Paper · 2004 · Weed Science

Impacts of composted swine manure on weed and corn nutrient uptake, growth, and seed production

Matt Liebman; Fabián D. Menalled; Douglas D. Buhler; et al.

13
claims
23
verbatim quotes
49
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Hoop structures bedded with crop residues are becoming increasingly popular for swine production in the northcentral United States. Compost made from bedding materials and swine manure can be used as a soil amendment. A 3-yr field experiment was conducted in Boone, IA, to determine how composted swine manure affected selected soil characteristics and nutrient uptake, growth, and seed production of corn and three weed species (giant foxtail, velvetleaf, and common waterhemp) grown in mixture with corn. Two soil management systems, designed to provide equivalent amounts of N to corn, were compared: one that received composted manure and an average of 118 kg N ha−1 as synthetic fertilizer and another that received no composted manure and an average of 143 kg N ha−1 as synthetic fertilizer. Soil organic matter, P, K, and early-season NO3-N levels were greater in the (+) compost system. The N concentration of velvetleaf shoots, the P concentration of giant foxtail and common waterhemp shoots, and the K concentration of shoots of all three weed species also were greater in the (+) compost system. Compost application consistently increased common waterhemp height, common waterhemp biomass, and velvetleaf height, but increased velvetleaf biomass in only 1 yr and had no effect on giant foxtail height or biomass. Measurements of weed seed production, conducted in the final year of the study, showed that compost increased velvetleaf and common waterhemp seed production but had no effect on giant foxtail seed production. Compost consistently increased corn height and leaf K concentration but generally had no effect on corn yield. Results of this study indicate that large differences can exist among crop and weed species in their response to soil amendments. Depending on the weed species present, use of composted swine manure may increase requirements for weed management in corn production systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased soil organic matter, P, K and early season nitrate.

Treatment
(+) compost systeme0
Outcome
Soil organic matter, P, K, and early-season NO3-N levelse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil organic matter, P, K, and early-season NO3-N levels were greater in the (+) compost system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed and corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased velvetleaf shoot N concentration.

Treatment
(+) compost systeme0
Interactor
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0weed
Outcome
N concentration of velvetleaf shootse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · InteractorI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N concentration of velvetleaf shoots, the P concentration of giant foxtail and common waterhemp shoots, and the K concentration of shoots of all three weed species also were greater in the (+) compost system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed and corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased giant foxtail and common waterhemp shoot P concentration.

Treatment
(+) compost systeme0
Interactor
giant foxtaile0weed
Second interactor
common waterhempe0weed
Outcome
P concentration of giant foxtail and common waterhemp shootse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N concentration of velvetleaf shoots, the P concentration of giant foxtail and common waterhemp shoots, and the K concentration of shoots of all three weed species also were greater in the (+) compost system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed and corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased shoot K concentration in all three weeds.

Treatment
(+) compost systeme0
Outcome
K concentration of shoots of all three weed speciese0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N concentration of velvetleaf shoots, the P concentration of giant foxtail and common waterhemp shoots, and the K concentration of shoots of all three weed species also were greater in the (+) compost system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed and corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased common waterhemp height and biomass.

Treatment
Compost applicatione0
Interactor
common waterhempe0weed
Outcome
common waterhemp height, common waterhemp biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost application consistently increased common waterhemp height, common waterhemp biomass, and velvetleaf height, but increased velvetleaf biomass in only 1 yr and had no effect on giant foxtail height or biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed and corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased velvetleaf height consistently and biomass in one year.

Treatment
Compost applicatione0
Interactor
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0weed
Outcome
velvetleaf heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · InteractorI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost application consistently increased common waterhemp height, common waterhemp biomass, and velvetleaf height, but increased velvetleaf biomass in only 1 yr and had no effect on giant foxtail height or biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed and corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased velvetleaf biomass in one year.

Interactor
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0weed
Outcome
velvetleaf biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
only 1 yre0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · InteractorI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased velvetleaf biomass in only 1 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed and corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost had no effect on giant foxtail height or biomass.

Interactor
giant foxtaile0weed
Outcome
giant foxtail height or biomasse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had no effect on giant foxtail height or biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed and corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased velvetleaf and common waterhemp seed production.

Treatment
composte0
Interactor
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0weed
Second interactor
common waterhempe0weed
Outcome
velvetleaf and common waterhemp seed productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · InteractorI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compost increased velvetleaf and common waterhemp seed production but had no effect on giant foxtail seed production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed and corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost had no effect on giant foxtail seed production.

Treatment
composte0
Interactor
giant foxtaile0weed
Outcome
giant foxtail seed productione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compost increased velvetleaf and common waterhemp seed production but had no effect on giant foxtail seed production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed and corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased corn height and leaf K concentration.

Treatment
Composte0
Outcome
corn height and leaf K concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost consistently increased corn height and leaf K concentration but generally had no effect on corn yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost generally had no effect on corn yield.

Treatment
Composte0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost consistently increased corn height and leaf K concentration but generally had no effect on corn yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1645 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest compost use may increase weed management needs depending on weed species.

Outcome
requirements for weed managemente0
Qualifier
Depending on the weed species presente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Depending on the weed species present, use of composted swine manure may increase requirements for weed management in corn production systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1776–1918 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

339 papers: 303 positive, 36 negative or no effect

302 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

335 papers more in this group

See all 339 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

422 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,485 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

fertilization · Abutilon theophrasti · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.