Paper · 2019 · Scientific Reports

Combined use of a microbial restoration substrate and avirulent Ralstonia solanacearum for the control of tomato bacterial wilt

Xuefang Zheng; Yujing Zhu; Jieping Wang; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
39
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Tomato bacterial wilt (BW) caused by Ralstonia solanacearum seriously restricts tomato production and no effective control measures are available. A microbial restoration substrate (MRS) had been proved to be effective control of tomato BW in a greenhouse cultivation. In this study, MRS was combined with an avirulent Ralstonia solanacearum (aRS) strain to control the disease under an open field condition. In the two consecutive year (2017 and 2018) trials, the combined use of aRS and MRS resulted in better disease control compared with either aRS or MRS alone. Moreover, the combined treatment was more effective than expected and suggesting a synergistic control effect. Compared with control (CK, non-aRS or MRS), the application of aRS and MRS treatments alone or in combination could all promote plant growth, increase root activity and yield (e.g. the yield for the treatment of aRS + MRS increased by 463.64% in 2017). Soil nutrients, including soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, total phosphorus and total potassium contents were also significantly increased by the application of aRS and MRS treatments alone or in combination (P < 0.05). The application of MRS or in combination with aRS changed the soil from acidic to neutral, which is one of the key factors for controlling BW. The soil enzymatic activities were notably influenced by the combined use of aRS and MRS, which increased urease (87.37% in 2017 and 60.89% in 2018), catalase (93.67% in 2017 and 279.37% in 2018) and alkaline phosphatase activities (193.77% in 2017 and 455.73% in 2018). These results suggest that the combination of MRS and aRS could effectively control tomato BW and thus represents a promising new tool to control this disease.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined aRS and MRS gave better disease control of tomato bacterial wilt than either alone

Treatment
the combined use of aRS and MRSe1
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Second interactor
avirulent Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease controle1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
either aRS or MRS alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato bacterial wilt (BW) caused by Ralstonia solanacearum seriously restricts tomato production and no effective control measures are available”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the two consecutive year (2017 and 2018) trials, the combined use of aRS and MRS resulted in better disease control compared with either aRS or MRS alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–565 · show in text ↑
e2

“In this study, MRS was combined with an avirulent Ralstonia solanacearum (aRS) strain to control the disease under an open field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment was more effective against wilt than expected, suggesting a synergistic control effect

Treatment
combined treatmente3
Outcome
control effecte3
Direction
more effectivee3
Comparator
expectede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato bacterial wilt (BW) caused by Ralstonia solanacearum seriously restricts tomato production and no effective control measures are available”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e3

“Moreover, the combined treatment was more effective than expected and suggesting a synergistic control effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

aRS and MRS alone or in combination promoted plant growth compared with control

Treatment
aRS and MRS treatments alone or in combinatione4
Outcome
plant growthe4
Direction
promotee4
Comparator
control (CK, non-aRS or MRS)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato bacterial wilt (BW) caused by Ralstonia solanacearum seriously restricts tomato production and no effective control measures are available”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compared with control (CK, non-aRS or MRS), the application of aRS and MRS treatments alone or in combination could all promote plant growth, increase root activity and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

aRS and MRS alone or in combination increased root activity compared with control

Treatment
aRS and MRS treatments alone or in combinatione4
Outcome
root activitye4
Direction
increasee4
Comparator
control (CK, non-aRS or MRS)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato bacterial wilt (BW) caused by Ralstonia solanacearum seriously restricts tomato production and no effective control measures are available”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compared with control (CK, non-aRS or MRS), the application of aRS and MRS treatments alone or in combination could all promote plant growth, increase root activity and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield for the aRS + MRS treatment increased by 463.64% in 2017 compared with control

Treatment
aRS + MRSe5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
increasede5
Value
463.64%e5
Comparator
control (CK, non-aRS or MRS)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato bacterial wilt (BW) caused by Ralstonia solanacearum seriously restricts tomato production and no effective control measures are available”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compared with control (CK, non-aRS or MRS), the application of aRS and MRS treatments alone or in combination could all promote plant growth, increase root activity and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–852 · show in text ↑
e5

“the yield for the treatment of aRS + MRS increased by 463.64% in 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

aRS and MRS alone or in combination significantly increased soil organic carbon, total nitrogen and total phosphorus

Treatment
aRS and MRS treatments alone or in combinatione6
Outcome
soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, total phosphoruse6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato bacterial wilt (BW) caused by Ralstonia solanacearum seriously restricts tomato production and no effective control measures are available”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e6

“Soil nutrients, including soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, total phosphorus and total potassium contents were also significantly increased by the application of aRS and MRS treatments alone or in combination (P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

aRS and MRS alone or in combination significantly increased soil total potassium contents

Treatment
aRS and MRS treatments alone or in combinatione6
Outcome
total potassium contentse6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato bacterial wilt (BW) caused by Ralstonia solanacearum seriously restricts tomato production and no effective control measures are available”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e6

“Soil nutrients, including soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, total phosphorus and total potassium contents were also significantly increased by the application of aRS and MRS treatments alone or in combination (P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MRS alone or with aRS changed soil from acidic to neutral, which is one of the key factors for controlling BW

Treatment
MRS or in combination with aRSe7
Outcome
from acidic to neutrale7
Direction
changede7
Qualifier
one of the key factors for controlling BWe7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato bacterial wilt (BW) caused by Ralstonia solanacearum seriously restricts tomato production and no effective control measures are available”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e7

“The application of MRS or in combination with aRS changed the soil from acidic to neutral, which is one of the key factors for controlling BW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined aRS and MRS treatment increased soil urease activity

Treatment
combined use of aRS and MRSe7
Outcome
ureasee7
Direction
increasede7
Value
87.37% in 2017 and 60.89% in 2018e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato bacterial wilt (BW) caused by Ralstonia solanacearum seriously restricts tomato production and no effective control measures are available”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e7

“The soil enzymatic activities were notably influenced by the combined use of aRS and MRS, which increased urease (87.37% in 2017 and 60.89% in 2018), catalase (93.67% in 2017 and 279.37% in 2018) and alkaline phosphatase activities (193.77% in 2017 and 455.73% in 2018)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined aRS and MRS treatment increased soil catalase activity

Treatment
combined use of aRS and MRSe7
Outcome
catalasee7
Direction
increasede7
Value
93.67% in 2017 and 279.37% in 2018e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato bacterial wilt (BW) caused by Ralstonia solanacearum seriously restricts tomato production and no effective control measures are available”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e7

“The soil enzymatic activities were notably influenced by the combined use of aRS and MRS, which increased urease (87.37% in 2017 and 60.89% in 2018), catalase (93.67% in 2017 and 279.37% in 2018) and alkaline phosphatase activities (193.77% in 2017 and 455.73% in 2018)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined aRS and MRS treatment increased soil alkaline phosphatase activity

Treatment
combined use of aRS and MRSe7
Outcome
alkaline phosphatase activitiese7
Direction
increasede7
Value
193.77% in 2017 and 455.73% in 2018e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato bacterial wilt (BW) caused by Ralstonia solanacearum seriously restricts tomato production and no effective control measures are available”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e7

“The soil enzymatic activities were notably influenced by the combined use of aRS and MRS, which increased urease (87.37% in 2017 and 60.89% in 2018), catalase (93.67% in 2017 and 279.37% in 2018) and alkaline phosphatase activities (193.77% in 2017 and 455.73% in 2018)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1567 · show in text ↑

Ralstonia solanacearum · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Ralstonia solanacearum · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Ralstonia solanacearum · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

growing medium · physiology: enzyme activity · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

growing medium · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

growing medium · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 34 positive, 7 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

growing medium · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 112 positive, 29 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

growing medium · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

169 papers: 126 positive, 43 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

165 papers more in this group

See all 169 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.