Abstract
Post-emergence application of Man 77569 and glyphosate each at 1.8 and 3.6 kg ha−1 was equally effective in controlling weeds. Cotton yield increased significantly with two hand weedings done at 30 and 60 days after sowing over other treatments, only Man 77569 and glyphosate at 3.6 kg ha−1 could yield at par with two hand weedings. Competition with weeds in weedy plots caused 79.1% reduction in cotton yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Post-emergence Man 77569 and glyphosate at 1.8 and 3.6 kg/ha were equally effective in controlling weeds in cotton.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutume1 - Treatment
- Post-emergence application of Man 77569 and glyphosate each at 1.8 and 3.6 kg ha−1e0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- controlling weedse0
- Direction
- equally effectivee0
- Comparator
- glyphosatee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Post-emergence application of Man 77569 and glyphosate each at 1.8 and 3.6 kg ha−1 was equally effective in controlling weeds”
e1“Cotton yield increased significantly with two hand weedings done at 30 and 60 days after sowing over other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Two hand weedings at 30 and 60 days after sowing increased cotton yield significantly over other treatments.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- two hand weedings done at 30 and 60 days after sowinge1
- Outcome
- Cotton yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Cotton yield increased significantly with two hand weedings done at 30 and 60 days after sowing over other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Man 77569 and glyphosate at 3.6 kg/ha gave cotton yield at par with two hand weedings.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- Man 77569 and glyphosate at 3.6 kg ha−1e2
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Direction
- at pare2
- Comparator
- two hand weedingse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“only Man 77569 and glyphosate at 3.6 kg ha−1 could yield at par with two hand weedings”
e1“Cotton yield increased significantly with two hand weedings done at 30 and 60 days after sowing over other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Competition with weeds in weedy plots reduced cotton yield by 79.1%.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume3
- Treatment
- Competition with weeds in weedy plotse3
- Interactor
- weedse3weed
- Outcome
- cotton yielde3
- Direction
- reductione3
- Value
- 79.1%e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Competition with weeds in weedy plots caused 79.1% reduction in cotton yield”
The same questions in other papers
glyphosate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →glyphosate · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →herbicide · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
104 papers more in this group
See all 108 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.