Paper · 2016 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effects of herbicides and tillage practices on weeds and summer mungbean (Vigna radiata) in wheat (Triticum aestivum)-mungbean cropping sequence

C P NATH; T K DAS; K S RANA

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute to study the weed management strategy in zero-tillage (ZT) and conventional tillage (CT) with and without residue during 2014 and 2015 in summer mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] following residual effects of 4 weed control treatments, comprising of readymix and sequential application of herbicides during previous rabi seasons, 2013-14 and 2014-15 in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Previous season weed-control treatment significantly reduced the broad-leaved, narrow-leaved and total weed population and dry weight in both the years over unweeded control. However, herbicidal treatments did not differ significantly adopted during previous rabi season. Results showed that ZT with residue retention (ZT+R) caused a significant reduction in population and dry weight of weeds compared to CT without residue. Mungbean yield attributes were higher in ZT with residue retention (ZT+R) than conventional-tilled treatments. Previous applied of pendimethalin 1 kg/ha followed by sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha combined with ZT with 5 tonnes/ha residue retention (ZT+R) +75% N + rest N based on GreenSeekerTM (GS) resulting in higher mungbean yield, may be recommended for mungbean production in north-western Indo-Gangetic plains of India in wheat-mungbean sequence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous-season weed-control treatments reduced broad-leaved, narrow-leaved and total weed population.

Taxon
summer mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Previous season weed-control treatmente0
Outcome
broad-leaved, narrow-leaved and total weed populatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
unweeded controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Previous season weed-control treatment significantly reduced the broad-leaved, narrow-leaved and total weed population and dry weight in both the years over unweeded control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous-season weed-control treatments reduced weed dry weight.

Taxon
summer mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Previous season weed-control treatmente0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
unweeded controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Previous season weed-control treatment significantly reduced the broad-leaved, narrow-leaved and total weed population and dry weight in both the years over unweeded control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicidal treatments in the preceding season did not differ significantly.

Taxon
summer mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
herbicidal treatments did not differ significantlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicidal treatments did not differ significantly adopted during previous rabi season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with residue retention reduced weed population relative to conventional tillage without residue.

Taxon
summer mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
ZT with residue retention (ZT+R)e0
Outcome
populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
CT without residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZT with residue retention (ZT+R) caused a significant reduction in population and dry weight of weeds compared to CT without residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with residue retention reduced weed dry weight relative to conventional tillage without residue.

Taxon
summer mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
ZT with residue retention (ZT+R)e0
Outcome
dry weight of weedse0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
CT without residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZT with residue retention (ZT+R) caused a significant reduction in population and dry weight of weeds compared to CT without residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean yield attributes were higher with zero tillage and residue retention than conventional tillage.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
ZT with residue retention (ZT+R)e0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional-tilled treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mungbean yield attributes were higher in ZT with residue retention (ZT+R) than conventional-tilled treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A combined herbicide, zero-tillage, residue and nitrogen program produced higher mungbean yield.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
pendimethalin 1 kg/ha followed by sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha combined with ZT with 5 tonnes/ha residue retention (ZT+R) +75% N + rest N based on GreenSeekerTM (GS)e0
Outcome
mungbean yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pendimethalin 1 kg/ha followed by sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha combined with ZT with 5 tonnes/ha residue retention (ZT+R) +75% N + rest N based on GreenSeekerTM (GS) resulting in higher mungbean yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1214 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the combined herbicide, zero-tillage, residue and nitrogen program for mungbean production in north-western Indo-Gangetic plains.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Outcome
pendimethalin 1 kg/ha followed by sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha combined with ZT with 5 tonnes/ha residue retention (ZT+R) +75% N + rest N based on GreenSeekerTM (GS)e0
Setting
north-western Indo-Gangetic plains of Indiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pendimethalin 1 kg/ha followed by sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha combined with ZT with 5 tonnes/ha residue retention (ZT+R) +75% N + rest N based on GreenSeekerTM (GS) resulting in higher mungbean yield, may be recommended for mungbean production in north-western Indo-Gangetic plains of India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1305 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 45 positive, 1 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

climate site · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
    Warm conditions produced mean growth of 17.33 cm.

    Effect of Temperature on Mung Bean Growth Rate · 2020 · compared with room temperature environment

    Same direction

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

herbicide · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 19 positive, 9 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

organic · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

tillage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 67 positive, 14 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

tillage · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

organic · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

tillage · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.