Paper · 2009 · Food Science

Effects of Methyl Bromide Fumigation on Storage Quality of Apple and Mangosteen

Wang Yue-jin

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study discussed the effects of methyl bromide fumigation at different dose on the storage quality of apple and mangosteen at 20 ℃.The results showed that the fumigation treatment could inhibit respiration during the treatment and reduce the water loss.However,no significant influence was observed in the flesh hardness and the changes of color were fastened.No significant effect was found on the contents of total soluble sugar in both the two fruit varieties while the total acidity of apple increased and that of mangosteen had no obvious change.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation inhibited respiration during treatment in apple and mangosteen.

Taxon
apple and mangosteenMalus domesticaGarcinia mangostanae0
Treatment
methyl bromide fumigatione0
Outcome
respiratione1
Direction
inhibite1
Setting
20 ℃e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Garcinia mangostana
Garcinia mangostana · TaxonChristine Braaten · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methyl bromide fumigation at different dose on the storage quality of apple and mangosteen at 20 ℃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“the fumigation treatment could inhibit respiration during the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation reduced water loss in apple and mangosteen.

Taxon
apple and mangosteenMalus domesticaGarcinia mangostanae0
Treatment
methyl bromide fumigatione0
Outcome
water losse1
Direction
reducee1
Setting
20 ℃e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Garcinia mangostana
Garcinia mangostana · TaxonChristine Braaten · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methyl bromide fumigation at different dose on the storage quality of apple and mangosteen at 20 ℃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduce the water loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation had no significant effect on flesh hardness.

Taxon
apple and mangosteenMalus domesticaGarcinia mangostanae0
Treatment
methyl bromide fumigatione0
Outcome
flesh hardnesse1
Direction
no significant influencee1
Setting
20 ℃e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Garcinia mangostana
Garcinia mangostana · TaxonChristine Braaten · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methyl bromide fumigation at different dose on the storage quality of apple and mangosteen at 20 ℃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“no significant influence was observed in the flesh hardness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation accelerated color change.

Taxon
apple and mangosteenMalus domesticaGarcinia mangostanae0
Treatment
methyl bromide fumigatione0
Outcome
changes of colore1
Direction
fastenede1
Setting
20 ℃e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Garcinia mangostana
Garcinia mangostana · TaxonChristine Braaten · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methyl bromide fumigation at different dose on the storage quality of apple and mangosteen at 20 ℃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“the changes of color were fastened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation had no significant effect on total soluble sugar content in apple and mangosteen.

Taxon
apple and mangosteenMalus domesticaGarcinia mangostanae0
Treatment
methyl bromide fumigatione0
Outcome
contents of total soluble sugare1
Direction
No significant effecte1
Setting
20 ℃e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Garcinia mangostana
Garcinia mangostana · TaxonChristine Braaten · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methyl bromide fumigation at different dose on the storage quality of apple and mangosteen at 20 ℃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“No significant effect was found on the contents of total soluble sugar in both the two fruit varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation increased total acidity in apple.

Treatment
methyl bromide fumigatione0
Outcome
total aciditye1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
20 ℃e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methyl bromide fumigation at different dose on the storage quality of apple and mangosteen at 20 ℃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“the total acidity of apple increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation did not appreciably change total acidity in mangosteen.

Taxon
mangosteenGarcinia mangostanae0
Treatment
methyl bromide fumigatione0
Outcome
that of mangosteene1
Direction
no obvious changee1
Setting
20 ℃e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Garcinia mangostana
Garcinia mangostana · TaxonChristine Braaten · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methyl bromide fumigation at different dose on the storage quality of apple and mangosteen at 20 ℃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“that of mangosteen had no obvious change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–554 · show in text ↑

bromomethane · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

solarization · physiology: respiration · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

solarization · physiology: osmolytes · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

solarization · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.