Paper · 2015 · Figshare

Weed management through combined application of allelopathic crop water leachates and reduced doses of herbicide in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Iqbal, Zahid

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out at Cotton Research Sub Station, Piplan, Mianwali to determine appropriate combination of sorghum and brassica water extracts with reduced doses of paraquat (Gramoxon 20 SL), and pendimethalin (Stomp 330 E) for weed management in cotton. Combination of sorghum and brassica water leachates each at 20 L ha-1 and pendimethalin @ 0.417 kg a. i. ha-1 (1/3 dose) as pre-emergence reduced weed density of horse persulane was statistically alike to the brand dose of pendimethalin at 15, 40 and 60 DAS. The diminution in weed dry weight was also equal at 40 DAS while less at 60 DAS. The weed control with 1/3 dose of paraquat in combination with sorghum and brassica water leachates was equal to the full dose paraquat as directed post-emergence recorded at 60 DAS. The maximum seed cotton yield (2150 kg ha-1) was attained with Allelopathic crop water leachates combined with lower rates pendimethalin, while its brand dose @ 1.25 kg a. i. ha-1 produced lesser seed cotton yield (1850 kg a. i. ha-1). Economic and marginal analysis demonstrated that the treatment T6 was the most economical with highest net benefits of Rs.144297/- and marginal rate of return 3299.28% while T5 and T7 are uneconomical due to higher cost that vary and less net benefits .It can be concluded that combination of sorghum and brassica water leachates with 1/3 dose of pendimethalin as pre-emergence for controlling horse persulane in cotton is reasonable and therefore the herbicide dose can be reduced by 67%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined leachates and one-third pendimethalin dose reduced horse persulane density similarly to the full dose at 15, 40 and 60 DAS.

Treatment
Combination of sorghum and brassica water leachates each at 20 L ha-1 and pendimethalin @ 0.417 kg a. i. ha-1 (1/3 dose)e0
Interactor
horse persulanee0weed
Outcome
weed density of horse persulanee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
15, 40 and 60 DASe0
Comparator
brand dose of pendimethaline0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combination of sorghum and brassica water leachates each at 20 L ha-1 and pendimethalin @ 0.417 kg a. i. ha-1 (1/3 dose) as pre-emergence reduced weed density of horse persulane was statistically alike to the brand dose of pendimethalin at 15, 40 and 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed dry weight reduction was equal at 40 DAS but less at 60 DAS.

Outcome
weed dry weighte0
Direction
equale0
Qualifier
40 DAS while less at 60 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The diminution in weed dry weight was also equal at 40 DAS while less at 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–610 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One-third paraquat with leachates gave weed control equal to full-dose paraquat at 60 DAS.

Treatment
1/3 dose of paraquat in combination with sorghum and brassica water leachatese0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
equale0
Qualifier
60 DASe0
Comparator
full dose paraquate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weed control with 1/3 dose of paraquat in combination with sorghum and brassica water leachates was equal to the full dose paraquat as directed post-emergence recorded at 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leachates with lower-rate pendimethalin attained maximum seed cotton yield of 2150 kg ha-1.

Treatment
Allelopathic crop water leachates combined with lower rates pendimethaline0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2150 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
1850 kg a. i. ha-1e0
Comparator
brand dose @ 1.25 kg a. i. ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum seed cotton yield (2150 kg ha-1) was attained with Allelopathic crop water leachates combined with lower rates pendimethalin, while its brand dose @ 1.25 kg a. i. ha-1 produced lesser seed cotton yield (1850 kg a. i. ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 had the highest net benefits of Rs.144297/-.

Treatment
T6e0
Outcome
net benefitse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs.144297/-e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment T6 was the most economical with highest net benefits of Rs.144297/-”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 had a marginal rate of return of 3299.28%.

Treatment
T6e1
Outcome
marginal rate of returne0
Value
3299.28%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“marginal rate of return 3299.28%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1198 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treatment T6 was the most economical”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 was uneconomical because of higher variable cost and lower net benefits.

Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
uneconomicale0
Qualifier
higher cost that vary and less net benefitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T5 and T7 are uneconomical due to higher cost that vary and less net benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 was uneconomical because of higher variable cost and lower net benefits.

Treatment
T7e0
Outcome
uneconomicale0
Qualifier
higher cost that vary and less net benefitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T5 and T7 are uneconomical due to higher cost that vary and less net benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that leachates with one-third pendimethalin can control horse persulane in cotton and reduce herbicide dose by 67%.

Interactor
horse persulanee0weed
Outcome
herbicide dose can be reducede0
Value
67%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination of sorghum and brassica water leachates with 1/3 dose of pendimethalin as pre-emergence for controlling horse persulane in cotton is reasonable and therefore the herbicide dose can be reduced by 67%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1519 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

49 papers: 43 positive, 6 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Sorghum · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

paraquat · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

allelopathy · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.