Abstract
`Delicious' apples were held in controlled atmosphere (CA) storage at various carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levels for 9 months. CO 2 levels were either 1, 3, or 5% with an additional treatment that was increased by 1% every 6 weeks to a maximum of 5%. For each treatment oxygen was 1%, and storage temperature was 1°C. Little quality difference was noted for the `Delicious' apples immediately after storage or after an 8 day ripening period. Firmness, external or internal color, titratable acidity and amount of scald showed no difference among the different storage treatments. Total carbohydrates and fructose were higher in apples stored at CO 2 levels above 1 %. Sensory panelists found no flavor difference in `Delicious' apples regardless of CO 2 storage level atmospheres. If one considers the substantial cost savings that are possible with increased CO 2 in the storage system, there is good reason to increase the CO 2 storage level in long term storage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Little quality difference was noted for Delicious apples across CO2 storage levels, immediately after storage or after ripening.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- Deliciouse0
- Treatment
- carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levelse0
- Outcome
- quality differencee1
- Qualifier
- immediately after storage or after an 8 day ripening periode1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“`Delicious' apples were held in controlled atmosphere (CA) storage at various carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levels for 9 months”
e1“Little quality difference was noted for the `Delicious' apples immediately after storage or after an 8 day ripening period”
Claim · model-written summary
Firmness and external or internal color of Delicious apples did not differ among CO2 storage treatments.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- Deliciouse0
- Treatment
- carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levelse0
- Outcome
- Firmness, external or internal colore2
- Comparator
- different storage treatmentse2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“`Delicious' apples were held in controlled atmosphere (CA) storage at various carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levels for 9 months”
e2“Firmness, external or internal color, titratable acidity and amount of scald showed no difference among the different storage treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Titratable acidity and amount of scald of Delicious apples did not differ among CO2 storage treatments.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- Deliciouse0
- Treatment
- carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levelse0
- Outcome
- titratable acidity and amount of scalde2
- Comparator
- different storage treatmentse2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“`Delicious' apples were held in controlled atmosphere (CA) storage at various carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levels for 9 months”
e2“Firmness, external or internal color, titratable acidity and amount of scald showed no difference among the different storage treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Total carbohydrates and fructose were higher in apples stored at CO2 levels above 1%.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae0 - Treatment
- CO 2 levels above 1 %e3
- Outcome
- Total carbohydrates and fructosee3
- Direction
- highere3
- Comparator
- 1 %e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“`Delicious' apples were held in controlled atmosphere (CA) storage at various carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levels for 9 months”
e3“Total carbohydrates and fructose were higher in apples stored at CO 2 levels above 1 %”
Claim · model-written summary
Sensory panelists found no flavor difference in Delicious apples across CO2 storage levels.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- Deliciouse0
- Treatment
- CO 2 storage levele4
- Outcome
- flavor differencee4
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“`Delicious' apples were held in controlled atmosphere (CA) storage at various carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levels for 9 months”
e4“Sensory panelists found no flavor difference in `Delicious' apples regardless of CO 2 storage level atmospheres”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing the CO2 storage level is recommended for long term storage of apples because of substantial cost savings.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae0 - Outcome
- increase the CO 2 storage levele5
- Qualifier
- long term storagee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“`Delicious' apples were held in controlled atmosphere (CA) storage at various carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levels for 9 months”
e5“there is good reason to increase the CO 2 storage level in long term storage”
The same questions in other papers
co2 · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →co2 · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →co2 · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →storage · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
42 papers more in this group
See all 46 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.