Paper · 2017 · Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Evaluation of new molecules against sucking pests of Bt cotton

PW Nemade; TH Rathod; SB Deshmukh; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of new molecules as well as biopesticides as foliar application against major sucking pests and toxicity against predators of these pests of Bt cotton at Cotton Research Unit Farm, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeth, Akola during 2015-2016 with eight treatment and three replications. Overall, three sprays were carried out and thus, the data obtained revealed that, newer molecule flonicamid 50% WG @ 100 g a.i./ha was found promising to managed the major sucking pests of Bt cotton followed by flonicamid 50% WG @ 75 g a.i./ha, buprofezin 25% SC @ 250 g a.i./ha and diafenthiuron 50% WP 300 g a.i./ha. However, during the present studies no deleterious effect of insecticidal treatments was observed on population of natural enemies. Highest seed cotton yield (1681.02 Kg/ha.) was obtained from flonicamid 50% WG @ 75 g a.i./ha followed by flonicamid 50% WG @ 100 g a.i./ha (1627.31 Kg/ha.). Next effective treatments were diafenthiuron 50% WP @ 300 g a.i./ha, buprofezin 25% SC @ 250 g a.i./ha, NSKE 5 % and V. lecanii @ 5 gm/lit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flonicamid 50% WG at 100 g a.i./ha was promising for managing the major sucking pests of Bt cotton.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
flonicamid 50% WG @ 100 g a.i./hae1
Interactor
sucking pestse1pest
Outcome
managed the major sucking pestse1
Direction
promisinge1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The present experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of new molecules as well as biopesticides as foliar application against major sucking pests and toxicity against predators of these pests of Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“newer molecule flonicamid 50% WG @ 100 g a.i./ha was found promising to managed the major sucking pests of Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flonicamid 50% WG at 75 g a.i./ha gave the highest seed cotton yield (1681.02 Kg/ha).

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
flonicamid 50% WG @ 75 g a.i./hae4
Outcome
seed cotton yielde4
Direction
Higheste4
Value
1681.02 Kg/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The present experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of new molecules as well as biopesticides as foliar application against major sucking pests and toxicity against predators of these pests of Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–212 · show in text ↑
e4

“Highest seed cotton yield (1681.02 Kg/ha.) was obtained from flonicamid 50% WG @ 75 g a.i./ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flonicamid 50% WG at 100 g a.i./ha was followed by a seed cotton yield of 1627.31 Kg/ha.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
flonicamid 50% WG @ 100 g a.i./hae5
Outcome
seed cotton yielde4
Direction
followed bye5
Value
1627.31 Kg/hae5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The present experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of new molecules as well as biopesticides as foliar application against major sucking pests and toxicity against predators of these pests of Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–212 · show in text ↑
e4

“Highest seed cotton yield (1681.02 Kg/ha.) was obtained from flonicamid 50% WG @ 75 g a.i./ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–896 · show in text ↑
e5

“followed by flonicamid 50% WG @ 100 g a.i./ha (1627.31 Kg/ha.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticidal treatments had no deleterious effect on the population of natural enemies of Bt cotton pests.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
insecticidal treatmentse3
Interactor
natural enemiese3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
population of natural enemiese3
Direction
no deleterious effecte3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The present experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of new molecules as well as biopesticides as foliar application against major sucking pests and toxicity against predators of these pests of Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–212 · show in text ↑
e3

“no deleterious effect of insecticidal treatments was observed on population of natural enemies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flonicamid 50% WG at 75 g a.i./ha, buprofezin and diafenthiuron were also promising for managing the major sucking pests of Bt cotton.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
flonicamid 50% WG @ 75 g a.i./ha, buprofezin 25% SC @ 250 g a.i./ha and diafenthiuron 50% WP 300 g a.i./hae2
Interactor
sucking pestse1pest
Outcome
managed the major sucking pestse1
Direction
promisinge1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The present experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of new molecules as well as biopesticides as foliar application against major sucking pests and toxicity against predators of these pests of Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“was found promising to managed the major sucking pests of Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–550 · show in text ↑
e2

“followed by flonicamid 50% WG @ 75 g a.i./ha, buprofezin 25% SC @ 250 g a.i./ha and diafenthiuron 50% WP 300 g a.i./ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSKE 5% and V. lecanii at 5 g/L were the next effective treatments against pests of Bt cotton.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
NSKE 5 % and V. lecanii @ 5 gm/lite6
Interactor
V. lecaniie6biocontrol_agent
Outcome
effective treatmentse6
Direction
effectivee6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The present experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of new molecules as well as biopesticides as foliar application against major sucking pests and toxicity against predators of these pests of Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–212 · show in text ↑
e6

“Next effective treatments were diafenthiuron 50% WP @ 300 g a.i./ha, buprofezin 25% SC @ 250 g a.i./ha, NSKE 5 % and V. lecanii @ 5 gm/lit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1099 · show in text ↑

buprofezin · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

diafenthiuron · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

flonicamid · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

flonicamid · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

insecticide · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

76 papers: 51 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.