Paper · 1986 · Pesticide Science

Physiological interactions between the herbicide EPTC and selected analogues of the antidote naphthalic anhydride on two hybrids of maize

Kriton K. Hatzios; Paul Zama

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The efficacies of nine structural analogues of the herbicide antidote naphthalene‐1,8‐dicarboxylic acid anhydride (naphthalic anhydride, NA) for the protection of maize ( Zea mays L. cv. DeKalb XL72AA and DeKalb XL67) against injury by the herbicide S ‐ethyl dipropyl(thiocarbamate) (EPTC) were elevated under greenhouse conditions. The chemical analogues of NA tested were: acenaphthenequinone (ACQ); 4‐aminonaphthalene‐1,8‐dicarboxylic acid anhydride (NH 2 NA); 1,8:4,5‐naphthalenetetracarboxylic acid dianhydride (NDiA); naphthalene‐ 1,8‐carboximide (NHNA); 4‐chloronaphthalene‐1,8‐dicarboxylic acid anhydride (C1NA); biphenyl‐2,2′‐dicarboxylic acid anhydride (diphenic anhydride; DA); 2‐phenylglutaric anhydride (PGA); phthalic anhydride (PHA); phenalen‐1‐one (PA). Pre‐plant incorporated applications of EPTC at 2.2, 4.5, 6.7, and 9.0 kg ha −1 were highly toxic to XL67 maize. Appreciable injury to XL72AA maize by EPTC was observed only with the high rates of EPTC (6.7 and 9.0 kg ha −1 ). Of the analogues tested PGA and PA were very toxic and inhibited germination of both maize hybrids. NA, ACQ, NH 2 NA, NDiA, NHNA, C1NA, DA, and PHA applied as seed dressings at 5.0 and 10 g per kg of seed offered satisfactory protection to XL72AA maize against EPTC rates higher than 6.7 kg ha −1 . The same antidotes significantly antagonised the EPTC activity against XL67 maize but the overall protection obtained was partial and not agronomically important. The presence of the dicarboxylic anhydride group and of at least one aromatic ring attached directly to the anhydride appeared to be essential for the exhibition of protective activity by the structural analogues of NA. NA was slightly toxic to both hybrids of maize and chlorination of NA increased the phytotoxicity of this molecule. A genetic component that is present in the thiocarbamate‐tolerant XL72AA hybrid but absent from the thiocarbamate‐susceptible XL67 hybrid of maize appeared to be important for the phytotoxic activity of EPTC and may be involved in the protective activity of NA and its structural analogues.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EPTC applied at 2.2 to 9.0 kg ha −1 was highly toxic to XL67 maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
XL67e1
Treatment
applications of EPTC at 2.2, 4.5, 6.7, and 9.0 kg ha −1e1
Outcome
toxic to XL67 maizee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two hybrids of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“applications of EPTC at 2.2, 4.5, 6.7, and 9.0 kg ha −1 were highly toxic to XL67 maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High rates of EPTC (6.7 and 9.0 kg ha −1) caused appreciable injury to XL72AA maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
XL72AAe2
Treatment
high rates of EPTCe2
Outcome
Appreciable injury to XL72AA maizee2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two hybrids of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–137 · show in text ↑
e2

“Appreciable injury to XL72AA maize by EPTC was observed only with the high rates of EPTC (6.7 and 9.0 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1003 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGA and PA were very toxic and inhibited germination of both maize hybrids.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse3
Treatment
PGA and PAe3
Outcome
germinatione3
Direction
inhibitede3
Qualifier
very toxice3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two hybrids of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–137 · show in text ↑
e3

“Of the analogues tested PGA and PA were very toxic and inhibited germination of both maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed dressings of NA, ACQ and NH2NA gave satisfactory protection to XL72AA maize against EPTC.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Material
XL72AAe4
Treatment
NA, ACQ, NH 2 NAe4
Outcome
satisfactory protection to XL72AA maize against EPTCe4
Qualifier
seed dressings at 5.0 and 10 g per kg of seede4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two hybrids of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–137 · show in text ↑
e4

“NA, ACQ, NH 2 NA, NDiA, NHNA, C1NA, DA, and PHA applied as seed dressings at 5.0 and 10 g per kg of seed offered satisfactory protection to XL72AA maize against EPTC rates higher than 6.7 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed dressings of NDiA, NHNA and C1NA gave satisfactory protection to XL72AA maize against EPTC.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Material
XL72AAe4
Treatment
NDiA, NHNA, C1NAe4
Outcome
satisfactory protection to XL72AA maize against EPTCe4
Qualifier
seed dressings at 5.0 and 10 g per kg of seede4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two hybrids of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–137 · show in text ↑
e4

“NA, ACQ, NH 2 NA, NDiA, NHNA, C1NA, DA, and PHA applied as seed dressings at 5.0 and 10 g per kg of seed offered satisfactory protection to XL72AA maize against EPTC rates higher than 6.7 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed dressings of DA and PHA gave satisfactory protection to XL72AA maize against EPTC.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Material
XL72AAe4
Treatment
DA, and PHAe4
Outcome
satisfactory protection to XL72AA maize against EPTCe4
Qualifier
seed dressings at 5.0 and 10 g per kg of seede4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two hybrids of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–137 · show in text ↑
e4

“NA, ACQ, NH 2 NA, NDiA, NHNA, C1NA, DA, and PHA applied as seed dressings at 5.0 and 10 g per kg of seed offered satisfactory protection to XL72AA maize against EPTC rates higher than 6.7 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same antidotes significantly antagonised EPTC activity against XL67 maize, but the overall protection was partial and not agronomically important.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse5
Material
XL67e5
Treatment
The same antidotese5
Outcome
EPTC activitye5
Direction
antagonisede5
Qualifier
overall protection obtained was partial and not agronomically importante5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two hybrids of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–137 · show in text ↑
e5

“The same antidotes significantly antagonised the EPTC activity against XL67 maize but the overall protection obtained was partial and not agronomically important”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1465 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A dicarboxylic anhydride group and at least one aromatic ring attached to the anhydride appear essential for the protective activity of NA analogues in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
The presence of the dicarboxylic anhydride group and of at least one aromatic ring attached directly to the anhydridee6
Outcome
protective activitye6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two hybrids of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–137 · show in text ↑
e6

“The presence of the dicarboxylic anhydride group and of at least one aromatic ring attached directly to the anhydride appeared to be essential for the exhibition of protective activity by the structural analogues of NA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1685 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NA was slightly toxic to both maize hybrids.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse7
Treatment
NAe7
Outcome
slightly toxic to both hybridse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“NA was slightly toxic to both hybrids of maize and chlorination of NA increased the phytotoxicity of this molecule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–1801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorination of NA increased phytotoxicity in maize compared with NA.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse7
Treatment
chlorination of NAe7
Outcome
phytotoxicitye7
Direction
increasede7
Comparator
NAe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two hybrids of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–137 · show in text ↑
e7

“NA was slightly toxic to both hybrids of maize and chlorination of NA increased the phytotoxicity of this molecule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–1801 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A genetic component present in the XL72AA maize hybrid but absent from XL67 may be involved in EPTC phytotoxicity and the protective activity of NA analogues.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
XL72AAe1
Outcome
phytotoxic activity of EPTCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two hybrids of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“A genetic component that is present in the thiocarbamate‐tolerant XL72AA hybrid but absent from the thiocarbamate‐susceptible XL67 hybrid of maize appeared to be important for the phytotoxic activity of EPTC and may be involved in the protective activity of NA and its structural analogues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1803–2092 · show in text ↑

EPTC · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

EPTC · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.