Paper · 2012 · Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology /Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology

PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN INSECTICIDES AND THEIR MIXTURES AGAINST, Tuta absoluta (MEYRICK) AND Helicoverpa armigera (HUBNER) INSECTS ON TOMATO CROP AT SOUTH VALLEY REGION

M. Soliman

19
claims
39
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Impact of certain insecticides and their mixtures (emamectin benzoate, imidaclopride, chlorfenapyr, indoxacarb, profenofos, pyridalyl, methomyl, teflubenzuron) were evaluated against tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) and Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) populations on tomato crop at south valley region. LC50 values indicated that emamectin benzoate was the most toxic compound (LC50 0.461 %) against T. absoluta, larvae. The carbamate insecticide, methomyl showed almost similar toxicity followed by in a descending order while teflubenzuron and chlorfenapyr were less effective (LC50 1.054 and 3.165 %), respectively. Pyridalyl was found to be the most effective insecticide against H. armigera. (LC50 0.513 %). The corresponding toxicities of the other tested insecticides, arranged according to their LC50’s in descending order were as follow: methomyl, emamectin benzoate, profenofos, imidaclopride, teflubenzuron, indoxacarb and chlorfenapyr. The LC50’s were ranged between (0.513 and 0.872 %), while, their toxicity indexes were ranged between (92.432 and 58.830 %). On the other hand, there were no differences occurred among the treatments. Mean of percent infestation were decreased 6 weeks after six sprayings, and the percent reduction in infestation were 79.73, 80.22, 78.41, 80.88, 80.50, 78.30, 79.64 and 78.25 % by using emamectin benzoate, methomyl, imidaclopride, pyridalyl, profenofos, indoxacarb, teflubenzuron and chlorfenapyr, respectively. The efficiency of the tested insecticides was increased with increasing the number of sprays from 2 to 6 causing reduction in insect leaf miner infestation ranged between 68.02 to 80.88 %, respectively. Generally, the tested insecticides and their mixtures achieved a considerable reduction in T. absoluta and H. armigera population.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate was the most toxic insecticide to T. absoluta larvae on tomato (LC50 0.461 %).

Treatment
emamectin benzoatee1
Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae1pest
Outcome
LC50e1
Direction
most toxice1
Value
0.461 %e1
Qualifier
larvaee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“emamectin benzoate was the most toxic compound (LC50 0.461 %) against T. absoluta, larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methomyl showed almost similar toxicity to T. absoluta on tomato.

Treatment
methomyle1
Outcome
toxicitye1
Direction
almost similare1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“The carbamate insecticide, methomyl showed almost similar toxicity followed by in a descending order”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Teflubenzuron was less effective against T. absoluta on tomato, with LC50 1.054.

Treatment
teflubenzurone1
Outcome
LC50e1
Direction
less effectivee1
Value
1.054e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“teflubenzuron and chlorfenapyr were less effective (LC50 1.054 and 3.165 %), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorfenapyr was less effective against T. absoluta on tomato, with LC50 3.165.

Treatment
chlorfenapyre1
Outcome
LC50e1
Direction
less effectivee1
Value
3.165e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“teflubenzuron and chlorfenapyr were less effective (LC50 1.054 and 3.165 %), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyridalyl was the most effective insecticide against H. armigera on tomato (LC50 0.513 %).

Treatment
Pyridalyle1
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
LC50e1
Direction
most effectivee1
Value
0.513 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pyridalyl was found to be the most effective insecticide against H. armigera. (LC50 0.513 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The other tested insecticides ranked in descending toxicity with LC50 values between 0.513 and 0.872 %.

Treatment
other tested insecticidese1
Outcome
LC50e2
Direction
descending ordere1
Value
0.513 and 0.872 %e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“The corresponding toxicities of the other tested insecticides, arranged according to their LC50’s in descending order”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–838 · show in text ↑
e2

“The LC50’s were ranged between (0.513 and 0.872 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1006 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toxicity indexes of the tested insecticides ranged between 58.830 and 92.432 %.

Outcome
toxicity indexese1
Value
92.432 and 58.830 %e1
Qualifier
ranged betweene1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“their toxicity indexes were ranged between (92.432 and 58.830 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1079 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No differences occurred among the insecticide treatments in infestation control.

Outcome
no differences occurred among the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“there were no differences occurred among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate reduced infestation by 79.73 % after six sprayings.

Treatment
emamectin benzoatee1
Outcome
percent reduction in infestatione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
79.73e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“the percent reduction in infestation were 79.73, 80.22, 78.41, 80.88, 80.50, 78.30, 79.64 and 78.25 % by using emamectin benzoate, methomyl, imidaclopride, pyridalyl, profenofos, indoxacarb, teflubenzuron and chlorfenapyr, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methomyl reduced infestation by 80.22 % after six sprayings.

Treatment
methomyle1
Outcome
percent reduction in infestatione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
80.22e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“the percent reduction in infestation were 79.73, 80.22, 78.41, 80.88, 80.50, 78.30, 79.64 and 78.25 % by using emamectin benzoate, methomyl, imidaclopride, pyridalyl, profenofos, indoxacarb, teflubenzuron and chlorfenapyr, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid reduced infestation by 78.41 % after six sprayings.

Treatment
imidaclopridee1
Outcome
percent reduction in infestatione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
78.41e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“the percent reduction in infestation were 79.73, 80.22, 78.41, 80.88, 80.50, 78.30, 79.64 and 78.25 % by using emamectin benzoate, methomyl, imidaclopride, pyridalyl, profenofos, indoxacarb, teflubenzuron and chlorfenapyr, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyridalyl reduced infestation by 80.88 % after six sprayings.

Treatment
pyridalyle1
Outcome
percent reduction in infestatione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
80.88e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“the percent reduction in infestation were 79.73, 80.22, 78.41, 80.88, 80.50, 78.30, 79.64 and 78.25 % by using emamectin benzoate, methomyl, imidaclopride, pyridalyl, profenofos, indoxacarb, teflubenzuron and chlorfenapyr, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profenofos reduced infestation by 80.50 % after six sprayings.

Treatment
profenofose1
Outcome
percent reduction in infestatione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
80.50e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“the percent reduction in infestation were 79.73, 80.22, 78.41, 80.88, 80.50, 78.30, 79.64 and 78.25 % by using emamectin benzoate, methomyl, imidaclopride, pyridalyl, profenofos, indoxacarb, teflubenzuron and chlorfenapyr, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb reduced infestation by 78.30 % after six sprayings.

Treatment
indoxacarbe1
Outcome
percent reduction in infestatione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
78.30e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“the percent reduction in infestation were 79.73, 80.22, 78.41, 80.88, 80.50, 78.30, 79.64 and 78.25 % by using emamectin benzoate, methomyl, imidaclopride, pyridalyl, profenofos, indoxacarb, teflubenzuron and chlorfenapyr, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Teflubenzuron reduced infestation by 79.64 % after six sprayings.

Treatment
teflubenzurone1
Outcome
percent reduction in infestatione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
79.64e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“the percent reduction in infestation were 79.73, 80.22, 78.41, 80.88, 80.50, 78.30, 79.64 and 78.25 % by using emamectin benzoate, methomyl, imidaclopride, pyridalyl, profenofos, indoxacarb, teflubenzuron and chlorfenapyr, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorfenapyr reduced infestation by 78.25 % after six sprayings.

Treatment
chlorfenapyre1
Outcome
percent reduction in infestatione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
78.25e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“the percent reduction in infestation were 79.73, 80.22, 78.41, 80.88, 80.50, 78.30, 79.64 and 78.25 % by using emamectin benzoate, methomyl, imidaclopride, pyridalyl, profenofos, indoxacarb, teflubenzuron and chlorfenapyr, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Efficiency of the insecticides against leaf miner infestation increased with the number of sprays from 2 to 6, with reduction of 68.02 to 80.88 %.

Treatment
number of sprayse1
Interactor
insect leaf minere1pest
Outcome
reduction in insect leaf miner infestatione1
Direction
increasede1
Value
68.02 to 80.88 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“The efficiency of the tested insecticides was increased with increasing the number of sprays from 2 to 6 causing reduction in insect leaf miner infestation ranged between 68.02 to 80.88 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticides and their mixtures achieved a considerable reduction in T. absoluta and H. armigera populations on tomato.

Treatment
tested insecticides and their mixturese1
Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae1pest
Second interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
reduction in T. absoluta and H. armigera populatione1
Direction
reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · Second interactorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“the tested insecticides and their mixtures achieved a considerable reduction in T. absoluta and H. armigera population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean percent infestation decreased 6 weeks after six sprayings.

Treatment
six sprayingse1
Outcome
percent infestatione1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
6 weeks after six sprayingse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations on tomato crop at south valley region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean of percent infestation were decreased 6 weeks after six sprayings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1227 · show in text ↑

profenofos · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

methomyl · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

indoxacarb · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

emamectin benzoate · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

pyridalyl · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

teflubenzuron · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

pyridalyl · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chlorfenapyr · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.