Abstract
Field studies were conducted in 1992 and 1993 to evaluate the efficacy of EPTC plus R-29148 (EPTC + ) plus cyanazine and alachlor plus cyanazine. Materials were applied PPI and PRE to corn at 25, 50, 75, and 100% of labeled rates in an aqueous solution (sprays) and as herbicide-impregnated fertilizer. EPTC + plus cyanazine at all rates applied as sprays or as herbicide-impregnated fertilizer controlled 89% or more of giant foxtail. Velvetleaf and common lambsquarters control was less when alachlor plus cyanazine was applied as herbicide-impregnated fertilizer than when applied as sprays. When sprayed, alachlor plus cyanazine applied PPI controlled 95% giant foxtail only at the 100% rate without cultivation, but at all rates with cultivation. Alachlor plus cyanazine applied as impregnated fertilizer at 50, 75, and 100% labeled rates controlled 88% or more of giant foxtail when these treatments received a interrow cultivation. PRE treatments of alachlor plus cyanazine applied as herbicide-impregnated fertilizer were less effective in 1992 than in 1993 because of lack of timely precipitation following application.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
EPTC plus cyanazine controlled at least 89% of giant foxtail across rates and application modes.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0 - Treatment
- EPTC + plus cyanazine at all rates applied as sprays or as herbicide-impregnated fertilizere0
- Interactor
- giant foxtaile0weed
- Outcome
- giant foxtaile0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- 89% or moree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“EPTC + plus cyanazine at all rates applied as sprays or as herbicide-impregnated fertilizer controlled 89% or more of giant foxtail.”
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer impregnation gave less velvetleaf and lambsquarters control than spraying.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- alachlor plus cyanazine was applied as herbicide-impregnated fertilizere0
- Interactor
- Velvetleaf
Abutilon theophrastie0weed - Second interactor
- common lambsquarters
Chenopodium albume0weed - Outcome
- Velvetleaf and common lambsquarters controle0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- applied as sprayse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Velvetleaf and common lambsquarters control was less when alachlor plus cyanazine was applied as herbicide-impregnated fertilizer than when applied as sprays.”
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sprayed PPI alachlor plus cyanazine controlled 95% of giant foxtail only at full rate without cultivation.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- alachlor plus cyanazine applied PPIe0
- Interactor
- giant foxtaile0weed
- Outcome
- giant foxtaile0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- 95%e0
- Qualifier
- only at the 100% rate without cultivatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When sprayed, alachlor plus cyanazine applied PPI controlled 95% giant foxtail only at the 100% rate without cultivation, but at all rates with cultivation.”
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
Claim · model-written summary
With cultivation, sprayed PPI alachlor plus cyanazine controlled 95% of giant foxtail at all rates.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- alachlor plus cyanazine applied PPIe0
- Interactor
- giant foxtaile0weed
- Outcome
- giant foxtaile0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- 95%e0
- Qualifier
- at all rates with cultivatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When sprayed, alachlor plus cyanazine applied PPI controlled 95% giant foxtail only at the 100% rate without cultivation, but at all rates with cultivation.”
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
Claim · model-written summary
Impregnated fertilizer at 50 to 100% rates with interrow cultivation controlled at least 88% of giant foxtail.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- Alachlor plus cyanazine applied as impregnated fertilizer at 50, 75, and 100% labeled ratese0
- Interactor
- giant foxtaile0weed
- Outcome
- giant foxtaile0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- 88% or moree0
- Qualifier
- interrow cultivatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Alachlor plus cyanazine applied as impregnated fertilizer at 50, 75, and 100% labeled rates controlled 88% or more of giant foxtail when these treatments received a interrow cultivation.”
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
Claim · model-written summary
PRE fertilizer-impregnated alachlor plus cyanazine was less effective in 1992 than 1993, attributed to delayed precipitation.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- PRE treatments of alachlor plus cyanazine applied as herbicide-impregnated fertilizere0
- Outcome
- less effectivee0
- Direction
- less effectivee0
- Qualifier
- lack of timely precipitation following applicatione0
- Comparator
- 1993e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PRE treatments of alachlor plus cyanazine applied as herbicide-impregnated fertilizer were less effective in 1992 than in 1993 because of lack of timely precipitation following application.”
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
The same questions in other papers
EPTC · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
alachlor · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
cyanazine · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
158 papers more in this group
See all 162 papers →herbicide · Abutilon theophrasti · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →application · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →herbicide · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →fertilization · Abutilon theophrasti · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.