Paper · 2015 · Sarhad Journal of Agriculture

Effect of Allelopathic Water Extract of Sorghum and Sunflower on Weed Mortality and Cotton Yield

Muhammad Nawaz Kandhro; Habib-Ur-Rehman Memon; Muhammad Ali Ansari; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sorghum and sunflower have been reported to contain several allelochemicals. Utilization of these allelochemicals is considered low-cost and natural sources for weed suppression. Field trials were undertaken at Cotton Section, Agriculture Research Institute, Tandojam Pakistan during summer 2010 and repeated during summer 2011 for validating the previous results. The experiments were laid out in three replicated randomized complete block design. The seed of cotton variety "Sindh-1" was sown through drilling in the 1 st week of May each year. The treatments consisted of: weedy check (no weeding), interculturing twice (30+60 DAS), Dual Gold 960-EC (S-metolachlor) @ 2.50 L ha - 1 , sorghum water extracts @ 15 L ha -1 (twice) and 25 L ha -1 (once and twice) and sunflower water extracts @ 15 L ha -1 (twice) and 25 L ha -1 (once and twice), sorghum water extract @ 15 L ha -1 +1.25 L ha -1 Dual Gold and sunflower water extract @ 15 L ha -1 +1.25 L ha -1 Dual Gold. In interculturing the land space in between two rows of crop plants was pulverized with the help of local tool spade. The statistical analysis of data showed that interculturing, Dual Gold, and sorghum and sunflower water extracts caused significant reduction of weeds and increased seedcotton yield as compared to weedy check. The combined application of sorghum @ 15 L ha -1 + Dual Gold @ 1.25 L ha -1 resulted in weeds mortality upto 66.6%, produced seedcotton yield of 3961.4 kg ha -1 and gave net benefit of Rs. 2,20,029. Sunflower applied @ 15 L ha -1 in integration with Dual Gold @ 1.25 L ha -1 showed weeds mortality of 65.5 %, resulted in seedcotton yield of 3949.7 kg ha -1 and net monetary benefit of Rs. 2,19,821. Sole application of Dual Gold @ 2.5 L ha -1 reduced weeds by 55.9%, produced seedcotton yield of 3212.7 kg ha -1 and net resulted in net benefit of Rs. 1,77,414. It is noteworthy that interculturing twice (30+60 DAS) caused maximum (67.7%) suppression of weeds, produced maximum plant height (117.0 cm) and seedcotton yield (3977.8 kg ha -1 ) but conferred less (Rs. 2,14,151) net monetary benefits as compared to obtained in sorghum + Dual Gold and sunflower + Dual Gold. Overall results suggested that maximum net income was recorded when sorghum water extract was applied in integration with Dual Gold. The combined application of sunflower with Dual Gold ranked second in monetary benefits. Interculturing twice was found less economical due to higher costs of labour. Hence, it can be inferred from the above results that Dual Gold dose can be reduced up to 50% in combination with sorghum or sunflower water extracts for effective and environment friendly weed management and enhancing cotton yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Interculturing significantly reduced weeds and increased seedcotton yield compared with the weedy check.

Treatment
interculturinge0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interculturing, Dual Gold, and sorghum and sunflower water extracts caused significant reduction of weeds and increased seedcotton yield as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Interculturing significantly increased seedcotton yield compared with the weedy check.

Treatment
interculturinge0
Outcome
seedcotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interculturing, Dual Gold, and sorghum and sunflower water extracts caused significant reduction of weeds and increased seedcotton yield as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual Gold significantly reduced weeds compared with the weedy check.

Treatment
Dual Golde0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interculturing, Dual Gold, and sorghum and sunflower water extracts caused significant reduction of weeds and increased seedcotton yield as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual Gold significantly increased seedcotton yield compared with the weedy check.

Treatment
Dual Golde0
Outcome
seedcotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interculturing, Dual Gold, and sorghum and sunflower water extracts caused significant reduction of weeds and increased seedcotton yield as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum water extracts significantly reduced weeds compared with the weedy check.

Treatment
sorghume0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interculturing, Dual Gold, and sorghum and sunflower water extracts caused significant reduction of weeds and increased seedcotton yield as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum water extracts significantly increased seedcotton yield compared with the weedy check.

Treatment
sorghume0
Outcome
seedcotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interculturing, Dual Gold, and sorghum and sunflower water extracts caused significant reduction of weeds and increased seedcotton yield as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower water extracts significantly reduced weeds compared with the weedy check.

Treatment
sunflower water extractse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interculturing, Dual Gold, and sorghum and sunflower water extracts caused significant reduction of weeds and increased seedcotton yield as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower water extracts significantly increased seedcotton yield compared with the weedy check.

Treatment
sunflower water extractse0
Outcome
seedcotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interculturing, Dual Gold, and sorghum and sunflower water extracts caused significant reduction of weeds and increased seedcotton yield as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum extract with Dual Gold produced 66.6% weed mortality.

Treatment
sorghum @ 15 L ha -1 + Dual Gold @ 1.25 L ha -1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weeds mortalitye0
Direction
uptoe0
Value
66.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of sorghum @ 15 L ha -1 + Dual Gold @ 1.25 L ha -1 resulted in weeds mortality upto 66.6%, produced seedcotton yield of 3961.4 kg ha -1 and gave net benefit of Rs. 2,20,029”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum extract with Dual Gold produced seedcotton yield of 3961.4 kg ha -1.

Treatment
sorghum @ 15 L ha -1 + Dual Gold @ 1.25 L ha -1e0
Outcome
seedcotton yielde0
Value
3961.4 kg ha -1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of sorghum @ 15 L ha -1 + Dual Gold @ 1.25 L ha -1 resulted in weeds mortality upto 66.6%, produced seedcotton yield of 3961.4 kg ha -1 and gave net benefit of Rs. 2,20,029”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum extract with Dual Gold gave a net benefit of Rs. 2,20,029.

Treatment
sorghum @ 15 L ha -1 + Dual Gold @ 1.25 L ha -1e0
Outcome
net benefite0
Value
Rs. 2,20,029e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of sorghum @ 15 L ha -1 + Dual Gold @ 1.25 L ha -1 resulted in weeds mortality upto 66.6%, produced seedcotton yield of 3961.4 kg ha -1 and gave net benefit of Rs. 2,20,029”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower extract with Dual Gold produced 65.5 % weed mortality.

Treatment
Sunflower applied @ 15 L ha -1 in integration with Dual Gold @ 1.25 L ha -1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weeds mortalitye0
Value
65.5 %e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sunflower applied @ 15 L ha -1 in integration with Dual Gold @ 1.25 L ha -1 showed weeds mortality of 65.5 %, resulted in seedcotton yield of 3949.7 kg ha -1 and net monetary benefit of Rs. 2,19,821”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1696 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower extract with Dual Gold produced seedcotton yield of 3949.7 kg ha -1.

Treatment
Sunflower applied @ 15 L ha -1 in integration with Dual Gold @ 1.25 L ha -1e0
Outcome
seedcotton yielde0
Value
3949.7 kg ha -1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sunflower applied @ 15 L ha -1 in integration with Dual Gold @ 1.25 L ha -1 showed weeds mortality of 65.5 %, resulted in seedcotton yield of 3949.7 kg ha -1 and net monetary benefit of Rs. 2,19,821”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1696 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower extract with Dual Gold gave Rs. 2,19,821 net monetary benefit.

Treatment
Sunflower applied @ 15 L ha -1 in integration with Dual Gold @ 1.25 L ha -1e0
Outcome
net monetary benefite0
Value
Rs. 2,19,821e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sunflower applied @ 15 L ha -1 in integration with Dual Gold @ 1.25 L ha -1 showed weeds mortality of 65.5 %, resulted in seedcotton yield of 3949.7 kg ha -1 and net monetary benefit of Rs. 2,19,821”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1696 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual Gold alone reduced weeds by 55.9%.

Treatment
Dual Gold @ 2.5 L ha -1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
55.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sole application of Dual Gold @ 2.5 L ha -1 reduced weeds by 55.9%, produced seedcotton yield of 3212.7 kg ha -1 and net resulted in net benefit of Rs. 1,77,414”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual Gold alone produced 3212.7 kg ha -1 seedcotton yield.

Treatment
Dual Gold @ 2.5 L ha -1e0
Outcome
seedcotton yielde0
Value
3212.7 kg ha -1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sole application of Dual Gold @ 2.5 L ha -1 reduced weeds by 55.9%, produced seedcotton yield of 3212.7 kg ha -1 and net resulted in net benefit of Rs. 1,77,414”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual Gold alone gave Rs. 1,77,414 net benefit.

Treatment
Dual Gold @ 2.5 L ha -1e0
Outcome
net benefite0
Value
Rs. 1,77,414e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sole application of Dual Gold @ 2.5 L ha -1 reduced weeds by 55.9%, produced seedcotton yield of 3212.7 kg ha -1 and net resulted in net benefit of Rs. 1,77,414”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interculturing twice gave maximum weed suppression of 67.7%.

Treatment
interculturing twice (30+60 DAS)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
suppression of weedse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
67.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interculturing twice (30+60 DAS) caused maximum (67.7%) suppression of weeds, produced maximum plant height (117.0 cm) and seedcotton yield (3977.8 kg ha -1 ) but conferred less (Rs. 2,14,151) net monetary benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1882–2096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interculturing twice gave maximum plant height of 117.0 cm and seedcotton yield of 3977.8 kg ha -1.

Treatment
interculturing twice (30+60 DAS)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
117.0 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interculturing twice (30+60 DAS) caused maximum (67.7%) suppression of weeds, produced maximum plant height (117.0 cm) and seedcotton yield (3977.8 kg ha -1 ) but conferred less (Rs. 2,14,151) net monetary benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1882–2096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interculturing twice produced maximum seedcotton yield of 3977.8 kg ha -1.

Treatment
interculturing twice (30+60 DAS)e0
Outcome
seedcotton yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3977.8 kg ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interculturing twice (30+60 DAS) caused maximum (67.7%) suppression of weeds, produced maximum plant height (117.0 cm) and seedcotton yield (3977.8 kg ha -1 ) but conferred less (Rs. 2,14,151) net monetary benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1882–2096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑

Sorghum · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Sorghum · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

botanical · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 35 positive, 1 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

botanical · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.