Paper · 2023 · Eurasian Soil Science

Soil-Agrochemical Aspects of Remediation of Nickel-Contaminated Soil Using Growth-Promoting Rhizosphere Bacteria

V. P. Shabayev; V. E. Ostroumov

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In pot experiments, the effect of introduced rhizosphere bacteria promoting plant growth on the yield and chemical composition of spring wheat grown in humus horizon of the Luvic Retic Greyzemic Phaeozems (Loamic) artificially contaminated with a water-soluble nickel compound has been studied. Application of Pseudomonas fluorescens 20, P. fluorescens 21, and P. putida 23 bacteria increased plant resistance to elevated nickel concentration and increased yields, significantly reducing or completely eliminating heavy metal phytotoxicity. The resistance of plants to impact of nickel stress when using bacteria has been caused by: (a) stimulation of root growth and an increase of nickel accumulation in root system; (b) improvement of mineral nutrition of plants—an increase of uptake of biophilic elements from contaminated soil due to an increase in yield, in general, without significant changes in the content of most elements in plants, including grain. Application of bacteria increased uptake of nickel from soil by the aboveground organs of plants, thereby enhancing phytoextraction, soil purification from heavy metal, and, consequently, soil remediation. The distribution of nickel in soil in fractions isolated by the method of consecutive selective extractions has been determined. In the first half of the growing season, application of bacteria increased the content of nickel in soil, mainly in the exchangeable and specifically bound fractions and, to a lesser extent, in fractions associated with organic matter and ferruginous minerals, and decreased the content of the metal in the residual fraction. The increase of nickel accumulation in plants as a result of bacteria application corresponded to increased heavy metal content in soil, mostly in compounds associated with exchangeable and specifically bound fractions. At full maturity of plants, no significant changes were found in the fractional composition of Ni in soil. Application of bacteria can be recommended in the development of strategies for remediation of nickel-contaminated soils based on environmentally friendly technologies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each introduced bacterium increased wheat nickel resistance and yield.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens 20, P. fluorescens 21, and P. putida 23 bacteriae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens 20Pseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
plant resistance to elevated nickel concentration and increased yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Pseudomonas fluorescens 20, P. fluorescens 21, and P. putida 23 bacteria increased plant resistance to elevated nickel concentration and increased yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–472 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial application stimulated root growth and nickel accumulation in roots.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens 20, P. fluorescens 21, and P. putida 23 bacteriae1
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens 20Pseudomonas fluorescense1symbiont
Outcome
root growth and an increase of nickel accumulation in root systeme0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stimulation of root growth and an increase of nickel accumulation in root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–726 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of Pseudomonas fluorescens 20, P. fluorescens 21, and P. putida 23 bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–391 · show in text ↑
e2

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial application improved mineral nutrition and biophilic element uptake.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens 20, P. fluorescens 21, and P. putida 23 bacteriae1
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens 20Pseudomonas fluorescense1symbiont
Outcome
uptake of biophilic elementse0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improvement of mineral nutrition of plants—an increase of uptake of biophilic elements from contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–841 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of Pseudomonas fluorescens 20, P. fluorescens 21, and P. putida 23 bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–391 · show in text ↑
e2

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most element contents in wheat, including grain, did not change significantly.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
content of most elements in plantse0
Direction
without significant changese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without significant changes in the content of most elements in plants, including grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–969 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria increased aboveground nickel uptake and phytoextraction.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
bacteriae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens 20Pseudomonas fluorescense2symbiont
Outcome
uptake of nickel from soil by the aboveground organs of plantse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of bacteria increased uptake of nickel from soil by the aboveground organs of plants, thereby enhancing phytoextraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1102 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pseudomonas fluorescens 20, P. fluorescens 21, and P. putida 23 bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria increased exchangeable and specifically bound nickel fractions early in the season.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
bacteriae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens 20Pseudomonas fluorescense2symbiont
Outcome
content of nickel in soil, mainly in the exchangeable and specifically bound fractionse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of bacteria increased the content of nickel in soil, mainly in the exchangeable and specifically bound fractions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1471 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pseudomonas fluorescens 20, P. fluorescens 21, and P. putida 23 bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria increased nickel in organic matter and ferruginous mineral fractions to a lesser extent.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
bacteriae1
Outcome
fractions associated with organic matter and ferruginous mineralse0
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to a lesser extent, in fractions associated with organic matter and ferruginous minerals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1565 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of bacteria increased the content of nickel in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1410 · show in text ↑
e2

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria decreased nickel in the residual soil fraction.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
bacteriae1
Outcome
content of the metal in the residual fractione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased the content of the metal in the residual fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1630 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of bacteria increased the content of nickel in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1410 · show in text ↑
e2

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At maturity, soil nickel fractions showed no significant changes.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
full maturitye0
Outcome
fractional composition of Ni in soile0
Direction
no significant changese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At full maturity of plants, no significant changes were found in the fractional composition of Ni in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1852–1957 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend bacterial application for remediation strategies.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
Application of bacteriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of bacteria can be recommended in the development of strategies for remediation of nickel-contaminated soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1959–2079 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Pseudomonas putida · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Pseudomonas fluorescens · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

164 papers: 104 positive, 60 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

160 papers more in this group

See all 164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.