Abstract
In this study, apples were stored under the conditions of relative humidity of 95% and 8℃, to investigate the effect of chitosan(1.5%), oil processing(0.25%) and chitosan(1.5%) + oil processing(0.25%) on the apple weight loss rate,titratable acid, polyphenol oxidase(PPO), total phenols, cell membrane permeability and the quality of sensory. Results indicated that, three treatments had inhibitory effect on apple. Especially, 1.5% chitosan + 0.25% essential oil treatment had the best effect. After 150 days storage, the color and texture of apples were all normal, and there were no rotten fruits.What's more, weight loss rate reached a value of 8%, titratable acid was 0.25%, the PPO was 13%, the total phenol was26% and membrane permeability was 35%, which are all better than the control group, 1.5% chitosan treated group and0.25% essential oil treated group.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Chitosan, oil processing and their combination had an inhibitory effect on apple storage quality.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- chitosan(1.5%), oil processing(0.25%)e0
- Outcome
- inhibitory effecte1
- Direction
- inhibitorye1
- Setting
- relative humidity of 95% and 8℃e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Preservation”
e0“apples were stored under the conditions of relative humidity of 95% and 8℃, to investigate the effect of chitosan(1.5%), oil processing(0.25%) and chitosan(1.5%) + oil processing(0.25%)”
e1“Results indicated that, three treatments had inhibitory effect on apple”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1.5% chitosan plus 0.25% essential oil treatment had the best effect on apple.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- 1.5% chitosan + 0.25% essential oil treatmente2
- Outcome
- best effecte2
- Direction
- beste2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Preservation”
e2“Especially, 1.5% chitosan + 0.25% essential oil treatment had the best effect”
Claim · model-written summary
After 150 days of storage, apple color and texture were normal.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Outcome
- color and texture of applese3
- Qualifier
- After 150 days storagee3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Preservation”
e3“After 150 days storage, the color and texture of apples were all normal, and there were no rotten fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
After 150 days of storage, no apples were rotten.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Outcome
- rotten fruitse3
- Qualifier
- no rotten fruitse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Preservation”
e3“After 150 days storage, the color and texture of apples were all normal, and there were no rotten fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1.5% chitosan plus 0.25% essential oil treatment gave an 8% weight loss rate, better than controls.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- 1.5% chitosan + 0.25% essential oil treatmente2
- Outcome
- weight loss ratee4
- Direction
- bettere4
- Value
- 8%e4
- Comparator
- control groupe4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Preservation”
e2“Especially, 1.5% chitosan + 0.25% essential oil treatment had the best effect”
e4“What's more, weight loss rate reached a value of 8%, titratable acid was 0.25%, the PPO was 13%, the total phenol was26% and membrane permeability was 35%, which are all better than the control group, 1.5% chitosan treated group and0.25% essential oil treated group”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1.5% chitosan plus 0.25% essential oil treatment gave 0.25% titratable acid, better than controls.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- 1.5% chitosan + 0.25% essential oil treatmente2
- Outcome
- titratable acide4
- Direction
- bettere4
- Value
- 0.25%e4
- Comparator
- control groupe4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Preservation”
e2“Especially, 1.5% chitosan + 0.25% essential oil treatment had the best effect”
e4“What's more, weight loss rate reached a value of 8%, titratable acid was 0.25%, the PPO was 13%, the total phenol was26% and membrane permeability was 35%, which are all better than the control group, 1.5% chitosan treated group and0.25% essential oil treated group”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1.5% chitosan plus 0.25% essential oil treatment gave 13% PPO, better than controls.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- 1.5% chitosan + 0.25% essential oil treatmente2
- Outcome
- PPOe4
- Direction
- bettere4
- Value
- 13%e4
- Comparator
- control groupe4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Preservation”
e2“Especially, 1.5% chitosan + 0.25% essential oil treatment had the best effect”
e4“What's more, weight loss rate reached a value of 8%, titratable acid was 0.25%, the PPO was 13%, the total phenol was26% and membrane permeability was 35%, which are all better than the control group, 1.5% chitosan treated group and0.25% essential oil treated group”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1.5% chitosan plus 0.25% essential oil treatment gave 26% total phenol, better than controls.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- 1.5% chitosan + 0.25% essential oil treatmente2
- Outcome
- total phenole4
- Direction
- bettere4
- Value
- 26%e4
- Comparator
- control groupe4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Preservation”
e2“Especially, 1.5% chitosan + 0.25% essential oil treatment had the best effect”
e4“What's more, weight loss rate reached a value of 8%, titratable acid was 0.25%, the PPO was 13%, the total phenol was26% and membrane permeability was 35%, which are all better than the control group, 1.5% chitosan treated group and0.25% essential oil treated group”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1.5% chitosan plus 0.25% essential oil treatment gave 35% membrane permeability, better than controls.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- 1.5% chitosan + 0.25% essential oil treatmente2
- Outcome
- membrane permeabilitye4
- Direction
- bettere4
- Value
- 35%e4
- Comparator
- control groupe4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Preservation”
e2“Especially, 1.5% chitosan + 0.25% essential oil treatment had the best effect”
e4“What's more, weight loss rate reached a value of 8%, titratable acid was 0.25%, the PPO was 13%, the total phenol was26% and membrane permeability was 35%, which are all better than the control group, 1.5% chitosan treated group and0.25% essential oil treated group”
The same questions in other papers
chitosan · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →chitosan · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
chitosan · physiology: oxidative · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
chitosan · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →botanical · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →botanical · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →botanical · physiology: oxidative · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →botanical · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.