Paper · 2018 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Incorporation of rice straw mitigates CH4and N2O emissions in water saving paddy fields of Central Vietnam

Thi Thai Hoa Hoang; Dinh Thuc Do; Thi Thu Giang Tran; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
31
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of rice straw and water regimes on CH4 and N2O emissions from paddy fields for two rice growing seasons (summer 2014 and spring 2015). Water regimes included alternating wet–dry irrigation (AWD) maintained at three levels (–5 cm, – 10 cm and –15 cm) in comparison to continuous flooding irrigation (CF). Rice straw (5 t ha–1) was incorporated into the top soil (0 – 15 cm), distributed and burned in situ. Results showed that using burned in situ rice straw was found to reduce seasonal cumulative CH4 emission (24–34% in summer; 18–28% in spring), N2O emission (21–32% in summer; 22–29% in spring) and lower rice yield (8–9%) than rice straw incorporation into top soil. AWD methods reduced the amount of CH4 production (22.6–41.5%) and increased N2O emission (25–26%) without any decrease in rice yield. Rice straw incorporation into the top soil with AWD had higher water productivity (23–37%) than rice straw when burned in situ with CF. The results conclude that AWD and rice straw management can be employed as mitigation strategy for CH4 and N2O emissions from paddy fields in Central Vietnam.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burned in situ rice straw reduced seasonal cumulative CH4 emission relative to straw incorporated into the top soil.

Treatment
burned in situ rice strawe0
Outcome
seasonal cumulative CH4 emissione0
Direction
reducee0
Value
24–34% in summer; 18–28% in springe0
Comparator
rice straw incorporation into top soile0
Setting
Central Vietnamt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Incorporation of rice straw mitigates CH4and N2O emissions in water saving paddy fields of Central Vietnam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“using burned in situ rice straw was found to reduce seasonal cumulative CH4 emission (24–34% in summer; 18–28% in spring), N2O emission (21–32% in summer; 22–29% in spring) and lower rice yield (8–9%) than rice straw incorporation into top soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burned in situ rice straw reduced seasonal cumulative N2O emission relative to straw incorporated into the top soil.

Treatment
burned in situ rice strawe0
Outcome
N2O emissione0
Direction
reducee0
Value
21–32% in summer; 22–29% in springe0
Comparator
rice straw incorporation into top soile0
Setting
Central Vietnamt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Incorporation of rice straw mitigates CH4and N2O emissions in water saving paddy fields of Central Vietnam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“using burned in situ rice straw was found to reduce seasonal cumulative CH4 emission (24–34% in summer; 18–28% in spring), N2O emission (21–32% in summer; 22–29% in spring) and lower rice yield (8–9%) than rice straw incorporation into top soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burned in situ rice straw lowered rice yield by 8–9% relative to straw incorporated into the top soil.

Treatment
burned in situ rice strawe0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
8–9%e0
Comparator
rice straw incorporation into top soile0
Setting
Central Vietnamt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Incorporation of rice straw mitigates CH4and N2O emissions in water saving paddy fields of Central Vietnam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“using burned in situ rice straw was found to reduce seasonal cumulative CH4 emission (24–34% in summer; 18–28% in spring), N2O emission (21–32% in summer; 22–29% in spring) and lower rice yield (8–9%) than rice straw incorporation into top soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD irrigation reduced CH4 production by 22.6–41.5% relative to continuous flooding.

Treatment
AWD methodse1
Outcome
amount of CH4 productione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
22.6–41.5%e1
Comparator
continuous flooding irrigation (CF)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Incorporation of rice straw mitigates CH4and N2O emissions in water saving paddy fields of Central Vietnam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“AWD methods reduced the amount of CH4 production (22.6–41.5%) and increased N2O emission (25–26%) without any decrease in rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–837 · show in text ↑
e2

“in comparison to continuous flooding irrigation (CF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD irrigation increased N2O emission by 25–26% relative to continuous flooding.

Treatment
AWD methodse1
Outcome
N2O emissione1
Direction
increasede1
Value
25–26%e1
Comparator
continuous flooding irrigation (CF)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Incorporation of rice straw mitigates CH4and N2O emissions in water saving paddy fields of Central Vietnam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“AWD methods reduced the amount of CH4 production (22.6–41.5%) and increased N2O emission (25–26%) without any decrease in rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–837 · show in text ↑
e2

“in comparison to continuous flooding irrigation (CF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD irrigation did not decrease rice yield relative to continuous flooding.

Treatment
AWD methodse1
Outcome
rice yielde1
Direction
without any decreasee1
Comparator
continuous flooding irrigation (CF)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Incorporation of rice straw mitigates CH4and N2O emissions in water saving paddy fields of Central Vietnam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“AWD methods reduced the amount of CH4 production (22.6–41.5%) and increased N2O emission (25–26%) without any decrease in rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–837 · show in text ↑
e2

“in comparison to continuous flooding irrigation (CF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw incorporated into the top soil with AWD had higher water productivity than straw burned in situ with continuous flooding.

Treatment
Rice straw incorporation into the top soil with AWDe3
Outcome
water productivitye3
Direction
highere3
Value
23–37%e3
Comparator
rice straw when burned in situ with CFe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Incorporation of rice straw mitigates CH4and N2O emissions in water saving paddy fields of Central Vietnam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e3

“Rice straw incorporation into the top soil with AWD had higher water productivity (23–37%) than rice straw when burned in situ with CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–973 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

AWD and rice straw management can be employed as a mitigation strategy for CH4 and N2O emissions from paddy fields.

Outcome
mitigation strategy for CH4 and N2O emissionse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Incorporation of rice straw mitigates CH4and N2O emissions in water saving paddy fields of Central Vietnam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e4

“The results conclude that AWD and rice straw management can be employed as mitigation strategy for CH4 and N2O emissions from paddy fields in Central Vietnam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1132 · show in text ↑

fire · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

organic · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fire · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 13 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

irrigation · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 109 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 109 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.