Paper · 1992 · HortScience

CONTROLLED ATMOSPHERE STORAGE OF `DELICIOUS' APPLES IN HIGH CARBON DIOXIDE

S.R. Drake; T.A. Eisle; H. Waelti

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

`Delicious' apples were held in controlled atmosphere (CA) storage at various carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levels for 9 months. CO 2 levels were either 1, 3, or 5% with an additional treatment that was increased by 1% every 6 weeks to a maximum of 5%. For each treatment oxygen was 1%, and storage temperature was 1°C. Little quality difference was noted for the `Delicious' apples immediately after storage or after an 8 day ripening period. Firmness, external or internal color, titratable acidity and amount of scald showed no difference among the different storage treatments. Total carbohydrates and fructose were higher in apples stored at CO 2 levels above 1 %. Sensory panelists found no flavor difference in `Delicious' apples regardless of CO 2 storage level atmospheres. If one considers the substantial cost savings that are possible with increased CO 2 in the storage system, there is good reason to increase the CO 2 storage level in long term storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Little quality difference was noted for Delicious apples across CO2 storage levels, immediately after storage or after ripening.

Material
Deliciouse0
Treatment
carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levelse0
Outcome
quality differencee1
Qualifier
immediately after storage or after an 8 day ripening periode1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Delicious' apples were held in controlled atmosphere (CA) storage at various carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levels for 9 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Little quality difference was noted for the `Delicious' apples immediately after storage or after an 8 day ripening period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Firmness and external or internal color of Delicious apples did not differ among CO2 storage treatments.

Material
Deliciouse0
Treatment
carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levelse0
Outcome
Firmness, external or internal colore2
Comparator
different storage treatmentse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Delicious' apples were held in controlled atmosphere (CA) storage at various carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levels for 9 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e2

“Firmness, external or internal color, titratable acidity and amount of scald showed no difference among the different storage treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Titratable acidity and amount of scald of Delicious apples did not differ among CO2 storage treatments.

Material
Deliciouse0
Treatment
carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levelse0
Outcome
titratable acidity and amount of scalde2
Comparator
different storage treatmentse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Delicious' apples were held in controlled atmosphere (CA) storage at various carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levels for 9 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e2

“Firmness, external or internal color, titratable acidity and amount of scald showed no difference among the different storage treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total carbohydrates and fructose were higher in apples stored at CO2 levels above 1%.

Treatment
CO 2 levels above 1 %e3
Outcome
Total carbohydrates and fructosee3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
1 %e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Delicious' apples were held in controlled atmosphere (CA) storage at various carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levels for 9 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“Total carbohydrates and fructose were higher in apples stored at CO 2 levels above 1 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensory panelists found no flavor difference in Delicious apples across CO2 storage levels.

Material
Deliciouse0
Treatment
CO 2 storage levele4
Outcome
flavor differencee4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Delicious' apples were held in controlled atmosphere (CA) storage at various carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levels for 9 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sensory panelists found no flavor difference in `Delicious' apples regardless of CO 2 storage level atmospheres”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–774 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the CO2 storage level is recommended for long term storage of apples because of substantial cost savings.

Outcome
increase the CO 2 storage levele5
Qualifier
long term storagee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Delicious' apples were held in controlled atmosphere (CA) storage at various carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levels for 9 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e5

“there is good reason to increase the CO 2 storage level in long term storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–959 · show in text ↑

co2 · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

co2 · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

co2 · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

storage · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 36 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.