Paper · 2015 · Research on Crops

Efficacies and economics of some novel insecticides for management of major lepidopteran pests of tomato

Sandip Patra; B. C. Das; V. W. Dhote; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Efficacies and economics of some new insecticides were evaluated for the management of major lepidopteran pests of tomato at Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Kalyani, West Bengal during 2012–14. Three novel insecticides viz., pyridalyl 10 EC (56.25, 75, 112.5 and 150 g a. i./ha), indoxacarb 14.5 SC (56.25, 75, 112.5 and 150 g a. i./ha) and chlorfenapyr 10 SC (75, 100, 150 and 200 g a.i./ha) were applied twice with four doses along with two standard checks (chlorpyriphos 20 EC @ 350 g a. i./ha and triazophos 40 EC @ 350 g a. i./ha) and untreated control. Pooled results revealed that pyridalyl and indoxacarb @ 150 g a. i./ha were found to be very effective insecticides against Helicoverpa armigera (3.10 and 2.60% fruit damage) and Spodoptera litura (3.34 and 3.59% fruit damage) with 211.21 and 209.59 q/ha marketable yield, respectively. Results indicated that traditional insecticides such as triazophos and chlorpyriphos were most cost effective insecticides with 10.24 and 9.56 benefit: cost ratio, respectively, whereas pyridalyl and indoxacarb at lower doses showed cost efficiency for management of lepidopteran pests of tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyridalyl at 150 g a.i./ha was very effective against Helicoverpa armigera in tomato, with 3.10% fruit damage.

Treatment
pyridalyle0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
3.10e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“pyridalyl and indoxacarb @ 150 g a. i./ha were found to be very effective insecticides against Helicoverpa armigera (3.10 and 2.60% fruit damage) and Spodoptera litura (3.34 and 3.59% fruit damage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb at 150 g a.i./ha was very effective against Helicoverpa armigera in tomato, with 2.60% fruit damage.

Treatment
indoxacarb @ 150 g a. i./hae0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
2.60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“pyridalyl and indoxacarb @ 150 g a. i./ha were found to be very effective insecticides against Helicoverpa armigera (3.10 and 2.60% fruit damage) and Spodoptera litura (3.34 and 3.59% fruit damage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyridalyl at 150 g a.i./ha was very effective against Spodoptera litura in tomato, with 3.34% fruit damage.

Treatment
pyridalyle0
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturae0pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
3.34e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“pyridalyl and indoxacarb @ 150 g a. i./ha were found to be very effective insecticides against Helicoverpa armigera (3.10 and 2.60% fruit damage) and Spodoptera litura (3.34 and 3.59% fruit damage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb at 150 g a.i./ha was very effective against Spodoptera litura in tomato, with 3.59% fruit damage.

Treatment
indoxacarb @ 150 g a. i./hae0
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturae0pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
3.59%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“pyridalyl and indoxacarb @ 150 g a. i./ha were found to be very effective insecticides against Helicoverpa armigera (3.10 and 2.60% fruit damage) and Spodoptera litura (3.34 and 3.59% fruit damage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyridalyl at 150 g a.i./ha gave a marketable tomato yield of 211.21 q/ha.

Treatment
pyridalyle0
Outcome
marketable yielde1
Value
211.21e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“pyridalyl and indoxacarb @ 150 g a. i./ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–635 · show in text ↑
e1

“with 211.21 and 209.59 q/ha marketable yield, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb at 150 g a.i./ha gave a marketable tomato yield of 209.59 q/ha.

Treatment
indoxacarbe0
Outcome
marketable yielde1
Value
209.59 q/hae1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“pyridalyl and indoxacarb @ 150 g a. i./ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–635 · show in text ↑
e1

“with 211.21 and 209.59 q/ha marketable yield, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triazophos was among the most cost effective insecticides for tomato lepidopteran pests, with a benefit:cost ratio of 10.24.

Treatment
triazophose0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
10.24e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“triazophos and chlorpyriphos were most cost effective insecticides with 10.24 and 9.56 benefit: cost ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyriphos was among the most cost effective insecticides for tomato lepidopteran pests, with a benefit:cost ratio of 9.56.

Treatment
chlorpyriphose0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
9.56e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“triazophos and chlorpyriphos were most cost effective insecticides with 10.24 and 9.56 benefit: cost ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyridalyl and indoxacarb at lower doses showed cost efficiency for managing lepidopteran pests of tomato.

Treatment
pyridalyl and indoxacarb at lower dosese0
Interactor
lepidopteran pestse0pest
Outcome
cost efficiencye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pyridalyl and indoxacarb at lower doses showed cost efficiency for management of lepidopteran pests of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1147 · show in text ↑

indoxacarb · Spodoptera litura · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

triazophos · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

pyridalyl · Spodoptera litura · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chlorpyrifos · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pyridalyl · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

indoxacarb · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

indoxacarb · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.