Paper · 2020 · Agronomy Journal

Nitrogen management enhanced plant growth, antioxidant ability, and grain yield of rice under salinity stress

Guanglong Zhu; Haitong Lu; Xiaoxu Shi; et al.

18
claims
21
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Salinity is a major abiotic stress limiting crop growth and reducing grain yield. In recent years, little progress was made in salt‐tolerant cultivation techniques. Therefore, a controlled experiment was conducted to study the effects of nitrogen management (NM) on growth, antioxidant ability, and yield performance of salt‐tolerant rice ( Oryza sativa L.) under salinity stress. Three salinity levels (0‰ as control; 0.75‰, 4.3 dS m −1 ; and 1.5‰, 7.7 dS m −1 ) and four levels of NM (tillering fertilizer/panicle initiation fertilizer = 7:3, 6:4, 5:5, and 4:6) were arranged in this study. Under salinity stress, plant height, tiller number, fresh weight, grain yield, panicle, spikelets per panicle, grain weight, and soluble sugar content in stem were significantly decreased. In contrast, antioxidant parameters of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalase were significantly increased. Grain filling percentage and sucrose content were slightly changed. Compared to the control, grain yield was reduced by 45.6%, 34.8%, 60.4%, and 46.7% at the ratio of 7:3, 6:4, 5:5, and 4:6 NM at 0.75‰ salinity level, and 73.5%, 59.7%, 74.8%, and 61.7% at 1.5‰ salinity level, respectively. The highest yield was generated by 6:4 NM at both the 0.75‰ and 1.5‰ salinity level, and the lowest by 4:6 and 5:5. However, NM could obviously alleviate the inhibition effects of salinity stress and improve antioxidant ability of rice. Among them, 6:4 NM performed the best alleviation effects, followed by 7:3 and 5:5 NM. This study suggests that the appropriate NM can effectively alleviate salinity stress and increase grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased rice growth and yield traits.

Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
plant height, tiller number, fresh weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under salinity stress, plant height, tiller number, fresh weight, grain yield, panicle, spikelets per panicle, grain weight, and soluble sugar content in stem were significantly decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased grain yield and related traits.

Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
grain yield, panicle, spikelets per paniclee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under salinity stress, plant height, tiller number, fresh weight, grain yield, panicle, spikelets per panicle, grain weight, and soluble sugar content in stem were significantly decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased grain weight and stem soluble sugar.

Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
grain weight, and soluble sugar content in steme0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under salinity stress, plant height, tiller number, fresh weight, grain yield, panicle, spikelets per panicle, grain weight, and soluble sugar content in stem were significantly decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant enzyme parameters increased significantly under salinity.

Outcome
antioxidant parameters of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalasee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“antioxidant parameters of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalase were significantly increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–906 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain filling percentage and sucrose content changed slightly.

Outcome
Grain filling percentage and sucrose contente0
Direction
slightly changede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Grain filling percentage and sucrose content were slightly changed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.75‰ salinity, yield declined 45.6% with 7:3 nitrogen management.

Treatment
0.75‰ salinity levele0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
45.6%e0
Qualifier
7:3e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield was reduced by 45.6%, 34.8%, 60.4%, and 46.7% at the ratio of 7:3, 6:4, 5:5, and 4:6 NM at 0.75‰ salinity level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.75‰ salinity, yield declined 34.8% with 6:4 nitrogen management.

Treatment
0.75‰ salinity levele0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
34.8%e0
Qualifier
6:4e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield was reduced by 45.6%, 34.8%, 60.4%, and 46.7% at the ratio of 7:3, 6:4, 5:5, and 4:6 NM at 0.75‰ salinity level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.75‰ salinity, yield declined 60.4% with 5:5 nitrogen management.

Treatment
0.75‰ salinity levele0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
60.4%e0
Qualifier
5:5e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield was reduced by 45.6%, 34.8%, 60.4%, and 46.7% at the ratio of 7:3, 6:4, 5:5, and 4:6 NM at 0.75‰ salinity level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.75‰ salinity, yield declined 46.7% with 4:6 nitrogen management.

Treatment
0.75‰ salinity levele0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
46.7%e0
Qualifier
4:6e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield was reduced by 45.6%, 34.8%, 60.4%, and 46.7% at the ratio of 7:3, 6:4, 5:5, and 4:6 NM at 0.75‰ salinity level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1.5‰ salinity, yield declined 73.5% with 7:3 nitrogen management.

Treatment
1.5‰ salinity levele0
Value
73.5%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorOutcomeDirection

Verbatim

e0

“73.5%, 59.7%, 74.8%, and 61.7% at 1.5‰ salinity level, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1.5‰ salinity, yield declined 59.7% with 6:4 nitrogen management.

Treatment
1.5‰ salinity levele0
Value
59.7%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorOutcomeDirection

Verbatim

e0

“73.5%, 59.7%, 74.8%, and 61.7% at 1.5‰ salinity level, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1.5‰ salinity, yield declined 74.8% with 5:5 nitrogen management.

Treatment
1.5‰ salinity levele0
Value
74.8%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorOutcomeDirection

Verbatim

e0

“73.5%, 59.7%, 74.8%, and 61.7% at 1.5‰ salinity level, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1.5‰ salinity, yield declined 61.7% with 4:6 nitrogen management.

Treatment
1.5‰ salinity levele0
Value
61.7%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorOutcomeDirection

Verbatim

e0

“73.5%, 59.7%, 74.8%, and 61.7% at 1.5‰ salinity level, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1197 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 6:4 nitrogen regime produced the highest yield at both salinity levels.

Treatment
6:4 NMe0
Outcome
highest yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield was generated by 6:4 NM at both the 0.75‰ and 1.5‰ salinity level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1281 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 4:6 and 5:5 regimes produced the lowest yields.

Treatment
4:6 and 5:5e0
Outcome
loweste0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“and the lowest by 4:6 and 5:5.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen management alleviated salinity inhibition and improved antioxidant ability.

Treatment
NMe0
Outcome
antioxidant abilitye0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NM could obviously alleviate the inhibition effects of salinity stress and improve antioxidant ability of rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1434 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 6:4 regime had the best alleviation, followed by 7:3 and 5:5.

Treatment
6:4 NMe0
Outcome
best alleviation effectse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“6:4 NM performed the best alleviation effects, followed by 7:3 and 5:5 NM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1521 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend suitable nitrogen management to alleviate salinity and increase yield.

Treatment
appropriate NMe0
Outcome
alleviate salinity stress and increase grain yielde0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“appropriate NM can effectively alleviate salinity stress and increase grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1633 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: osmolytes · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

29 papers: 19 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 86 positive, 35 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

salinity · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

167 papers: 29 positive, 138 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

163 papers more in this group

See all 167 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.