Paper · 2018 · Planta Daninha

Herbicidal Potential of Sorghum and Brassica Against the Weeds of Cotton

O. FAROOQ; ATIQUE-UR-REHMAN; N. SARWAR; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Weed infestation is among the main factors which decrease cotton yield. Allelopathy has been well-documented as a phenomenon offering natural weed control in agro-ecosystems. An experiment was conducted to figure out the herbicidal potential of a mixture of sorghum and brassica water extracts (SBWE) against weeds in cotton. Combinations of SBWE each at 16 L ha-1 were sprayed alone and in combination in a tank mixed with and ¼ doses of both pendimethalin (0.625 and 0.416 kg a.i. ha-1) and S-metolachlor (1.075 and 0.716 kg a.i. ha-1). Recommended doses of pendimethalin (1.25 kg a.i. ha-1) and S-metolachlor (2.15 kg a.i. ha-1) were also sprayed for comparison. As control, a weedy check treatment where nothing was sprayed was also included in the experiment. Lower doses () of both herbicides in combination with SBWE gave approximately the same level of weed reduction and crop improvement as given by the recommended doses of herbicides. Furthermore, economic and marginal analysis showed that maximum net benefits were obtained in using allelopathic water extracts alone and in combination with lower rates of commercial herbicides. Thus, in conclusion, allelopathy can be employed for weed management and yield maximization in modern agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower herbicide doses combined with SBWE achieved approximately the same weed reduction as recommended doses.

Treatment
Lower doses () of both herbicides in combination with SBWEe0
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
weed reductione0
Direction
same levele0
Comparator
recommended doses of herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower doses () of both herbicides in combination with SBWE gave approximately the same level of weed reduction and crop improvement as given by the recommended doses of herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
e2

“against weeds in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower herbicide doses combined with SBWE achieved approximately the same crop improvement as recommended doses.

Treatment
Lower doses () of both herbicides in combination with SBWEe0
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
crop improvemente0
Direction
same levele0
Comparator
recommended doses of herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower doses () of both herbicides in combination with SBWE gave approximately the same level of weed reduction and crop improvement as given by the recommended doses of herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
e2

“against weeds in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allelopathic water extracts alone produced maximum net benefits.

Treatment
allelopathic water extracts alonee0
Outcome
net benefitse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum net benefits were obtained in using allelopathic water extracts alone and in combination with lower rates of commercial herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allelopathic water extracts combined with lower herbicide rates produced maximum net benefits.

Treatment
allelopathic water extracts alone and in combination with lower rates of commercial herbicidese0
Outcome
net benefitse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum net benefits were obtained in using allelopathic water extracts alone and in combination with lower rates of commercial herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude allelopathy can be used for weed management and yield maximization.

Treatment
allelopathye0
Outcome
weed management and yield maximizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allelopathy can be employed for weed management and yield maximization in modern agriculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑

Sorghum · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

botanical · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 35 positive, 1 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

herbicide · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 100 positive, 8 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

herbicide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 123 positive, 59 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

botanical · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

allelopathy · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.