Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Weed flora as influenced by different weed control practices in Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)

HK Pithiya; KI Patel; JS Desai; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to find out “Weed flora influenced by weed control in Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.). The soil of experimental field was loamy sand in texture with low in organic carbon and available nitrogen, medium in available phosphorus and potassium and having pH value of 7.45. The predominant weed flora observed in experimental field were Cynodon dactylon L., Digitaria sanguinalis L. amongst monocot; dicot weeds like Amaranthus viridis L., Alternanthera pungens., Convolvulus arvensis L., Vernonia cinerea L., Eclipta alba (L.) Hassk, Trianthema portulacastrum., Euphorbia hirta L., Physalis minima L. and sedges like Cyperus rotundus L. Weed free treatment itself indicate the total eradication of the weeds during entire crop growth period hence it may kept as best and superior one. For any weed parameter comparison it may be superior and excluded in the comparison with other weed control treatments. The weed populations of monocot, dicot and sedge at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest were found minimum under the application of ready mixture of clodinafop propargyl + acifluorfen sodium 250 g a.i./ha as PoE at 25 DAS. Besides weed free situation, significantly lower dry weight of weeds were recorded under ready mixture of clodinafop propargyl + acifluorfen sodium 250 g a.i./ha as PoE at 25 DAS. Among the different weed management treatments, the highest WCE and minimum weed index was observed under the weed free treatment followed by treatment ready mixture of clodinafop propargyl + acifluorfen sodium 250 g a.i./ha as PoE at 25 DAS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The field contained a diverse predominant weed flora, including monocots, dicots and sedges.

Taxon
Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Interactor
Cynodon dactylon L.Cynodon dactylone0weed
Outcome
predominant weed florae0
Qualifier
Digitaria sanguinalis L.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · InteractorRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The predominant weed flora observed in experimental field were Cynodon dactylon L., Digitaria sanguinalis L. amongst monocot; dicot weeds like Amaranthus viridis L., Alternanthera pungens., Convolvulus arvensis L., Vernonia cinerea L., Eclipta alba (L.) Hassk, Trianthema portulacastrum., Euphorbia hirta L., Physalis minima L. and sedges like Cyperus rotundus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment eliminated weeds during crop growth.

Taxon
Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
Weed free treatmente0
Outcome
total eradication of the weedse0
Direction
total eradicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed free treatment itself indicate the total eradication of the weeds during entire crop growth period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence clodinafop plus acifluorfen yielded minimum monocot, dicot and sedge weed populations at 30 and 60 DAS and harvest.

Taxon
Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
ready mixture of clodinafop propargyl + acifluorfen sodium 250 g a.i./ha as PoE at 25 DASe0
Outcome
weed populations of monocot, dicot and sedgee0
Direction
minimume0
Qualifier
at 30, 60 DAS and at harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weed populations of monocot, dicot and sedge at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest were found minimum under the application of ready mixture of clodinafop propargyl + acifluorfen sodium 250 g a.i./ha as PoE at 25 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide mixture significantly reduced weed dry weight.

Taxon
Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
ready mixture of clodinafop propargyl + acifluorfen sodium 250 g a.i./ha as PoE at 25 DASe0
Outcome
dry weight of weedse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly lower dry weight of weeds were recorded under ready mixture of clodinafop propargyl + acifluorfen sodium 250 g a.i./ha as PoE at 25 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment gave the highest weed control efficiency, followed by the herbicide mixture.

Taxon
Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
weed free treatmente0
Outcome
WCEe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
ready mixture of clodinafop propargyl + acifluorfen sodium 250 g a.i./ha as PoE at 25 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest WCE and minimum weed index was observed under the weed free treatment followed by treatment ready mixture of clodinafop propargyl + acifluorfen sodium 250 g a.i./ha as PoE at 25 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1567 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment gave the minimum weed index, followed by the herbicide mixture.

Taxon
Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
weed free treatmente0
Outcome
weed indexe0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
ready mixture of clodinafop propargyl + acifluorfen sodium 250 g a.i./ha as PoE at 25 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest WCE and minimum weed index was observed under the weed free treatment followed by treatment ready mixture of clodinafop propargyl + acifluorfen sodium 250 g a.i./ha as PoE at 25 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1567 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–99 · show in text ↑

sodium atom · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

acifluorfen · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

73 papers: 73 positive, 0 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.