Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Evaluate the efficacy of different insecticides against major insect pests of summer mungbean

Firoj .; AK Sharma; SB Das; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted at the Breeder seed production farm, Department of Plant Breeding, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, during the summer season (2024). The summer mungbean seeds were grown in plots of 5 m × 5 m, with row-to-row spacing of 30 cm and plant-to-plant spacing of 10 cm. Ten treatments were evaluated against, whiteflies, jassids and thrips, i.e., Spiromesifen 22.9% SC, Pyriproxyfen 10.8% EC, Emamectin benzoate 5% SG, Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC, Chlorantraniliprole 8.8% + Thiamethoxam 17.5% SC, Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC, Thiamethoxam 12.6% + Lambda cyhalothrin 9.5% ZC, Thiamethoxam 25% WG, Spinosad 45% SC and Control (Untreated) in RBD with three replications. The study revealed that the Thiamethoxam 25% WG was the most effective treatment for reducing the whitefly and jassid populations as well as the highest cost-benefit ratio was achieved. Additionally, Spinosad 45% SC was the most effective against thrips populations as well as the highest yield was observed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam 25% WG was most effective against whiteflies.

Taxon
summer mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Thiamethoxam 25% WGe0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whitefly and jassid populationse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thiamethoxam 25% WG was the most effective treatment for reducing the whitefly and jassid populations as well as the highest cost-benefit ratio was achieved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam 25% WG was most effective against jassids.

Taxon
summer mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Thiamethoxam 25% WGe0
Interactor
jasside0pest
Outcome
jassid populationse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thiamethoxam 25% WG was the most effective treatment for reducing the whitefly and jassid populations as well as the highest cost-benefit ratio was achieved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam 25% WG gave the highest cost-benefit ratio.

Taxon
summer mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Thiamethoxam 25% WGe0
Outcome
cost-benefit ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thiamethoxam 25% WG was the most effective treatment for reducing the whitefly and jassid populations as well as the highest cost-benefit ratio was achieved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45% SC was most effective against thrips.

Taxon
summer mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Spinosad 45% SCe0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
thrips populationse0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spinosad 45% SC was the most effective against thrips populations as well as the highest yield was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45% SC gave the highest yield.

Taxon
summer mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Spinosad 45% SCe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spinosad 45% SC was the most effective against thrips populations as well as the highest yield was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑

spinosad · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

spinosad · Thrips · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

thiamethoxam · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

thiamethoxam · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.