Paper · 2017 · Planta Daninha

APPLICATION OF PRE AND POST EMERGENCE HERBICIDE UNDER IMPROVED FIELD IRRIGATION SYSTEM PROVED A SUSTAINABLE WEED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY IN COTTON CROP

A. HAKOOMAT; M. AROOJ; N. SARWAR; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

ABSTRACT Successful weed control in cotton crop is an imperative as weeds not only reduce the cotton production but also deteriorate the lint quality and harbor insect pest. Thus a field study was carried out to evaluate the various weed control strategies under different irrigation systems. Pendimethlin (pre-emergence), S-metolachlor (pre-emergence), glyphosate (post emergence) were used alone or in combination as chemical weedicides along with mechanical weeding under drip and furrow irrigation systems. Results showed that all the weed control treatments with drip irrigation significantly decrease weed density compared with weed control treatments where watering was practiced through furrow irrigation method. However, combined application of pendimethalin with glyphosate and S-metolachlor has significantly reduced the weed density. This combination also resulted in improved bolls per plant, boll weight, sympodial branches, seed cotton yield, ginning out turn, seed index, lint index and water use efficiency. These parameters were also improved under drip irrigation as compared to furrow irrigation system. In a nutshell it can be concluded that combination of post and pre-emergence herbicides improved the cotton lint yield and water productivity which can be further improved by adopting drip irrigation as appropriate irrigation system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control treatments under drip irrigation decreased weed density versus furrow irrigation.

Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
furrow irrigation methode0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the weed control treatments with drip irrigation significantly decrease weed density compared with weed control treatments where watering was practiced through furrow irrigation method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined herbicide application significantly reduced weed density.

Treatment
combined application of pendimethalin with glyphosate and S-metolachlore0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of pendimethalin with glyphosate and S-metolachlor has significantly reduced the weed density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined herbicide application improved boll traits, seed cotton yield, ginning out turn, seed and lint indices, and water use efficiency.

Treatment
This combinatione0
Outcome
bolls per plant, boll weight, sympodial branchese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This combination also resulted in improved bolls per plant, boll weight, sympodial branches, seed cotton yield, ginning out turn, seed index, lint index and water use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation improved the reported cotton performance traits compared with furrow irrigation.

Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
These parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
furrow irrigation systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These parameters were also improved under drip irrigation as compared to furrow irrigation system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–142 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combined pre- and post-emergence herbicides and drip irrigation for cotton lint yield and water productivity.

Outcome
cotton lint yield and water productivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination of post and pre-emergence herbicides improved the cotton lint yield and water productivity which can be further improved by adopting drip irrigation as appropriate irrigation system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1357 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 31 positive, 6 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

irrigation · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.