Paper · 2007 · HortScience

Quality of Pink Lady Apples in Relation to Maturity at Harvest, Prestorage Treatments, and Controlled Atmosphere during Storage

Elena de Castro; William V. Biasi; Elizabeth J. Mitcham

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
32
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Apple [ Malus × sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf. ‘Cripps Pink’] fruit were harvested yearly, at two or three maturity stages, from the same California orchard in 2002 through 2005. Fruit firmness, soluble solids, titratable acidity, background color, and percent blush were correlated with the starch pattern index at harvest. Fruit from each harvest were stored at 0.5 ºC in air or in a controlled atmosphere (CA) with 1.5 or 2 KPa O 2 in combination with 1, 3, and 5 KPa CO 2 . Subsets of fruit were treated with 1 μL·L −1 1-methylcyclopropane for 24 hours at 0 ºC or 2200 μL·L −1 diphenylamine (DPA) for 5 minutes. Ethylene production was measured for 30 days after harvest. Ethylene concentration in the storage atmosphere was also monitored during storage. Fruit quality was evaluated after storage plus 5 days of ripening at 20 ºC. Fruit in a CA with 1 or 3 KPa CO 2 maintained firmness and green background color, and produced less ethylene during ripening at 20 ºC than fruit stored in a CA with 5 KPa CO 2 ; however, quality of all CA-stored fruit was better than air-stored fruit. Flesh browning developed only in CA storage, appearing by 2 months and not increasing in incidence with further storage periods. 1-Methylcyclopropane conserved fruit quality in air as well as CA during 4 months of storage, and DPA-treated fruit were firmer after CA storage, but similar after air storage, compared with untreated fruit. Diphenylamine did not control a stem-end scald disorder, which increased with time in storage and affected more than 80% of the fruit after 6 months of air storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Firmness, soluble solids, acidity, background color, and blush correlated with starch pattern index at harvest.

Outcome
Fruit firmness, soluble solids, titratable aciditye0
Comparator
starch pattern indexe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit firmness, soluble solids, titratable acidity, background color, and percent blush were correlated with the starch pattern index at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CA with 1 or 3 KPa CO2 retained firmness and green background color relative to 5 KPa CO2.

Treatment
CA with 1 or 3 KPa CO 2e0
Outcome
firmness and green background colore0
Direction
maintainede0
Comparator
CA with 5 KPa CO 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit in a CA with 1 or 3 KPa CO 2 maintained firmness and green background color, and produced less ethylene during ripening at 20 ºC than fruit stored in a CA with 5 KPa CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CA with 1 or 3 KPa CO2 yielded less ethylene during ripening than 5 KPa CO2.

Treatment
CA with 1 or 3 KPa CO 2e0
Outcome
ethylenee0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
during ripening at 20 ºCe0
Comparator
CA with 5 KPa CO 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit in a CA with 1 or 3 KPa CO 2 maintained firmness and green background color, and produced less ethylene during ripening at 20 ºC than fruit stored in a CA with 5 KPa CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CA storage yielded better fruit quality than air storage.

Treatment
CA-storede0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
air-storede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of all CA-stored fruit was better than air-stored fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flesh browning appeared only under CA storage, by two months.

Outcome
Flesh browninge0
Value
2 monthse0
Setting
CA storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flesh browning developed only in CA storage, appearing by 2 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flesh browning incidence did not increase with further storage.

Outcome
incidencee0
Direction
not increasinge0
Qualifier
with further storage periodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“not increasing in incidence with further storage periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-Methylcyclopropane conserved fruit quality in air and CA for four months.

Treatment
1-Methylcyclopropanee0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
conservede0
Value
4 monthse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-Methylcyclopropane conserved fruit quality in air as well as CA during 4 months of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diphenylamine treated fruit were firmer after CA storage than untreated fruit.

Treatment
DPA-treatede0
Outcome
firmere0
Direction
firmere0
Comparator
untreated fruite0
Setting
CA storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DPA-treated fruit were firmer after CA storage, but similar after air storage, compared with untreated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diphenylamine treated and untreated fruit had similar firmness after air storage.

Treatment
DPA-treatede0
Outcome
similare0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
untreated fruite0
Setting
air storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DPA-treated fruit were firmer after CA storage, but similar after air storage, compared with untreated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diphenylamine did not control stem-end scald.

Treatment
Diphenylaminee0
Outcome
stem-end scald disordere0
Direction
did not controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diphenylamine did not control a stem-end scald disorder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem-end scald increased with storage time.

Outcome
stem-end scald disordere0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem-end scald disorder, which increased with time in storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem-end scald affected more than 80% of fruit after six months in air.

Outcome
affectede0
Value
more than 80%e0
Qualifier
after 6 months of air storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“affected more than 80% of the fruit after 6 months of air storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

co2 · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

storage · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 25 positive, 4 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

118 papers: 93 positive, 25 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

114 papers more in this group

See all 118 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.