Paper · 2009 · PubMed

[Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal effects on wheat growth in response to elevated tropospheric O3 concentration].

Jun-Li Hu; Xian-Gui Lin; Jun-Hua Wang; et al.

15
claims
23
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A FACE (Free-air component enrichment) system in a rice/wheat rotation field was used to investigate the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) inoculation on wheat growth and soil microbial biomass under elevated tropospheric O3 concentration. The elevated O3 concentration tended to increase AM colonization of wheat seedling and bate plant growth during the booting period, then significantly (p < 0.05) reduced aerial biomass, individual yield and kernel weight by 22%, 29% and 9%, respectively, and decreased soil microbial biomass N by 37% after wheat harvesting. However, the total N content in wheat grain significantly (p < 0.05) increased from 2.2% to 2.6%. Under elevated O3 concentration, AMF inoculation accelerated AM colonization successfully, and improved colonization rate and aerial biomass significantly (p < 0.05) during the booting period, thus reduced the damage of aerial biomass by 50% when harvesting, and increased soil microbial biomass N significantly (p < 0.05) related to the noninoculated treatment. Although wheat yield didn't increase, the total N content in grain decreased to the same level of that of the control wheat. It suggested that higher AM colonization is the resistance behavior of wheat in response to O3 intimidation, and AMF inoculation can accelerate wheat growth, increase root exudates and soil microbial biomass subsequencely.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated ozone tended to increase mycorrhizal colonization of wheat seedlings.

Organ / stage
seedlinge0
Treatment
elevated O3 concentratione0
Outcome
AM colonizatione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The elevated O3 concentration tended to increase AM colonization of wheat seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated ozone impeded wheat growth during booting.

Organ / stage
booting periode0
Outcome
plant growthe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bate plant growth during the booting period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–383 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated ozone reduced wheat aerial biomass by 22%.

Treatment
elevated O3 concentratione0
Outcome
aerial biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The elevated O3 concentration tended to increase AM colonization of wheat seedling and bate plant growth during the booting period, then significantly (p < 0.05) reduced aerial biomass, individual yield and kernel weight by 22%, 29% and 9%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated ozone reduced individual wheat yield by 29%.

Treatment
elevated O3 concentratione0
Outcome
individual yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The elevated O3 concentration tended to increase AM colonization of wheat seedling and bate plant growth during the booting period, then significantly (p < 0.05) reduced aerial biomass, individual yield and kernel weight by 22%, 29% and 9%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated ozone reduced wheat kernel weight by 9%.

Treatment
elevated O3 concentratione0
Outcome
kernel weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The elevated O3 concentration tended to increase AM colonization of wheat seedling and bate plant growth during the booting period, then significantly (p < 0.05) reduced aerial biomass, individual yield and kernel weight by 22%, 29% and 9%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated ozone decreased soil microbial biomass nitrogen by 37% after wheat harvest.

Outcome
soil microbial biomass Ne0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
37%e0
Qualifier
after wheat harvestinge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased soil microbial biomass N by 37% after wheat harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–576 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated ozone increased wheat grain nitrogen content from 2.2% to 2.6%.

Outcome
total N content in wheat graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.2% to 2.6%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total N content in wheat grain significantly (p < 0.05) increased from 2.2% to 2.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation accelerated wheat mycorrhizal colonization under elevated ozone.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
AM colonizatione0
Direction
acceleratede0
Qualifier
Under elevated O3 concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under elevated O3 concentration, AMF inoculation accelerated AM colonization successfully”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation improved colonization rate and aerial biomass during booting.

Organ / stage
booting periode0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
colonization rate and aerial biomasse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under elevated O3 concentration, AMF inoculation accelerated AM colonization successfully, and improved colonization rate and aerial biomass significantly (p < 0.05) during the booting period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation reduced harvest aerial biomass damage by 50%.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
damage of aerial biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under elevated O3 concentration, AMF inoculation accelerated AM colonization successfully, and improved colonization rate and aerial biomass significantly (p < 0.05) during the booting period, thus reduced the damage of aerial biomass by 50% when harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased soil microbial biomass nitrogen relative to no inoculation.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
soil microbial biomass Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
noninoculated treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under elevated O3 concentration, AMF inoculation accelerated AM colonization successfully, and improved colonization rate and aerial biomass significantly (p < 0.05) during the booting period, thus reduced the damage of aerial biomass by 50% when harvesting, and increased soil microbial biomass N significantly (p < 0.05) related to the noninoculated treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation did not increase wheat yield under elevated ozone.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
didn't increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although wheat yield didn't increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1075 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF inoculation accelerated AM colonization successfully”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation decreased wheat grain nitrogen content to the control level.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
total N content in graine0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total N content in grain decreased to the same level of that of the control wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1162 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF inoculation accelerated AM colonization successfully”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–765 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest greater AM colonization is a wheat resistance response to ozone.

Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
resistance behavior of wheate0
Qualifier
in response to O3 intimidatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher AM colonization is the resistance behavior of wheat in response to O3 intimidation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1271 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest AMF inoculation promotes wheat growth, root exudates, and soil microbial biomass.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
wheat growth, increase root exudates and soil microbial biomasse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation can accelerate wheat growth, increase root exudates and soil microbial biomass subsequencely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1385 · show in text ↑

ozone · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

58 papers: 14 positive, 44 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

ozone · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

70 papers: 7 positive, 63 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

mycorrhiza · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 58 positive, 7 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 95 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

inoculation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

164 papers: 104 positive, 60 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

160 papers more in this group

See all 164 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 549 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.