Paper · 1994 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Crop yields and nutrient uptake by rainfed wheat and mungbean as affected by tillage, fertilization, and weeding

M. Shafiq; A. Hassan; N. Ahmad; et al.

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments were conducted on rainfed wheat and mungbean for two consecutive seasons on a Udic Ustocrept to evaluate the effect of tillage techniques, fertilization, and weeding on crop yields and nutrient uptake. Tillage techniques were conventional, zero, and deep tillage. Fertilizer treatments consisted of a control, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilizer, and farmyard manure plus fertilizer. Grain yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was 2,404 kg/ha under conventional tillage, 2,008 kg/ha under zero tillage, and 2,839 kg/ha under deep tillage. Total dry matter of wheat was 7,612 kg/ha under deep tillage, 6,671 kg/ha under conventional tillage, and 6,016 kg/ha under zero tillage. Fertilizer application increased wheat grain yield by 112% and total dry matter by 150% over the control. Weed biomass of wheat was 57% greater under zero tillage than under conventional tillage. Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) grain yield was 371 kg/ha under conventional tillage, 248 kg/ha under zero tillage, and 367 kg/ha under deep tillage. Mungbean total dry matter yield was 2,018 kg/ha under deep tillage, 1,814 kg/ha under conventional, and 1,143 kg/ha under zero tillage. Dry weed biomass in mungbean was 38% greater under zero tillage and 6% lesser under deep tillage than that of conventional tillage. Nitrogen and P uptake by weeds was greater under zero tillage compared with conventional and deep tillage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield under zero tillage (2,008 kg/ha) was lower than under conventional tillage (2,404 kg/ha).

Treatment
zero tillagee1
Outcome
Grain yielde1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
2,008 kg/hae1
Qualifier
2,404 kg/ha under conventional tillagee1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Grain yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was 2,404 kg/ha under conventional tillage, 2,008 kg/ha under zero tillage, and 2,839 kg/ha under deep tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–572 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted on rainfed wheat and mungbean for two consecutive seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield under deep tillage (2,839 kg/ha) was higher than under conventional tillage (2,404 kg/ha).

Treatment
deep tillagee1
Outcome
Grain yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
2,839 kg/hae1
Qualifier
2,404 kg/ha under conventional tillagee1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Grain yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was 2,404 kg/ha under conventional tillage, 2,008 kg/ha under zero tillage, and 2,839 kg/ha under deep tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–572 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted on rainfed wheat and mungbean for two consecutive seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat total dry matter under deep tillage (7,612 kg/ha) was higher than under conventional tillage (6,671 kg/ha).

Treatment
deep tillagee1
Outcome
Total dry mattere1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
7,612 kg/hae1
Qualifier
6,671 kg/ha under conventional tillagee1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Total dry matter of wheat was 7,612 kg/ha under deep tillage, 6,671 kg/ha under conventional tillage, and 6,016 kg/ha under zero tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–710 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted on rainfed wheat and mungbean for two consecutive seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat total dry matter under zero tillage (6,016 kg/ha) was lower than under conventional tillage (6,671 kg/ha).

Treatment
zero tillagee1
Outcome
Total dry mattere1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
6,016 kg/hae1
Qualifier
6,671 kg/ha under conventional tillagee1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Total dry matter of wheat was 7,612 kg/ha under deep tillage, 6,671 kg/ha under conventional tillage, and 6,016 kg/ha under zero tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–710 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted on rainfed wheat and mungbean for two consecutive seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer application increased wheat grain yield by 112% over the control.

Treatment
Fertilizer applicatione1
Outcome
wheat grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
112%e1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fertilizer application increased wheat grain yield by 112% and total dry matter by 150% over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–816 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted on rainfed wheat and mungbean for two consecutive seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer application increased wheat total dry matter by 150% over the control.

Treatment
Fertilizer applicatione1
Outcome
total dry mattere1
Direction
increasede1
Value
150%e1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fertilizer application increased wheat grain yield by 112% and total dry matter by 150% over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–816 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted on rainfed wheat and mungbean for two consecutive seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed biomass in wheat was 57% greater under zero tillage than under conventional tillage.

Treatment
zero tillagee1
Interactor
Weede1weed
Outcome
Weed biomasse1
Direction
greatere1
Value
57%e1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Weed biomass of wheat was 57% greater under zero tillage than under conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–906 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted on rainfed wheat and mungbean for two consecutive seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean grain yield under zero tillage (248 kg/ha) was lower than under conventional tillage (371 kg/ha).

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
zero tillagee1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
248 kg/hae1
Qualifier
371 kg/ha under conventional tillagee1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) grain yield was 371 kg/ha under conventional tillage, 248 kg/ha under zero tillage, and 367 kg/ha under deep tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1052 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted on rainfed wheat and mungbean for two consecutive seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean grain yield under deep tillage (367 kg/ha) was lower than under conventional tillage (371 kg/ha).

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
deep tillagee1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
367 kg/hae1
Qualifier
371 kg/ha under conventional tillagee1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) grain yield was 371 kg/ha under conventional tillage, 248 kg/ha under zero tillage, and 367 kg/ha under deep tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1052 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted on rainfed wheat and mungbean for two consecutive seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean total dry matter yield under deep tillage (2,018 kg/ha) was higher than under conventional tillage (1,814 kg/ha).

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
deep tillagee1
Outcome
total dry matter yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
2,018 kg/hae1
Qualifier
1,814 kg/ha under conventionale1
Comparator
conventionale1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Mungbean total dry matter yield was 2,018 kg/ha under deep tillage, 1,814 kg/ha under conventional, and 1,143 kg/ha under zero tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1188 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted on rainfed wheat and mungbean for two consecutive seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean total dry matter yield under zero tillage (1,143 kg/ha) was lower than under conventional tillage (1,814 kg/ha).

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
zero tillagee1
Outcome
total dry matter yielde1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
1,143 kg/hae1
Qualifier
1,814 kg/ha under conventionale1
Comparator
conventionale1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Mungbean total dry matter yield was 2,018 kg/ha under deep tillage, 1,814 kg/ha under conventional, and 1,143 kg/ha under zero tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1188 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted on rainfed wheat and mungbean for two consecutive seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry weed biomass in mungbean was 38% greater under zero tillage than under conventional tillage.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
zero tillagee1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
Dry weed biomasse1
Direction
greatere1
Value
38%e1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Dry weed biomass in mungbean was 38% greater under zero tillage and 6% lesser under deep tillage than that of conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1320 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted on rainfed wheat and mungbean for two consecutive seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry weed biomass in mungbean was 6% lower under deep tillage than under conventional tillage.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
deep tillagee1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
Dry weed biomasse1
Direction
lessere1
Value
6%e1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Dry weed biomass in mungbean was 38% greater under zero tillage and 6% lesser under deep tillage than that of conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1320 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted on rainfed wheat and mungbean for two consecutive seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and P uptake by weeds was greater under zero tillage than under conventional and deep tillage in wheat and mungbean.

Taxon
wheat and mungbeanTriticum aestivumVigna radiatat0
Treatment
zero tillagee1
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
Nitrogen and P uptake by weedse1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
conventional and deep tillagee1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Nitrogen and P uptake by weeds was greater under zero tillage compared with conventional and deep tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1427 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted on rainfed wheat and mungbean for two consecutive seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–99 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed wheat and mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–61 · show in text ↑

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 126 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

179 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

tillage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 67 positive, 14 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

tillage · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.