Paper · 2017 · Journal of Biological Control

Toxicity of insecticides to Aenasius arizonensis (Girault) (=Aenasius bambawalei Hayat), a solitary endoparasitoid of Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley on Bt cotton under semi-field conditions

PRASUN KARMAKAR; P. S. SHERA

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The toxicity of different insecticides was assessed against Aenasius arizonensis (Girault) (=Aenasius bambawalei Hayat) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), a key endoparasitoid of Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on Bt cotton under semi-field conditions at the Entomological Research Farm, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana during kharif, 2015. Eight insecticides, viz. profenophos 50 EC, thiodicarb 75 WP, buprofezin 25 EC, imidacloprid 17.8 SL, flonicamid 50 WG, spiromesifen 240 SC, diafenthiuron 50 WP and sulfoxaflor 24 SC were sprayed at recommended field doses on potted cotton plants having parasitized mealybugs (mummies). Based on the per cent reduction in adult emergence over control, spiromesifen (11.11 %), buprofezin (11.11 %) and flonicamid (12.11 %) were categorized as harmless; imidacloprid (28.28 %) as slightly harmful; diafenthiuron (55.56 %) and thiodicarb (70.70 %) as moderately harmful, whereas, profenophos (100.0 %) and sulfoxaflor (100.0 %) were highly toxic to the parasitoid. Insecticides like spiromesifen, buprofezin and flonicamid can be viable option for use in integrated pest management strategies against sucking insect pests in cotton ecosystem.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spiromesifen reduced adult parasitoid emergence by 11.11% relative to control and was categorized as harmless.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
spiromesifene0
Interactor
Aenasius arizonensisAenasius arizonensise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
adult emergencee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
11.11 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the per cent reduction in adult emergence over control, spiromesifen (11.11 %), buprofezin (11.11 %) and flonicamid (12.11 %) were categorized as harmless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–161 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aenasius arizonensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Buprofezin reduced adult parasitoid emergence by 11.11% relative to control and was categorized as harmless.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
buprofezine0
Outcome
adult emergencee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
11.11 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the per cent reduction in adult emergence over control, spiromesifen (11.11 %), buprofezin (11.11 %) and flonicamid (12.11 %) were categorized as harmless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flonicamid reduced adult parasitoid emergence by 12.11% relative to control and was categorized as harmless.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
flonicamide0
Outcome
adult emergencee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
12.11 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the per cent reduction in adult emergence over control, spiromesifen (11.11 %), buprofezin (11.11 %) and flonicamid (12.11 %) were categorized as harmless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid reduced adult parasitoid emergence by 28.28% relative to control and was slightly harmful.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
imidaclopride0
Outcome
adult emergencee1
Direction
reductione1
Value
28.28 %e0
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“imidacloprid (28.28 %) as slightly harmful”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–863 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduction in adult emergence over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diafenthiuron reduced adult parasitoid emergence by 55.56% relative to control and was moderately harmful.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
diafenthiurone0
Outcome
adult emergencee1
Direction
reductione1
Value
55.56 %e0
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“diafenthiuron (55.56 %) and thiodicarb (70.70 %) as moderately harmful”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–935 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduction in adult emergence over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiodicarb reduced adult parasitoid emergence by 70.70% relative to control and was moderately harmful.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
thiodicarbe0
Outcome
adult emergencee1
Direction
reductione1
Value
70.70 %e0
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“diafenthiuron (55.56 %) and thiodicarb (70.70 %) as moderately harmful”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–935 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduction in adult emergence over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profenophos reduced adult parasitoid emergence by 100.0% relative to control and was highly toxic.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
profenophose0
Outcome
adult emergencee1
Direction
reductione1
Value
100.0 %e0
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“profenophos (100.0 %) and sulfoxaflor (100.0 %) were highly toxic to the parasitoid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1029 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduction in adult emergence over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfoxaflor reduced adult parasitoid emergence by 100.0% relative to control and was highly toxic.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
sulfoxaflore0
Outcome
adult emergencee1
Direction
reductione1
Value
100.0 %e0
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“profenophos (100.0 %) and sulfoxaflor (100.0 %) were highly toxic to the parasitoid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1029 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduction in adult emergence over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–161 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend spiromesifen, buprofezin and flonicamid as viable options for integrated pest management of sucking cotton pests.

Treatment
spiromesifen, buprofezin and flonicamide0
Outcome
viable option for use in integrated pest management strategiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insecticides like spiromesifen, buprofezin and flonicamid can be viable option for use in integrated pest management strategies against sucking insect pests in cotton ecosystem.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1208 · show in text ↑

thiodicarb · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

sulfoxaflor · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

buprofezin · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

diafenthiuron · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

flonicamid · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

imidacloprid · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.