Paper · 1989 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Low CO2 Prevents Nitrate Reduction in Leaves

Werner M. Kaiser; Jutta Förster

12
claims
35
verbatim quotes
131
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The correlation between CO(2) assimilation and nitrate reduction in detached spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves was examined by measuring light-dependent changes in leaf nitrate levels in response to mild water stress and to artificially imposed CO(2) deficiency. The level of extractable nitrate reductase (NR) activity was also measured. The results are: (a) In the light, detached turgid spinach leaves reduced nitrate stored in the vacuoles of mesophyll cells at rates between 3 and 10 micromoles per milligram of chlorophyll per hour. Nitrate fed through the petiole was reduced at similar rates as storage nitrate. Nitrate reduction was accompanied by malate accumulation. (b) Under mild water stress which caused stomatal closure, nitrate reduction was prevented. The inhibition of nitrate reduction observed in water stressed leaves was reversed by external CO(2) concentrations (10-15%) high enough to overcome stomatal resistance. (c) Nitrate reduction was also inhibited when turgid leaves were kept in CO(2)-free air or at the CO(2)-compensation point or in nitrogen. (d) When leaves were illuminated in CO(2)-free air, activity of NR decreased rapidly. It increased again, when CO(2) was added back to the system. The half-time for a 50% change in activity was about 30 min. It thus appears that there is a rapid inactivation/activation mechanism of NR in leaves which couples nitrate reductase to net photosynthesis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turgid spinach leaves reduced stored nitrate at 3 to 10 micromoles per milligram chlorophyll per hour in light.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
reduced nitrate stored in the vacuoles of mesophyll cellse0
Value
3 and 10 micromoles per milligram of chlorophyll per houre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“detached turgid spinach leaves reduced nitrate stored in the vacuoles of mesophyll cells at rates between 3 and 10 micromoles per milligram of chlorophyll per hour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–541 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Petiole fed nitrate was reduced at rates similar to stored nitrate.

Outcome
Nitrate fed through the petiole was reducede0
Direction
similar ratese0
Comparator
storage nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate fed through the petiole was reduced at similar rates as storage nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“detached spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–114 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate reduction was accompanied by malate accumulation.

Compound
malatee0
Outcome
Nitrate reductione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate reduction was accompanied by malate accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“detached spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mild water stress with stomatal closure prevented nitrate reduction.

Treatment
mild water stresse0
Outcome
nitrate reductione0
Direction
preventede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under mild water stress which caused stomatal closure, nitrate reduction was prevented”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“detached spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

External CO2 at 10-15% reversed nitrate reduction inhibition in water stressed leaves.

Treatment
external CO(2) concentrations (10-15%)e0
Outcome
inhibition of nitrate reductione0
Direction
reversede0
Value
10-15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibition of nitrate reduction observed in water stressed leaves was reversed by external CO(2) concentrations (10-15%) high enough to overcome stomatal resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“detached spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 free air inhibited nitrate reduction in turgid leaves.

Treatment
CO(2)-free aire0
Outcome
Nitrate reductione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate reduction was also inhibited when turgid leaves were kept in CO(2)-free air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“detached spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 compensation point conditions inhibited nitrate reduction.

Treatment
CO(2)-compensation pointe0
Outcome
Nitrate reductione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate reduction was also inhibited when turgid leaves were kept in CO(2)-free air or at the CO(2)-compensation point or in nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“detached spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen atmosphere inhibited nitrate reduction.

Treatment
nitrogene0
Outcome
Nitrate reductione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate reduction was also inhibited when turgid leaves were kept in CO(2)-free air or at the CO(2)-compensation point or in nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“detached spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate reductase activity decreased rapidly under light in CO2 free air.

Treatment
CO(2)-free aire0
Gene
NRe0
Outcome
activity of NRe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When leaves were illuminated in CO(2)-free air, activity of NR decreased rapidly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“detached spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate reductase activity increased again when CO2 was restored.

Treatment
CO(2) was added backe0
Outcome
activity of NRe2
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It increased again, when CO(2) was added back to the system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“detached spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“activity of NR decreased rapidly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1167 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate reductase activity changed by 50% with an approximately 30 minute half-time.

Outcome
change in activitye0
Value
30 mine0
Qualifier
50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The half-time for a 50% change in activity was about 30 min”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“detached spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–114 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapid nitrate reductase activation and inactivation couples the enzyme to net photosynthesis.

Gene
NRe0
Outcome
couples nitrate reductase to net photosynthesise0
Qualifier
rapid inactivation/activation mechanisme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is a rapid inactivation/activation mechanism of NR in leaves which couples nitrate reductase to net photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1432 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“detached spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–114 · show in text ↑

co2 · disease · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 21 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

drought · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

co2 · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.