for the blotter method. The highest percentage of germination (93.33%) was recorded when the seeds of BARI Morich 1 were treated with BAU Bio-fungicide, whereas the lowest percentage of germination (61.33%) was recorded in case of untreated seeds. The highest percentage of healthy seedling (95.33%) was recorded when the seeds were treated with BAU Bio-fungicide and allamonda leaf extracts, whereas the lowest percentage of healthy seedling (59.00%) was recorded in case of untreated seeds. The highest vigour index (681.59) was recorded when the seeds were treated with neem leaf extracts, whereas the lowest vigour index (214.66) was recorded in case of untreated seeds.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jesnr.v7i1.22167 J. Environ. Sci. & Natural Resources, 7(1): 177-181 2014

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five seed-borne fungi were associated with tested chili seeds.

Taxon
chilie0
Interactor
Colletotrichum capsiciColletotrichum truncatume0pathogen
Outcome
seed borne fungie0

Verbatim

e0

“five different seed borne fungi viz. Colletotrichum capsici, Curvularia lunata, Rhizopus stolonifer, Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium moniliforme were found to be associated with the tested chili seed samples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Curvularia lunata was the most prevalent of the seed-borne fungi.

Taxon
Chilit0
Interactor
Curvularia lunataCurvularia lunatae0pathogen
Outcome
Curvularia lunata was the most prevalente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Curvularia lunata
Curvularia lunata · InteractorMedmyco at English Wikipedia · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chili”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Curvularia lunata was the most prevalent one which was followed by Rhizopus stolonifer, Colletotrichum capsici, Fusarium moniliforme and Aspergillus flavus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All seed treatments controlled seed-borne fungi compared with the control.

Taxon
Chilit0
Treatment
seed treating agentse0
Outcome
controlling seed borne fungie0
Direction
effectivee0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“Chili”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the seed treating agents were found to be effective compared to control in controlling seed borne fungi for the blotter method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BAU Bio-fungicide treatment produced the highest germination, 93.33%, versus 61.33% for untreated seeds.

Taxon
Chilit0
Material
BARI Morich 1e0
Treatment
BAU Bio-fungicidee0
Outcome
percentage of germinatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
93.33%e0
Qualifier
61.33%e0
Comparator
untreated seedse0

Verbatim

t0

“Chili”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest percentage of germination (93.33%) was recorded when the seeds of BARI Morich 1 were treated with BAU Bio-fungicide, whereas the lowest percentage of germination (61.33%) was recorded in case of untreated seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1409 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BAU Bio-fungicide produced the highest healthy-seedling percentage, 95.33%.

Taxon
Chilit0
Treatment
BAU Bio-fungicidee0
Outcome
percentage of healthy seedlinge0
Direction
higheste0
Value
95.33%e0
Qualifier
59.00%e0
Comparator
untreated seedse0

Verbatim

t0

“Chili”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest percentage of healthy seedling (95.33%) was recorded when the seeds were treated with BAU Bio-fungicide and allamonda leaf extracts, whereas the lowest percentage of healthy seedling (59.00%) was recorded in case of untreated seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allamonda leaf extract produced the highest healthy-seedling percentage, 95.33%.

Taxon
Chilit0
Treatment
allamonda leaf extractse0
Outcome
percentage of healthy seedlinge0
Direction
higheste0
Value
95.33%e0
Comparator
untreated seedse0

Verbatim

t0

“Chili”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest percentage of healthy seedling (95.33%) was recorded when the seeds were treated with BAU Bio-fungicide and allamonda leaf extracts, whereas the lowest percentage of healthy seedling (59.00%) was recorded in case of untreated seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem leaf extract produced the highest vigour index, 681.59, versus 214.66 for untreated seeds.

Taxon
Chilit0
Treatment
neem leaf extractse0
Outcome
vigour indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
681.59e0
Qualifier
214.66e0
Comparator
untreated seedse0

Verbatim

t0

“Chili”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest vigour index (681.59) was recorded when the seeds were treated with neem leaf extracts, whereas the lowest vigour index (214.66) was recorded in case of untreated seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1836 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 23 positive, 7 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

biocontrol · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.