Paper · 2021 · Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace

Identification of the effectiveness of associative rhizobacteria in spring wheat cultivation

Kolesnikov, L.E.; Belimov, A.A.; Kudryavtseva, E.Y.; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
5
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The maximum increase in wheat yield (by 67% to the control), associated with a decrease in the root rot development by 19%, an increase in the productive bushiness by 18%, the spike weight by 26%, in the grains number per spike by 8% was noted when using the Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11; the strain effect on leaf diseases was insignificant (2–5%). The plants differed in the maximum changes (to control) in the total bushiness by 59%, the plants vegetative part weight by 27%, the flag leaf area by 21%, the pre-flag leaf area by 28%, the roots numbers and weight by 20% and 62%. After plants treatments with the Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137, the wheat maturation period was reduced by 9% (to the control), wheat yield increased by 58% due to a decrease in the development of root rot and septoria by 18%, the yellow rust pustules area by 44%; the productive bushiness and plant height increased by 25% and 19%, the plant vegetative weight by 21%, the spike length by 4%. The most expressed protective and growth-stimulating effect was shown by the Sphingomonas sp. K1B, which caused a maximum decrease (to the control) in the root rot and yellow rust development by 22% and 7%, the strips length by 22%, the pustules number in the strip by 29%, brown rust by 10%, septoria by 11%. Wheat plants were characterized by a large number and length of roots by 17% and 13%, root weight by 49%, a maximum increase in the nodal roots number and length by 15% and 17%; total bushiness by 34.5%; a maximum increase in plant vegetative weight by 37%; the spike length by 3%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed wheat yield by 67% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11e0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
67%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum increase in wheat yield (by 67% to the control), associated with a decrease in the root rot development by 19%, an increase in the productive bushiness by 18%, the spike weight by 26%, in the grains number per spike by 8% was noted when using the Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed root rot development by 19% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11e0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
root rot developmente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
19%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum increase in wheat yield (by 67% to the control), associated with a decrease in the root rot development by 19%, an increase in the productive bushiness by 18%, the spike weight by 26%, in the grains number per spike by 8% was noted when using the Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed productive bushiness by 18% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11e0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
productive bushinesse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
18%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum increase in wheat yield (by 67% to the control), associated with a decrease in the root rot development by 19%, an increase in the productive bushiness by 18%, the spike weight by 26%, in the grains number per spike by 8% was noted when using the Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed spike weight by 26% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11e0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
spike weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
26%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum increase in wheat yield (by 67% to the control), associated with a decrease in the root rot development by 19%, an increase in the productive bushiness by 18%, the spike weight by 26%, in the grains number per spike by 8% was noted when using the Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed grains number per spike by 8% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11e0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
grains number per spikee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
8%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum increase in wheat yield (by 67% to the control), associated with a decrease in the root rot development by 19%, an increase in the productive bushiness by 18%, the spike weight by 26%, in the grains number per spike by 8% was noted when using the Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The strain had an insignificant effect on leaf diseases of 2–5%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
straine1
Outcome
leaf diseasese1
Value
2–5%e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“the strain effect on leaf diseases was insignificant (2–5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–351 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plants showed a maximum change in total bushiness of 59% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
total bushinesse2
Value
59%e2
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“The plants differed in the maximum changes (to control) in the total bushiness by 59%, the plants vegetative part weight by 27%, the flag leaf area by 21%, the pre-flag leaf area by 28%, the roots numbers and weight by 20% and 62%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–583 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plants showed a maximum change in plants vegetative part weight of 27% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
plants vegetative part weighte2
Value
27%e2
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“The plants differed in the maximum changes (to control) in the total bushiness by 59%, the plants vegetative part weight by 27%, the flag leaf area by 21%, the pre-flag leaf area by 28%, the roots numbers and weight by 20% and 62%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–583 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plants showed a maximum change in flag leaf area of 21% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
flag leaf areae2
Value
21%e2
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“The plants differed in the maximum changes (to control) in the total bushiness by 59%, the plants vegetative part weight by 27%, the flag leaf area by 21%, the pre-flag leaf area by 28%, the roots numbers and weight by 20% and 62%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–583 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plants showed a maximum change in pre-flag leaf area of 28% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
pre-flag leaf areae2
Value
28%e2
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“The plants differed in the maximum changes (to control) in the total bushiness by 59%, the plants vegetative part weight by 27%, the flag leaf area by 21%, the pre-flag leaf area by 28%, the roots numbers and weight by 20% and 62%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–583 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plants showed a maximum change in roots numbers of 20% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
roots numberse2
Value
20%e2
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“The plants differed in the maximum changes (to control) in the total bushiness by 59%, the plants vegetative part weight by 27%, the flag leaf area by 21%, the pre-flag leaf area by 28%, the roots numbers and weight by 20% and 62%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–583 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plants showed a maximum change in weight of 62% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
weighte2
Value
62%e2
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“The plants differed in the maximum changes (to control) in the total bushiness by 59%, the plants vegetative part weight by 27%, the flag leaf area by 21%, the pre-flag leaf area by 28%, the roots numbers and weight by 20% and 62%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed wheat maturation period by 9% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137e3
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137Pseudomonas fluorescense3symbiont
Outcome
wheat maturation periode3
Direction
reducede3
Value
9%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“After plants treatments with the Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137, the wheat maturation period was reduced by 9% (to the control), wheat yield increased by 58% due to a decrease in the development of root rot and septoria by 18%, the yellow rust pustules area by 44%; the productive bushiness and plant height increased by 25% and 19%, the plant vegetative weight by 21%, the spike length by 4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed wheat yield by 58% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137e3
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137Pseudomonas fluorescense3symbiont
Outcome
wheat yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
58%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“After plants treatments with the Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137, the wheat maturation period was reduced by 9% (to the control), wheat yield increased by 58% due to a decrease in the development of root rot and septoria by 18%, the yellow rust pustules area by 44%; the productive bushiness and plant height increased by 25% and 19%, the plant vegetative weight by 21%, the spike length by 4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed development of root rot by 18% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137e3
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137Pseudomonas fluorescense3symbiont
Outcome
development of root rote3
Direction
decreasee3
Value
18%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“After plants treatments with the Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137, the wheat maturation period was reduced by 9% (to the control), wheat yield increased by 58% due to a decrease in the development of root rot and septoria by 18%, the yellow rust pustules area by 44%; the productive bushiness and plant height increased by 25% and 19%, the plant vegetative weight by 21%, the spike length by 4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed septoria by 18% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137e3
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137Pseudomonas fluorescense3symbiont
Outcome
septoriae3
Direction
decreasee3
Value
18%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“After plants treatments with the Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137, the wheat maturation period was reduced by 9% (to the control), wheat yield increased by 58% due to a decrease in the development of root rot and septoria by 18%, the yellow rust pustules area by 44%; the productive bushiness and plant height increased by 25% and 19%, the plant vegetative weight by 21%, the spike length by 4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed yellow rust pustules area by 44% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137e3
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137Pseudomonas fluorescense3symbiont
Outcome
yellow rust pustules areae3
Direction
decreasee3
Value
44%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“After plants treatments with the Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137, the wheat maturation period was reduced by 9% (to the control), wheat yield increased by 58% due to a decrease in the development of root rot and septoria by 18%, the yellow rust pustules area by 44%; the productive bushiness and plant height increased by 25% and 19%, the plant vegetative weight by 21%, the spike length by 4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed productive bushiness by 25% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137e3
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137Pseudomonas fluorescense3symbiont
Outcome
productive bushinesse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
25%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“After plants treatments with the Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137, the wheat maturation period was reduced by 9% (to the control), wheat yield increased by 58% due to a decrease in the development of root rot and septoria by 18%, the yellow rust pustules area by 44%; the productive bushiness and plant height increased by 25% and 19%, the plant vegetative weight by 21%, the spike length by 4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed plant height by 19% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137e3
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137Pseudomonas fluorescense3symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte3
Direction
increasede3
Value
19%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“After plants treatments with the Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137, the wheat maturation period was reduced by 9% (to the control), wheat yield increased by 58% due to a decrease in the development of root rot and septoria by 18%, the yellow rust pustules area by 44%; the productive bushiness and plant height increased by 25% and 19%, the plant vegetative weight by 21%, the spike length by 4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed plant vegetative weight by 21% relative to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137e3
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137Pseudomonas fluorescense3symbiont
Outcome
plant vegetative weighte3
Direction
increasede3
Value
21%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“After plants treatments with the Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137, the wheat maturation period was reduced by 9% (to the control), wheat yield increased by 58% due to a decrease in the development of root rot and septoria by 18%, the yellow rust pustules area by 44%; the productive bushiness and plant height increased by 25% and 19%, the plant vegetative weight by 21%, the spike length by 4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–985 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.