Paper · 2019 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Pre-and post-emergence herbicides effect on growth, nodulation and productivity of greengram

Guriqbal Singh; Harpreet Kaur Virk; Veena Khanna

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during Kharif season to study the efficacy of different pre- and post-emergence herbicides for weed management in greengram. Pre-emergence (PE) application of pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.75 kg/ha (pre-mix) effectively reduced both the density and dry matter of weeds whereas post-emergence (PoE) application of imazethapyr 10 SL at 55 g/ha significantly reduced Cyperus rotundus. All the PE and PoE herbicides significantly reduced the dry weight of weeds at 30 and 60 days after sowing (DAS) as compared to weedy check. The highest weed control efficiency was recorded in two hand weeding (90.2%), and was followed by pendimethalin + imazethapyr (pre-mix) 0.75 kg/ha applied as PE (86.8%). PoE herbicides (imazethapyr, imazamox+ imazethapyr and clodinafop-propargyl + aciflourfen- sodium) not only suppressed the crop growth, but also exhibited antagonistic effect on root nodulation. Significantly higher seed yields were recorded under two hand weeding and pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.75 kg/ha (PE). Two hand weeding also recorded the highest gross and net returns, and was followed by pendimethalin + imazethapyr (pre-mix) at 0.75 kg/ha (PE). Application of pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.75 kg/ha (PE) also gave the highest B:C ratio, and it was followed by two hand weeding. All the PoE herbicides fetched comparatively lower returns and B:C ratio.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence pendimethalin plus imazethapyr reduced weed density and dry matter in greengram.

Treatment
pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.75 kg/hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
density and dry matter of weedse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-emergence (PE) application of pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.75 kg/ha (pre-mix) effectively reduced both the density and dry matter of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–304 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence imazethapyr significantly reduced Cyperus rotundus.

Treatment
imazethapyr 10 SL at 55 g/hae0
Interactor
Cyperus rotundusCyperus rotunduse0weed
Outcome
Cyperus rotunduse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cyperus rotundus
Cyperus rotundus · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Rickjpelleg assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post-emergence (PoE) application of imazethapyr 10 SL at 55 g/ha significantly reduced Cyperus rotundus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–416 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All pre- and post-emergence herbicides reduced weed dry weight at 30 and 60 days after sowing versus the weedy check.

Treatment
All the PE and PoE herbicidese0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
dry weight of weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
at 30 and 60 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the PE and PoE herbicides significantly reduced the dry weight of weeds at 30 and 60 days after sowing (DAS) as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–557 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

two hand weeding achieved 90.2% weed control efficiency.

Treatment
two hand weedinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
90.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest weed control efficiency was recorded in two hand weeding (90.2%), and was followed by pendimethalin + imazethapyr (pre-mix) 0.75 kg/ha applied as PE (86.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pendimethalin + imazethapyr (pre-mix) 0.75 kg/ha achieved 86.8% weed control efficiency.

Treatment
pendimethalin + imazethapyr (pre-mix) 0.75 kg/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
followede0
Value
86.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest weed control efficiency was recorded in two hand weeding (90.2%), and was followed by pendimethalin + imazethapyr (pre-mix) 0.75 kg/ha applied as PE (86.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence herbicides suppressed crop growth in greengram.

Treatment
PoE herbicidese0
Outcome
crop growthe0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PoE herbicides (imazethapyr, imazamox+ imazethapyr and clodinafop-propargyl + aciflourfen- sodium) not only suppressed the crop growth, but also exhibited antagonistic effect on root nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence herbicides suppressed root nodulation in greengram.

Treatment
PoE herbicidese0
Outcome
root nodulatione0
Direction
antagonistice0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PoE herbicides (imazethapyr, imazamox+ imazethapyr and clodinafop-propargyl + aciflourfen- sodium) not only suppressed the crop growth, but also exhibited antagonistic effect on root nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

two hand weeding produced significantly higher greengram seed yield.

Treatment
two hand weedinge0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher seed yields were recorded under two hand weeding and pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.75 kg/ha (PE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.75 kg/ha (PE) produced significantly higher greengram seed yield.

Treatment
pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.75 kg/ha (PE)e0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher seed yields were recorded under two hand weeding and pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.75 kg/ha (PE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weeding ranked highest for gross and net returns.

Treatment
Two hand weedinge0
Outcome
gross and net returnse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two hand weeding also recorded the highest gross and net returns, and was followed by pendimethalin + imazethapyr (pre-mix) at 0.75 kg/ha (PE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pendimethalin + imazethapyr (pre-mix) at 0.75 kg/ha (PE) ranked followed for gross and net returns.

Treatment
pendimethalin + imazethapyr (pre-mix) at 0.75 kg/ha (PE)e0
Outcome
gross and net returnse0
Direction
followede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two hand weeding also recorded the highest gross and net returns, and was followed by pendimethalin + imazethapyr (pre-mix) at 0.75 kg/ha (PE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.75 kg/ha (PE) ranked highest for benefit-cost ratio.

Treatment
pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.75 kg/ha (PE)e0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.75 kg/ha (PE) also gave the highest B:C ratio, and it was followed by two hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

two hand weeding ranked followed for benefit-cost ratio.

Treatment
two hand weedinge0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
followede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.75 kg/ha (PE) also gave the highest B:C ratio, and it was followed by two hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence herbicides yielded comparatively lower returns and benefit-cost ratio.

Treatment
All the PoE herbicidese0
Outcome
returns and B:C ratioe0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the PoE herbicides fetched comparatively lower returns and B:C ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

50 papers: 49 positive, 1 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 45 positive, 1 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 46 positive, 6 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

herbicide · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 19 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 103 positive, 6 negative or no effect

102 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

herbicide · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

73 papers: 73 positive, 0 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.