Paper · 1978 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Effects of Nitrogen Form and Level on Ion Concentrations, Water Stress, and Blossom-end Rot Incidence in Tomato1

W. G. Pill; V. N. Lambeth; T. M. Hinckley

14
claims
25
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Ammonium nutrition, in comparison to NO 3 –N nutrition, of tomato in sand culture reduced shoot growth, total and mean fruit weight, fruit number, leaf xylem pressure potential, leaf CA, Mg, and NO 3 concentration, and normal fruit Ca, Mg, K, and NO 3 concentration. Leaf diffusive resistance, leaf NH 4 concentration, and blossom-end rot incidence were increased by NH 4 –N nutrition. Increasing substrate NO 3 level increased shoot growth, fruit number per plant, and fruit NO 3 concentration. Increasing substrate NH 4 level increased leaf diffusive resistance, and leaf xylem pressure potential, but had no effect on shoot growth. Under both N forms, increasing N level did not affect fruit yield or normal fruit Ca, K, or P concentration, but decreased leaf Ca, Mg, and P concentration, and increased normal fruit Mg. Blossom-end rot occurred only under NH 4 –N nutrition. Affected fruit had lower Ca, Mg, NO 3 , and NH 4 concentration and higher fruit K/Ca ratio. Fruit condition exerted no effect on fruit P or K concentration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nutrition reduced shoot growth, total and mean fruit weight, and fruit number relative to nitrate nutrition.

Treatment
Ammonium nutritione0
Outcome
shoot growth, total and mean fruit weight, fruit numbere0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
NO 3 –N nutritione0
Setting
sand culturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium nutrition, in comparison to NO 3 –N nutrition, of tomato in sand culture reduced shoot growth, total and mean fruit weight, fruit number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nutrition reduced leaf xylem pressure potential and leaf Ca, Mg and nitrate concentration.

Treatment
Ammonium nutritione0
Outcome
leaf xylem pressure potential, leaf CA, Mg, and NO 3 concentratione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
NO 3 –N nutritione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium nutrition, in comparison to NO 3 –N nutrition, of tomato in sand culture reduced shoot growth, total and mean fruit weight, fruit number, leaf xylem pressure potential, leaf CA, Mg, and NO 3 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nutrition reduced normal fruit Ca, Mg, K and nitrate concentrations.

Treatment
Ammonium nutritione0
Outcome
normal fruit Ca, Mg, K, and NO 3 concentratione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
NO 3 –N nutritione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium nutrition, in comparison to NO 3 –N nutrition, of tomato in sand culture reduced shoot growth, total and mean fruit weight, fruit number, leaf xylem pressure potential, leaf CA, Mg, and NO 3 concentration, and normal fruit Ca, Mg, K, and NO 3 concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nutrition increased leaf diffusive resistance, leaf ammonium concentration and blossom-end rot incidence.

Treatment
NH 4 –N nutritione0
Outcome
Leaf diffusive resistance, leaf NH 4 concentration, and blossom-end rot incidencee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf diffusive resistance, leaf NH 4 concentration, and blossom-end rot incidence were increased by NH 4 –N nutrition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“of tomato in sand culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrate level increased shoot growth, fruit number per plant and fruit nitrate concentration.

Treatment
Increasing substrate NO 3 levele0
Outcome
shoot growth, fruit number per plant, and fruit NO 3 concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing substrate NO 3 level increased shoot growth, fruit number per plant, and fruit NO 3 concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“of tomato in sand culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing ammonium level increased leaf diffusive resistance and xylem pressure potential.

Treatment
Increasing substrate NH 4 levele0
Outcome
leaf diffusive resistance, and leaf xylem pressure potentiale0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing substrate NH 4 level increased leaf diffusive resistance, and leaf xylem pressure potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“of tomato in sand culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing ammonium level had no effect on shoot growth.

Treatment
Increasing substrate NH 4 levele0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing substrate NH 4 level increased leaf diffusive resistance, and leaf xylem pressure potential, but had no effect on shoot growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–643 · show in text ↑
e1

“of tomato in sand culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under both nitrogen forms, increasing nitrogen level did not affect fruit yield or normal fruit Ca, K or P concentration.

Treatment
increasing N levele0
Outcome
fruit yield or normal fruit Ca, K, or P concentratione0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under both N forms, increasing N level did not affect fruit yield or normal fruit Ca, K, or P concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–751 · show in text ↑
e1

“of tomato in sand culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under both nitrogen forms, increasing nitrogen level decreased leaf Ca, Mg and P concentration.

Treatment
increasing N levele0
Outcome
leaf Ca, Mg, and P concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under both N forms, increasing N level did not affect fruit yield or normal fruit Ca, K, or P concentration, but decreased leaf Ca, Mg, and P concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–799 · show in text ↑
e1

“of tomato in sand culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under both nitrogen forms, increasing nitrogen level increased normal fruit Mg.

Treatment
increasing N levele0
Outcome
normal fruit Mge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under both N forms, increasing N level did not affect fruit yield or normal fruit Ca, K, or P concentration, but decreased leaf Ca, Mg, and P concentration, and increased normal fruit Mg.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–831 · show in text ↑
e1

“of tomato in sand culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blossom-end rot occurred only under ammonium nutrition.

Treatment
NH 4 –N nutritione0
Outcome
Blossom-end rote0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Blossom-end rot occurred only under NH 4 –N nutrition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“of tomato in sand culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Affected fruit had lower Ca, Mg, nitrate and ammonium concentrations.

Organ / stage
Affected fruite0
Outcome
Ca, Mg, NO 3 , and NH 4 concentratione0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Affected fruit had lower Ca, Mg, NO 3 , and NH 4 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–949 · show in text ↑
e1

“of tomato in sand culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Affected fruit had a higher K/Ca ratio.

Organ / stage
Affected fruite0
Outcome
fruit K/Ca ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Affected fruit had lower Ca, Mg, NO 3 , and NH 4 concentration and higher fruit K/Ca ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“of tomato in sand culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit condition did not affect fruit P or K concentration.

Organ / stage
Fruite0
Outcome
fruit P or K concentratione0
Direction
no effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit condition exerted no effect on fruit P or K concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1043 · show in text ↑
e1

“of tomato in sand culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

77 papers: 59 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 26 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

growing medium · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 112 positive, 29 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

growing medium · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

169 papers: 126 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 126 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

165 papers more in this group

See all 169 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

210 papers: 172 positive, 38 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 172 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

206 papers more in this group

See all 210 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.