Paper · 2015 · Hortscience Journal of Suez Canal University

Reduction of Nitrate Content in Response to Salicylic Acid in Spinach and Parsley Fertilized with Two Different N-Sources

Elwan M.; M. Elhamahmy

16
claims
48
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Spinach and parsley are hyper-nitrate accumulator vegetables, thereby constituting a possible human healthrisk. For that, pot and two field experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of exogenous salicylic acid (SA)application on yield, nitrate content and another quality parameters in spinach and parsley using two differentammonium fertilizers as ammonium sulfate (A. sulfate) and urea. The results of pot experiment (factorial, 2 x 2)showed that, A. sulfate-fertilized plants produced maximum yield compared to urea-fertilized ones, which companiedwith high level of nitrate content (up to 942.6 and 604.5 mg Kg-1 FW in spinach and parsley, respectively). Applicationof 5 μM of SA reduced nitrate content by about 18 and 10 % in A. sulfate-fertilized plants and by 50 and 7 % in ureafertilized plants, in both spinach and parsley, respectively. Under field conditions, using only urea fertilizer, nitrate wasdecreased to minimum levels, 679.0 and 395.6 mg kg-1 FW, in spinach and parsley, sprayed with 20 and 5 μM-SA,respectively. This reduction was associated with induction of nitrate reductase (NRase) activity. The maximumpercentage of NRase activity over control (74%) was recorded in spinach treated with 20 μM of SA and reached to 60% in parsley treated with 5 μM-SA. Also, spraying of SA increased marketable yield, vitamin C and total free aminoacids contents in both tested leafy vegetables. It was concluded that, SA application preserved nitrate content in safelimit for human consumption.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a pot experiment, ammonium sulfate-fertilized spinach gave maximum yield compared with urea-fertilized spinach.

Treatment
A. sulfate-fertilized plantse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
urea-fertilized onese1
Setting
pot experimente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A. sulfate-fertilized plants produced maximum yield compared to urea-fertilized ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–545 · show in text ↑
e2

“pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–429 · show in text ↑
e3

“in both spinach and parsley, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–857 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate-fertilized spinach had high nitrate content (942.6 mg/kg FW) in the pot experiment.

Treatment
A. sulfate-fertilized plantse1
Outcome
nitrate contente4
Direction
high levele4
Value
942.6e4
Setting
pot experimente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“which companied with high level of nitrate content (up to 942.6 and 604.5 mg Kg-1 FW in spinach and parsley, respectively)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 547–668 · show in text ↑
e1

“A. sulfate-fertilized plants produced maximum yield compared to urea-fertilized ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–545 · show in text ↑
e2

“pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 5 μM SA reduced nitrate content of spinach by 18% in ammonium sulfate-fertilized plants.

Treatment
5 μM of SAe5
Outcome
nitrate contente5
Direction
reducede5
Value
18e5
Qualifier
A. sulfate-fertilized plantse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“5 μM of SA reduced nitrate content by about 18 and 10 % in A. sulfate-fertilized plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–771 · show in text ↑
e3

“in both spinach and parsley, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 5 μM SA reduced nitrate content of urea-fertilized spinach by 50%.

Treatment
5 μM of SAe5
Outcome
nitrate contente5
Direction
reducede5
Value
50e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“5 μM of SA reduced nitrate content by about 18 and 10 % in A. sulfate-fertilized plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–771 · show in text ↑
e6

“by 50 and 7 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–789 · show in text ↑
e3

“in both spinach and parsley, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under field conditions, SA spraying on spinach with urea-only fertilizer reduced nitrate to minimum levels (679.0 mg/kg FW).

Treatment
using only urea fertilizere0
Outcome
nitratee4
Direction
decreased to minimum levelse7
Value
679.0e7
Qualifier
sprayed with 20 and 5 μM-SAe2
Setting
field conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“in both spinach and parsley, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–857 · show in text ↑
e7

“decreased to minimum levels, 679.0 and 395.6 mg kg-1 FW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–977 · show in text ↑
e0

“using only urea fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–909 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–881 · show in text ↑
e2

“sprayed with 20 and 5 μM-SA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1030 · show in text ↑
e4

“nitrate was”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA at 20 μM raised nitrate reductase activity in spinach by 74% over control.

Treatment
20 μM of SAe0
Outcome
nitrate reductase (NRase) activitye1
Direction
inductione1
Value
74%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“in both spinach and parsley, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–857 · show in text ↑
e0

“activity over control (74%) was recorded in spinach treated with 20 μM of SA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1236 · show in text ↑
e1

“induction of nitrate reductase (NRase) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA spraying increased marketable yield and vitamin C of spinach.

Treatment
spraying of SAe0
Outcome
marketable yield, vitamin Ce0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“which companied with high level of nitrate content (up to 942.6 and 604.5 mg Kg-1 FW in spinach and parsley, respectively)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 547–668 · show in text ↑
e0

“spraying of SA increased marketable yield, vitamin C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1347 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a pot experiment, ammonium sulfate-fertilized parsley gave maximum yield compared with urea-fertilized parsley.

Treatment
A. sulfate-fertilized plantse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
urea-fertilized onese1
Setting
pot experimente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petroselinum crispum
Petroselinum crispum · TaxonVítor Jorge · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A. sulfate-fertilized plants produced maximum yield compared to urea-fertilized ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–545 · show in text ↑
e2

“pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–429 · show in text ↑
e3

“in both spinach and parsley, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–857 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate-fertilized parsley had high nitrate content (604.5 mg/kg FW) in the pot experiment.

Treatment
A. sulfate-fertilized plantse1
Outcome
nitrate contente4
Direction
high levele4
Value
604.5e4
Setting
pot experimente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petroselinum crispum
Petroselinum crispum · TaxonVítor Jorge · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e4

“which companied with high level of nitrate content (up to 942.6 and 604.5 mg Kg-1 FW in spinach and parsley, respectively)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 547–668 · show in text ↑
e1

“A. sulfate-fertilized plants produced maximum yield compared to urea-fertilized ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–545 · show in text ↑
e2

“pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 5 μM SA reduced nitrate content of parsley by 10% in ammonium sulfate-fertilized plants.

Treatment
5 μM of SAe5
Outcome
nitrate contente5
Direction
reducede5
Value
10 %e5
Qualifier
A. sulfate-fertilized plantse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petroselinum crispum
Petroselinum crispum · TaxonVítor Jorge · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e5

“5 μM of SA reduced nitrate content by about 18 and 10 % in A. sulfate-fertilized plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–771 · show in text ↑
e3

“in both spinach and parsley, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 5 μM SA reduced nitrate content of urea-fertilized parsley by 7%.

Treatment
5 μM of SAe5
Outcome
nitrate contente5
Direction
reducede5
Value
7 %e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petroselinum crispum
Petroselinum crispum · TaxonVítor Jorge · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e5

“5 μM of SA reduced nitrate content by about 18 and 10 % in A. sulfate-fertilized plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–771 · show in text ↑
e6

“by 50 and 7 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–789 · show in text ↑
e3

“in both spinach and parsley, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under field conditions, SA spraying on parsley with urea-only fertilizer reduced nitrate to minimum levels (395.6 mg/kg FW).

Treatment
using only urea fertilizere0
Outcome
nitratee4
Direction
decreased to minimum levelse7
Value
395.6e7
Qualifier
sprayed with 20 and 5 μM-SAe2
Setting
field conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petroselinum crispum
Petroselinum crispum · TaxonVítor Jorge · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e3

“in both spinach and parsley, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–857 · show in text ↑
e7

“decreased to minimum levels, 679.0 and 395.6 mg kg-1 FW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–977 · show in text ↑
e0

“using only urea fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–909 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–881 · show in text ↑
e2

“sprayed with 20 and 5 μM-SA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1030 · show in text ↑
e4

“nitrate was”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA at 5 μM raised nitrate reductase activity in parsley by 60%.

Treatment
5 μM-SAe2
Outcome
nitrate reductase (NRase) activitye1
Direction
inductione1
Value
60%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petroselinum crispum
Petroselinum crispum · TaxonVítor Jorge · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e3

“in both spinach and parsley, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–857 · show in text ↑
e2

“reached to 60% in parsley treated with 5 μM-SA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1287 · show in text ↑
e1

“induction of nitrate reductase (NRase) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA spraying increased marketable yield and vitamin C of parsley.

Treatment
spraying of SAe0
Outcome
marketable yield, vitamin Ce0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petroselinum crispum
Petroselinum crispum · TaxonVítor Jorge · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e4

“which companied with high level of nitrate content (up to 942.6 and 604.5 mg Kg-1 FW in spinach and parsley, respectively)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 547–668 · show in text ↑
e0

“spraying of SA increased marketable yield, vitamin C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1347 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in nitrate in spinach and parsley was associated with induction of nitrate reductase activity.

Gene
nitrate reductase (NRase)e0
Outcome
reductione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Petroselinum crispum
Petroselinum crispum · TaxonVítor Jorge · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e3

“in both spinach and parsley, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–857 · show in text ↑
e0

“This reduction was associated with induction of nitrate reductase (NRase) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1127 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

SA application kept nitrate content of spinach and parsley within a safe limit for human consumption.

Outcome
nitrate contente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Petroselinum crispum
Petroselinum crispum · TaxonVítor Jorge · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e3

“in both spinach and parsley, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–857 · show in text ↑
e1

“SA application preserved nitrate content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1479 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: enzyme activity · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Petroselinum crispum (parsley)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Petroselinum crispum (parsley)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · quality: phytochemicals · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 21 positive, 14 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 53 positive, 7 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.