Paper · 2009

Control of grape powdery mildew with synthetic, biological, and organic fungicides: 2009 field trials - eScholarship

Christopher N. Janousek; Ian S. Bay; W. D. Gubler

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Powdery mildew is an economically-important pathogen of grapes worldwide. This report details the findings of our annual powdery mildew fungicide trials on grapevine cultivar Chardonnay (Vitis vinifera). The trials were conducted at Herzog Ranch, near Courtland, California in 2009. Treatments were placed in five adjacent trials in the vineyard. Spraying commenced in mid April, shortly after a heavy rainfall event that likely promoted the release of powdery mildew (Uncinula necator) ascospores from overwintering chasmothecia. Spraying was completed in mid July and treatments were evaluated for disease incidence and severity on 21 July 2009, at about the beginning of veraison. Trial I consisted of IR-4-funded biofungicide research that focused on two products: caprylic acid (a novel control agent in current development) and Actinovate (a registered product containing the bacterium Streptomyces lydicus WYEC106). Trials II-V included various fungicide products (either currently registered or in various stages of product development) including strobilurins, demethylase inhibitors, oils, and other materials. Spray frequencies varied from weekly applications to 21 day intervals. Temperatures were mild during much of the 2009 growing season, providing optimal conditions for the asexual reproduction and dispersal of powdery mildew. Risk index data was high from about mid-May through the rest of the evaluation period and the pathogen quickly colonized leaves. Disease pressure was higher than in similar trials conducted in 2007 or 2008. By mid-June, heavy to severe mildew was evident on untreated clusters. Treatment performances varied widely. Biological fungicides generally reduced disease severity, but were more effective when used in a combination program with synthetic materials. As a stand-alone product, caprylic acid was most effective when applied weekly at a concentration of 0.3% (v/v). At a concentration of 0.5% it consistently showed phytotoxic effects on berries. A few organic materials performed well, lowering disease severity to <10%: paraffinic oil + Foliar Supreme (sulfur + nutrient cocktail) and two types of fertilizers alternated with trifloxystrobin. Among synthetic products, difenoconzaole + cyprodinil, flutriafol, fluopyram, fluopyram + tebuconazole, quinoxyfen + alcohol ethoxylate (an adjuvant), various GWN4617 treatments, picoxystrobin, penthiopyrad, boscalid + pyraclostrobin alternated with triflumizole, and metrafenone gave good to excellent control of disease severity on fruit. These trials easily separate highly effective materials from those which give only moderate control of powdery mildew, however long-term assessment of treatment efficacy is best evaluated with experiments conducted at multiple locations, across several growing seasons, and on multiple grape cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease pressure exceeded that in 2007 and 2008 trials.

Taxon
grapevine cultivar Chardonnay (Vitis vinifera)Vitis viniferat0
Interactor
Uncinula necatorErysiphe necatore1pathogen
Outcome
Disease pressuree0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
similar trials conducted in 2007 or 2008e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erysiphe necator
Erysiphe necator · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBenjamin Vanegtern · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease pressure was higher than in similar trials conducted in 2007 or 2008.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine cultivar Chardonnay (Vitis vinifera)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“powdery mildew (Uncinula necator)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–486 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated clusters had heavy to severe mildew by mid-June.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Organ / stage
clusterse0
Treatment
untreatede0
Outcome
heavy to severe mildewe0
Qualifier
By mid-Junee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By mid-June, heavy to severe mildew was evident on untreated clusters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1622 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine cultivar Chardonnay (Vitis vinifera)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological fungicides generally reduced disease severity.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
Biological fungicidese0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biological fungicides generally reduced disease severity, but were more effective when used in a combination program with synthetic materials.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1803 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine cultivar Chardonnay (Vitis vinifera)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological fungicides were more effective in combination with synthetic materials.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
combination program with synthetic materialse0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
Biological fungicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biological fungicides generally reduced disease severity, but were more effective when used in a combination program with synthetic materials.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1803 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine cultivar Chardonnay (Vitis vinifera)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly 0.3% caprylic acid was the most effective stand-alone application.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
caprylic acide0
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
0.3% (v/v)e0
Qualifier
applied weeklye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As a stand-alone product, caprylic acid was most effective when applied weekly at a concentration of 0.3% (v/v).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1804–1916 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine cultivar Chardonnay (Vitis vinifera)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Caprylic acid at 0.5% consistently caused berry phytotoxicity.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
caprylic acide1
Outcome
phytotoxic effects on berriese0
Value
0.5%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At a concentration of 0.5% it consistently showed phytotoxic effects on berries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1917–1997 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine cultivar Chardonnay (Vitis vinifera)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“caprylic acid was most effective when applied weekly at a concentration of 0.3% (v/v)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1830–1915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraffinic oil plus Foliar Supreme lowered disease severity below 10%.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
paraffinic oil + Foliar Supreme (sulfur + nutrient cocktail)e0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
loweringe0
Value
<10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowering disease severity to <10%: paraffinic oil + Foliar Supreme (sulfur + nutrient cocktail) and two types of fertilizers alternated with trifloxystrobin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2038–2195 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine cultivar Chardonnay (Vitis vinifera)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizers alternated with trifloxystrobin lowered disease severity below 10%.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
two types of fertilizers alternated with trifloxystrobine0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
loweringe0
Value
<10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowering disease severity to <10%: paraffinic oil + Foliar Supreme (sulfur + nutrient cocktail) and two types of fertilizers alternated with trifloxystrobin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2038–2195 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine cultivar Chardonnay (Vitis vinifera)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Listed synthetic fungicides gave good to excellent fruit disease control.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
synthetic productse0
Outcome
disease severity on fruite0
Direction
good to excellent controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among synthetic products, difenoconzaole + cyprodinil, flutriafol, fluopyram, fluopyram + tebuconazole, quinoxyfen + alcohol ethoxylate (an adjuvant), various GWN4617 treatments, picoxystrobin, penthiopyrad, boscalid + pyraclostrobin alternated with triflumizole, and metrafenone gave good to excellent control of disease severity on fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2196–2536 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine cultivar Chardonnay (Vitis vinifera)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–202 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

trifloxystrobin · disease · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fungicide · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

26 papers: 22 positive, 4 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

application · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

56 papers: 50 positive, 6 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.