Paper · 2024 · Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology

Efficacy and Economics of New Insecticides and Botanicals for Jassid Control in Mung Bean (Vigna radiata, L. Wilczek)

Pooja Singh; Rajnish Kumar; Shailendra Kumar Mishra; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Backround: The present investigation was undertaken during the kharif 2021 season at the experimental farm of B.R.D.P.G. College, Deoria, UP to assess the efficacy of six insecticidal treatments against jassid populations and pod damage incidence. Pusa Vishal variety mung bean seeds were sown with a spacing of 30×15 cm in plots measuring 5 m in length and 3 m in width. Each block, replicated three times, had an interplot distance of 1.5 m. Aims: The study evaluated the effectiveness of new insecticide molecules and botanicals on jassid infestation and pod damage in mung beans. Six insecticidal treatments were tested for their impact on jassid populations and their economics. Study Design: Randomized Block Design (RBD) Place and Duration of Study: Experimental research field of the Department of Entomology, B R D P G College Deoria during Kharif season 2021. Results and Conclusion: Results indicated that all insecticidal treatments were significantly superior to the control. Acetamiprid 20 SP showed the highest efficacy against jassid populations, followed by betacyfluthrin + imidacloprid, imidacloprid, chlorantraniliprole, neem gold (2%), and neem oil (3%), enhancing crop yield. The highest cost-benefit ratio was recorded with Acetamiprid 20 SP (1:14.47), followed by imidacloprid 17.8 SL (1:5.36) and betacyfluthrin + imidacloprid (1:3.68). The cost of protection and yield is proportional to the benefits achieved.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All insecticidal treatments were significantly superior to the control.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
all insecticidal treatmentse0
Interactor
jasside1pest
Outcome
jassid populations and pod damage incidencee1
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all insecticidal treatments were significantly superior to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“against jassid populations and pod damage incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata, L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid 20 SP had the highest efficacy against jassid populations.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Acetamiprid 20 SPe0
Interactor
jasside0pest
Outcome
efficacy against jassid populationse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetamiprid 20 SP showed the highest efficacy against jassid populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata, L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Betacyfluthrin plus imidacloprid ranked second in efficacy against jassids.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
betacyfluthrin + imidaclopride0
Interactor
jasside1pest
Outcome
efficacy against jassid populationse1
Direction
followed bye0
Comparator
Acetamiprid 20 SPe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by betacyfluthrin + imidacloprid, imidacloprid, chlorantraniliprole, neem gold (2%), and neem oil (3%), enhancing crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1196 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acetamiprid 20 SP showed the highest efficacy against jassid populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata, L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The insecticide ranking continued with imidacloprid, chlorantraniliprole, neem gold and neem oil, with enhanced crop yield.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
enhancinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imidacloprid, chlorantraniliprole, neem gold (2%), and neem oil (3%), enhancing crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata, L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid 20 SP produced the highest cost-benefit ratio, 1:14.47.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Acetamiprid 20 SPe0
Outcome
cost-benefit ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1:14.47e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest cost-benefit ratio was recorded with Acetamiprid 20 SP (1:14.47)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata, L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 17.8 SL gave a cost-benefit ratio of 1:5.36.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
imidacloprid 17.8 SLe0
Outcome
cost-benefit ratioe1
Value
1:5.36e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imidacloprid 17.8 SL (1:5.36)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1317 · show in text ↑
e1

“cost-benefit ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata, L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Betacyfluthrin plus imidacloprid gave a cost-benefit ratio of 1:3.68.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
betacyfluthrin + imidaclopride0
Outcome
cost-benefit ratioe1
Value
1:3.68e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“betacyfluthrin + imidacloprid (1:3.68)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1360 · show in text ↑
e1

“cost-benefit ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata, L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–117 · show in text ↑

acetamiprid · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

acetamiprid · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

beta-cyfluthrin · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

beta-cyfluthrin · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

imidacloprid · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

imidacloprid · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.