Paper · 2026 · Russian Journal of General Chemistry

Application of Innovative Microbiological Agents for Plant Protection and Growth Regulation in Soft Wheat Cultivation

I. I. Novikova; E. V. Popova; L. E. Kolesnikov; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The challenges of increasing crop productivity and improving harvest quality can be addressed by optimizing the phytosanitary status of agroecosystems and the application of effective and environmentally safe plant protection agents. This study investigated the effects of multifunctional biological preparations based on strains of antagonistic microorganisms of different taxonomic positions and their combinations with chitosan salicylate in the cultivation of spring soft wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). It was found that the application of multifunctional complexes based on strains of Bacillus subtilis, Streptomyces felleus S-8, Streptomyces sp. VIZR-18, and 0.1% chitosan salicylate significantly increased wheat productivity and yield (up to 147.8%) by increasing the number and length of primary and nodal roots, productive tillering, the number of spikelets, and the grain weight per spike. A significant reduction in plant disease incidence was observed: the biological efficacy against root rot was 50%, against Septoria leaf blotch 77.6%, and powdery mildew development was also significantly suppressed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The complexes significantly increased wheat productivity and yield by up to 147.8%.

Taxon
Soft Wheatt0
Treatment
multifunctional complexes based on strains of Bacillus subtilis, Streptomyces felleus S-8, Streptomyces sp. VIZR-18, and 0.1% chitosan salicylatee0
Outcome
wheat productivity and yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
up to 147.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Soft Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“the application of multifunctional complexes based on strains of Bacillus subtilis, Streptomyces felleus S-8, Streptomyces sp. VIZR-18, and 0.1% chitosan salicylate significantly increased wheat productivity and yield (up to 147.8%) by increasing the number and length of primary and nodal roots, productive tillering, the number of spikelets, and the grain weight per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The complexes increased the number and length of primary and nodal roots.

Taxon
Soft Wheatt0
Treatment
multifunctional complexes based on strains of Bacillus subtilis, Streptomyces felleus S-8, Streptomyces sp. VIZR-18, and 0.1% chitosan salicylatee0
Outcome
number and length of primary and nodal rootse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Soft Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“the application of multifunctional complexes based on strains of Bacillus subtilis, Streptomyces felleus S-8, Streptomyces sp. VIZR-18, and 0.1% chitosan salicylate significantly increased wheat productivity and yield (up to 147.8%) by increasing the number and length of primary and nodal roots, productive tillering, the number of spikelets, and the grain weight per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The complexes increased productive tillering, spikelet number and grain weight per spike.

Taxon
Soft Wheatt0
Treatment
multifunctional complexes based on strains of Bacillus subtilis, Streptomyces felleus S-8, Streptomyces sp. VIZR-18, and 0.1% chitosan salicylatee0
Outcome
productive tillering, the number of spikelets, and the grain weight per spikee0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Soft Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“the application of multifunctional complexes based on strains of Bacillus subtilis, Streptomyces felleus S-8, Streptomyces sp. VIZR-18, and 0.1% chitosan salicylate significantly increased wheat productivity and yield (up to 147.8%) by increasing the number and length of primary and nodal roots, productive tillering, the number of spikelets, and the grain weight per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The complexes achieved 50% biological efficacy against root rot.

Taxon
Soft Wheatt0
Treatment
biological efficacy against root rote0
Outcome
root rote0
Direction
reductione0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Soft Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“A significant reduction in plant disease incidence was observed: the biological efficacy against root rot was 50%, against Septoria leaf blotch 77.6%, and powdery mildew development was also significantly suppressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The complexes achieved 77.6% biological efficacy against Septoria leaf blotch.

Taxon
Soft Wheatt0
Treatment
biological efficacy against root rote0
Outcome
Septoria leaf blotche0
Direction
reductione0
Value
77.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Soft Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“A significant reduction in plant disease incidence was observed: the biological efficacy against root rot was 50%, against Septoria leaf blotch 77.6%, and powdery mildew development was also significantly suppressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Powdery mildew development was significantly suppressed.

Taxon
Soft Wheatt0
Outcome
powdery mildew developmente0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Soft Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“powdery mildew development was also significantly suppressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1124 · show in text ↑

Streptomyces · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chitosan · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.