Abstract
The field investigation was carried out at College Farm, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari to study the effect of land configuration on summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.) under South Gujarat condition during the summer seasons of the year 2022 and 2023. The experiment was laid out in spilt plot design with twenty four treatment combinations comprising of three methods of land configurations viz., raised bed (L1), flat bed (L2) and ridge & furrow (L3); while four levels of irrigation viz., irrigation at 30 and 45 DAS (I1), irrigation at 30, 45, and 60 DAS (I2), irrigation at 30 and 60 DAS (I3) and irrigation at 45, and 60 DAS (I4) in main plot and two treatments of bio compost viz., without bio compost (B0) and with bio compost @ 5 t/ha application (B1) in sub plot with four replications. The soil of experimental field was clayey in texture, low in organic carbon and available N, medium in available P2O5 and high in available K2O. The soil was found slightly alkaline with normal electric conductivity. Results of the field experiments during both the years revealed that the land configuration treatments noted non-significant effect on plant population at initially (20 DAS), but at harvest raised bed sowing recorded higher plant population of green gram than flatbed sowing method. Significantly higher values were found with raised bed sowing method under different growth attributes viz., plant height at 40, 60 DAS and at harvest, number of branches per plant at harvest, number of root nodules at 40 and 60 DAS, dry matter accumulation at 40, 60 DAS and at harvest and crop growth rate during 40-60 DAS and 60 DAS-harvest over flatbed sowing method. Days to 50% flowering and days to maturity were noted significantly lower with raised bed sowing treatment over other treatments. Whereas, yield attributes and yields like, numbers of pods per plant, grain weight per plant, grain and stover yields of green gram were significantly higher in raised bed over flat bed. Significantly higher protein yield, consumptive use of water and N, P and K uptake were recorded when green gram sown on raised bed over other sowing methods. However, field water use efficiency was recorded the maximum under ridges and furrow sowing followed by raised bed sowing treatment. However, length of pod, number of grains per pod, 100 grain weight, harvest index, protein content, nutrient content, pH, EC and OC in the soil and status of available nutrients i.e., N, P and K in soil were found non-significant under different land configuration treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Land configuration did not significantly affect initial plant population.
- Taxon
- summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Organ / stage
- 20 DASe0
- Treatment
- land configuration treatmentse0
- Outcome
- plant populatione0
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“land configuration treatments noted non-significant effect on plant population at initially (20 DAS)”
t0“summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds gave higher harvest plant population than flat beds.
- Taxon
- summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
- Organ / stage
- harveste0
- Treatment
- raised bed sowinge0
- Outcome
- plant populatione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- flatbed sowing methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“at harvest raised bed sowing recorded higher plant population of green gram than flatbed sowing method”
t0“summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly increased plant height at 40 and 60 DAS and harvest relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
- Organ / stage
- 40, 60 DAS and at harveste0
- Treatment
- raised bed sowing methode0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- flatbed sowing methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly higher values were found with raised bed sowing method under different growth attributes viz., plant height at 40, 60 DAS and at harvest, number of branches per plant at harvest, number of root nodules at 40 and 60 DAS, dry matter accumulation at 40, 60 DAS and at harvest and crop growth rate during 40-60 DAS and 60 DAS-harvest over flatbed sowing method”
t0“summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly increased branches and root nodules relative to flat beds.
- Taxon
- summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- raised bed sowing methode0
- Outcome
- number of branches per plant at harvest, number of root nodules at 40 and 60 DASe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- flatbed sowing methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly higher values were found with raised bed sowing method under different growth attributes viz., plant height at 40, 60 DAS and at harvest, number of branches per plant at harvest, number of root nodules at 40 and 60 DAS, dry matter accumulation at 40, 60 DAS and at harvest and crop growth rate during 40-60 DAS and 60 DAS-harvest over flatbed sowing method”
t0“summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly increased dry matter accumulation and crop growth rate over flat beds.
- Taxon
- summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- raised bed sowing methode0
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulation at 40, 60 DAS and at harvest and crop growth rate during 40-60 DAS and 60 DAS-harveste0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- flatbed sowing methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly higher values were found with raised bed sowing method under different growth attributes viz., plant height at 40, 60 DAS and at harvest, number of branches per plant at harvest, number of root nodules at 40 and 60 DAS, dry matter accumulation at 40, 60 DAS and at harvest and crop growth rate during 40-60 DAS and 60 DAS-harvest over flatbed sowing method”
t0“summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly shortened time to flowering and maturity compared with other treatments.
- Taxon
- summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- raised bed sowing treatmente0
- Outcome
- Days to 50% flowering and days to maturitye0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Days to 50% flowering and days to maturity were noted significantly lower with raised bed sowing treatment over other treatments”
t0“summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly increased pods per plant and grain weight per plant over flat beds.
- Taxon
- summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- raised bede0
- Outcome
- numbers of pods per plant, grain weight per plante0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- flat bede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“numbers of pods per plant, grain weight per plant, grain and stover yields of green gram were significantly higher in raised bed over flat bed”
t0“summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly increased grain and stover yields over flat beds.
- Taxon
- summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- raised bede0
- Outcome
- grain and stover yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- flat bede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grain and stover yields of green gram were significantly higher in raised bed over flat bed”
t0“summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly increased protein yield and consumptive water use over other sowing methods.
- Taxon
- summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- raised bede0
- Outcome
- protein yield, consumptive use of watere0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other sowing methodse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly higher protein yield, consumptive use of water and N, P and K uptake were recorded when green gram sown on raised bed over other sowing methods”
t0“summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly increased N, P and K uptake over other sowing methods.
- Taxon
- summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- raised bede0
- Outcome
- N, P and K uptakee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other sowing methodse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly higher protein yield, consumptive use of water and N, P and K uptake were recorded when green gram sown on raised bed over other sowing methods”
t0“summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Ridge and furrow sowing maximized field water use efficiency, followed by raised beds.
- Taxon
- summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- ridges and furrow sowinge0
- Outcome
- field water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- raised bed sowing treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“field water use efficiency was recorded the maximum under ridges and furrow sowing followed by raised bed sowing treatment”
t0“summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Land configuration did not significantly change pod length, grains per pod, 100 grain weight or harvest index.
- Taxon
- summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- different land configuration treatmentse0
- Outcome
- length of pod, number of grains per pod, 100 grain weighte0
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“length of pod, number of grains per pod, 100 grain weight, harvest index, protein content, nutrient content, pH, EC and OC in the soil and status of available nutrients i.e., N, P and K in soil were found non-significant under different land configuration treatments”
t0“summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Land configuration did not significantly change protein or nutrient content.
- Taxon
- summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- different land configuration treatmentse0
- Outcome
- protein content, nutrient contente0
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“protein content, nutrient content, pH, EC and OC in the soil and status of available nutrients i.e., N, P and K in soil were found non-significant under different land configuration treatments”
t0“summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Land configuration did not significantly change soil pH, EC, OC or available N, P and K.
- Taxon
- summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- different land configuration treatmentse0
- Outcome
- pH, EC and OC in the soile0
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pH, EC and OC in the soil and status of available nutrients i.e., N, P and K in soil were found non-significant under different land configuration treatments”
t0“summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · phenology · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
tillage · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →tillage · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →tillage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →tillage · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
tillage · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
tillage · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.