Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Post-harvest chitosan treatment suppresses oxidative stress by regulating reactive oxygen species metabolism in wounded apples

Sabina Ackah; Yang Bi; Sulin Xue; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
49
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Mechanical wound on fruit triggers the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that weaken cell walls, resulting in post-harvest losses. This mechanism can be controlled by using fruit preservatives to stimulate fruit antioxidant enzyme activities for the detoxification of ROS. Chitosan is a safe and environmentally friendly preservative that modulates ROS in whole fruits and plant cells, but the effects of chitosan on the ROS metabolism of mechanically wounded apples during storage are unknown. Our study focused on exploring the effects of post-harvest chitosan treatment on ROS production, cell membrane integrity, and enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems at fruit wounds during storage. Apple fruits (cv. Fuji) were artificially wounded, treated with 2.5% (w/v) chitosan, and stored at room temperature (21-25°C, RH = 81-85%) for 7 days. Non-wounded apples were used as healthy controls. The results showed that chitosan treatment stimulated the activities of NADPH oxidase and superoxide dismutase and increased the formation of superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide in fruit wounds. However, malondialdehyde, lipoxygenase, and membrane permeability, which are direct biomarkers to evaluate lipid peroxidation and membrane integrity, were significantly decreased in the wounded fruits after chitosan treatment compared to the wounded control fruits. Antioxidant enzymes, such as peroxidase and catalase activities, were induced by chitosan at fruit wounds. In addition, ascorbate-glutathione cycle-related enzymes; ascorbate peroxide, monodehydroascorbate reductase, dehydroascorbate reductase, and glutathione reductase and the content of substrates, mainly ascorbic acid, dehydroascorbate, reduced glutathione, and glutathione, were increased at fruit wounds by chitosan compared to the wounded control fruits. Our results show that wounding stimulated the production of ROS or oxidative stress. However, treatment with chitosan triggered antioxidant systems to scavenge ROS and prevent loss of fruit membrane integrity. Therefore, chitosan promises to be a favorable preservative in inducing tolerance to stress and maintaining fruit quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan stimulated NADPH oxidase and superoxide dismutase activities in wounded apples.

Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
activities of NADPH oxidase and superoxide dismutasee0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chitosan treatment stimulated the activities of NADPH oxidase and superoxide dismutase and increased the formation of superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide in fruit wounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan increased superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide formation at apple wounds.

Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
formation of superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxidee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chitosan treatment stimulated the activities of NADPH oxidase and superoxide dismutase and increased the formation of superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide in fruit wounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan significantly decreased malondialdehyde, lipoxygenase and membrane permeability in wounded fruit.

Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
malondialdehyde, lipoxygenase, and membrane permeabilitye0
Direction
significantly decreasede0
Comparator
wounded control fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“malondialdehyde, lipoxygenase, and membrane permeability, which are direct biomarkers to evaluate lipid peroxidation and membrane integrity, were significantly decreased in the wounded fruits after chitosan treatment compared to the wounded control fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan induced peroxidase and catalase activities at apple wounds.

Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
peroxidase and catalase activitiese0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peroxidase and catalase activities, were induced by chitosan at fruit wounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan increased ascorbate-glutathione cycle enzyme activities at apple wounds.

Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
ascorbate peroxide, monodehydroascorbate reductase, dehydroascorbate reductase, and glutathione reductasee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
wounded control fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ascorbate peroxide, monodehydroascorbate reductase, dehydroascorbate reductase, and glutathione reductase and the content of substrates, mainly ascorbic acid, dehydroascorbate, reduced glutathione, and glutathione, were increased at fruit wounds by chitosan compared to the wounded control fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1837 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan increased antioxidant substrate content at apple wounds.

Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
content of substrates, mainly ascorbic acid, dehydroascorbate, reduced glutathione, and glutathionee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
wounded control fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the content of substrates, mainly ascorbic acid, dehydroascorbate, reduced glutathione, and glutathione, were increased at fruit wounds by chitosan compared to the wounded control fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1837 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wounding stimulated reactive oxygen species production in apples.

Treatment
woundinge0
Outcome
production of ROS or oxidative stresse0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wounding stimulated the production of ROS or oxidative stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1861–1922 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose chitosan as a preservative to maintain apple fruit quality.

Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
maintaining fruit qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chitosan promises to be a favorable preservative in inducing tolerance to stress and maintaining fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2060–2170 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑

chitosan · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chitosan · physiology: oxidative · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chitosan · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.