Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of weed control measures on weeds, nodulation, growth and yield of mungbean (Vigna radiata)

PANCH RAM MIRJHA; S.K. PRASAD; M.K. SINGH; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh during the rainy ( kharif) season of 2009, to study the effect of different weed-control measures on mungbean { Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek}. Weed-control treatments significantly increased the grain yield of mungbean over weedy check. Weedy condition for the entire crop season reduced the grain yield by 40.4% (0.589 tonnes/ha) compared to hand-weeding (HW) twice at 20 and 40 days af- ter sowing (0.989 tonnes/ha). Hand-weeding at 20 and 40 days after sowing (DAS) also recorded maximum num- ber of branches/plant, weed-control efficiency, shoot dry weight/plant, nodules number and dry weight/plant fol- lowed by post emergence (PoE) application of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl 50 g/ha + chlorimuron-ethyl 4 g/ha. Highest benefit: cost ratio was obtained with the fenoxaprop-p-ethyl 50 g/ha + chlorimuron-ethyl 4 g/ha (PoE).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-control treatments significantly increased mungbean grain yield over the weedy check.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
Weed-control treatmentse1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
weedy checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on mungbean { Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek}”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–199 · show in text ↑
e1

“Weed-control treatments significantly increased the grain yield of mungbean over weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weedy condition for the whole season reduced mungbean grain yield by 40.4% compared with hand-weeding twice.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
Weedy condition for the entire crop seasone2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
reducede2
Value
40.4%e2
Comparator
hand-weeding (HW) twice at 20 and 40 dayse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on mungbean { Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek}”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–199 · show in text ↑
e2

“Weedy condition for the entire crop season reduced the grain yield by 40.4% (0.589 tonnes/ha) compared to hand-weeding (HW) twice at 20 and 40 days af- ter sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–457 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand-weeding at 20 and 40 DAS gave the maximum branches per plant, weed-control efficiency and shoot dry weight, ahead of post-emergence herbicides.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
Hand-weeding at 20 and 40 days after sowing (DAS)e3
Outcome
weed-control efficiencye3
Direction
maximume3
Comparator
post emergence (PoE) application of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl 50 g/ha + chlorimuron-ethyl 4 g/hae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on mungbean { Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek}”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–199 · show in text ↑
e3

“Hand-weeding at 20 and 40 days after sowing (DAS) also recorded maximum num- ber of branches/plant, weed-control efficiency, shoot dry weight/plant, nodules number and dry weight/plant fol- lowed by post emergence (PoE) application of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl 50 g/ha + chlorimuron-ethyl 4 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand-weeding at 20 and 40 DAS gave the maximum nodule number and nodule dry weight, ahead of post-emergence herbicides.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
Hand-weeding at 20 and 40 days after sowing (DAS)e3
Outcome
nodules number and dry weight/plante3
Direction
maximume3
Comparator
post emergence (PoE) application of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl 50 g/ha + chlorimuron-ethyl 4 g/hae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on mungbean { Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek}”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–199 · show in text ↑
e3

“Hand-weeding at 20 and 40 days after sowing (DAS) also recorded maximum num- ber of branches/plant, weed-control efficiency, shoot dry weight/plant, nodules number and dry weight/plant fol- lowed by post emergence (PoE) application of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl 50 g/ha + chlorimuron-ethyl 4 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence fenoxaprop-p-ethyl plus chlorimuron-ethyl gave the highest benefit: cost ratio.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
fenoxaprop-p-ethyl 50 g/ha + chlorimuron-ethyl 4 g/ha (PoE)e4
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe4
Direction
Higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on mungbean { Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek}”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–199 · show in text ↑
e4

“Highest benefit: cost ratio was obtained with the fenoxaprop-p-ethyl 50 g/ha + chlorimuron-ethyl 4 g/ha (PoE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–876 · show in text ↑

chlorimuron-ethyl · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

climate site · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 4 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 103 positive, 6 negative or no effect

102 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

herbicide · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

73 papers: 73 positive, 0 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.