Abstract
A field trial was conducted in farmer’s field to evaluate the supplemental irrigation of cotton based intercropping system on weed dynamics under rainfed Vertisols during Kharif season of 2018-19. The treatments in vertical strip plot includes no supplemental irrigation (SI0) (rainfed), supplemental irrigation at vegetative stage (SI1), supplemental irrigation at squaring to peak flowering stage (SI2), supplemental irrigation at boll formation stage (SI3), supplemental irrigation at above mentioned all stages of cotton (SI4) and supplemental irrigation at wilting symptom appearance (SI5). Horizontal strip includes cotton alone (IC0), cotton + blackgram (1:3) (IC1), cotton + clusterbean (1:3) (IC2) and cotton + coriander (1:4) (IC3). Depending on the time of irrigation, the cotton equivalent yield, weed density and weed dry weight differed among supplemental irrigation treatments. But, lower value of cotton equivalent yield, weed density and dry weight was observed in control (No supplemental irrigation). Higher value of cotton equivalent yield, weed density was observed in supplemental irrigation at wilting symptom appearance. Lower weed density and weed dry weight was recorded in cotton + clusterbean (1:3) at 30 DAS and 60 DAS. Increase in plant population and canopy coverage caused increased weed smothering in cotton + clusterbean (1:3) by 25.3 to 39.5 per cent.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
No supplemental irrigation had lower cotton equivalent yield.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume1 - Treatment
- No supplemental irrigatione1
- Outcome
- cotton equivalent yielde1
- Direction
- lowere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“lower value of cotton equivalent yield, weed density and dry weight was observed in control (No supplemental irrigation)”
Claim · model-written summary
No supplemental irrigation had lower weed density and dry weight.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- No supplemental irrigatione1
- Interactor
- weede2weed
- Outcome
- weed density and dry weighte1
- Direction
- lowere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“lower value of cotton equivalent yield, weed density and dry weight was observed in control (No supplemental irrigation)”
e2“weed dynamics”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at wilting symptoms produced higher cotton equivalent yield.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- supplemental irrigation at wilting symptom appearancee1
- Outcome
- cotton equivalent yielde1
- Direction
- Highere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Higher value of cotton equivalent yield, weed density was observed in supplemental irrigation at wilting symptom appearance”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at wilting symptoms produced higher weed density.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- supplemental irrigation at wilting symptom appearancee1
- Interactor
- weede2weed
- Outcome
- weed densitye1
- Direction
- Highere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Higher value of cotton equivalent yield, weed density was observed in supplemental irrigation at wilting symptom appearance”
e2“weed dynamics”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton plus clusterbean had lower weed density and dry weight at 30 and 60 DAS.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- cotton + clusterbean (1:3)e1
- Interactor
- weede1weed
- Outcome
- weed density and weed dry weighte1
- Direction
- Lowere1
- Qualifier
- 30 DAS and 60 DASe1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Lower weed density and weed dry weight was recorded in cotton + clusterbean (1:3) at 30 DAS and 60 DAS”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton plus clusterbean increased weed smothering by 25.3 to 39.5 per cent through greater plant population and canopy cover.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- cotton + clusterbean (1:3)e1
- Interactor
- weede1weed
- Outcome
- weed smotheringe1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 25.3 to 39.5 per cente1
- Qualifier
- Increase in plant population and canopy coveragee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Increase in plant population and canopy coverage caused increased weed smothering in cotton + clusterbean (1:3) by 25.3 to 39.5 per cent”
The same questions in other papers
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
irrigation · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
303 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
395 papers more in this group
See all 399 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.