Paper · 2002 · Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research

Integration of strobilurins and other fungicides for the control of powdery mildew on grapes

T.J. WICKS; C.J. HITCH

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The strobilurin fungicides Amistar (azoxystrobin) and Flint (trifloxystrobin) were evaluated in 1999/00 and 2000/01 in programs that included various combinations with Thiovit (sulfur) and Topas (penconazole) for the control of powdery mildew on grapes. In most experiments the application of 6 sprays per season that included Thiovit (3 g/L) followed by various combinations of Topas (0.125 mL/L), Amistar (0.5 g/L), Flint (0.15 g/L) and Thiovit (2 g/L) controlled powdery mildew. Although strobilurins were applied from flowering to after fruit set, the order in which various fungicides were applied had little influence on the level of powdery mildew control. In experiments where the bunch or leaf area diseased was 60% or higher in unsprayed plots, the severity was less than 5% where combinations of Thiovit and Topas with either Amistar or Flint were applied. In one experiment, 3 applications of either Legend (quinoxyfen) or Prosper (spiroxamine) following 2 applications of Thiovit also provided excellent control of powdery mildew. In programs where the application of Amistar and Flint were directly compared, Flint was the most effective fungicide for controlling powdery mildew. In the experiments where downy mildew also developed, Amistar was more effective than Flint in controlling this disease.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Programs of six sprays per season with Thiovit, Topas, Amistar, Flint and Thiovit controlled powdery mildew in most experiments.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
6 sprays per season that included Thiovit (3 g/L) followed by various combinations of Topas (0.125 mL/L), Amistar (0.5 g/L), Flint (0.15 g/L) and Thiovit (2 g/L)e1
Interactor
powdery mildewe1pathogen
Outcome
powdery mildewe1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“for the control of powdery mildew on grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–252 · show in text ↑
e1

“In most experiments the application of 6 sprays per season that included Thiovit (3 g/L) followed by various combinations of Topas (0.125 mL/L), Amistar (0.5 g/L), Flint (0.15 g/L) and Thiovit (2 g/L) controlled powdery mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The order in which the fungicides were applied had little influence on the level of powdery mildew control.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
order in which various fungicides were appliede2
Interactor
powdery mildewe2pathogen
Outcome
level of powdery mildew controle2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“for the control of powdery mildew on grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–252 · show in text ↑
e2

“Although strobilurins were applied from flowering to after fruit set, the order in which various fungicides were applied had little influence on the level of powdery mildew control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Where unsprayed plots had 60% or higher bunch or leaf area diseased, combinations of Thiovit and Topas with Amistar or Flint kept severity below 5%.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
combinations of Thiovit and Topas with either Amistar or Flinte3
Outcome
severitye3
Direction
less thane3
Value
5%e3
Qualifier
60% or highere3
Comparator
unsprayed plotse3

Verbatim

e0

“for the control of powdery mildew on grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–252 · show in text ↑
e3

“In experiments where the bunch or leaf area diseased was 60% or higher in unsprayed plots, the severity was less than 5% where combinations of Thiovit and Topas with either Amistar or Flint were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three applications of Legend or Prosper after two applications of Thiovit gave excellent control of powdery mildew in one experiment.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
3 applications of either Legend (quinoxyfen) or Prosper (spiroxamine) following 2 applications of Thiovite4
Interactor
powdery mildewe4pathogen
Outcome
control of powdery mildewe4
Qualifier
excellent controle4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“for the control of powdery mildew on grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–252 · show in text ↑
e4

“In one experiment, 3 applications of either Legend (quinoxyfen) or Prosper (spiroxamine) following 2 applications of Thiovit also provided excellent control of powdery mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flint was the most effective fungicide for controlling powdery mildew when compared directly with Amistar.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
Flinte5
Interactor
powdery mildewe5pathogen
Outcome
controlling powdery mildewe5
Direction
most effectivee5
Comparator
Amistare5

Verbatim

e0

“for the control of powdery mildew on grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–252 · show in text ↑
e5

“In programs where the application of Amistar and Flint were directly compared, Flint was the most effective fungicide for controlling powdery mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amistar was more effective than Flint in controlling downy mildew in experiments where downy mildew also developed.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
Amistare6
Interactor
downy mildewPeronosporaceaee6pathogen
Outcome
controlling this diseasee6
Direction
more effectivee6
Comparator
Flinte6

Verbatim

e0

“for the control of powdery mildew on grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–252 · show in text ↑
e6

“In the experiments where downy mildew also developed, Amistar was more effective than Flint in controlling this disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1313 · show in text ↑

quinoxyfen · disease · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

climate site · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fungicide · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

26 papers: 22 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

application · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

56 papers: 50 positive, 6 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.