Paper · 1990 · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

METHYL BROMIDE, TIME and TEMPERATURE of EXPOSURE ON APPLE QUALITY

S. R. DRAKE; H. R. MOFFITT; J. P. MATTHEIS

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT. The use of methyl bromide (MeBr) as a fumigant to control codling moth in ‘Delicious’apples resulted in a loss of firmness, internal color and therefore a reduction in the amount of acceptable fruit. Time and temperature of MeBr exposure were directly related to firmness and internal color loss. As the exposure time was increased beyond 2 h and exposure temperature above 6°C firmness and internal color loss were accelerated. an 8-day ambient storage period exacerbated firmness and internal color loss as time and temperature of MeBr exposure were increased. A fumigation regime of 56 g MeBr/m3 at 6°C for 2 h resulted in acceptable fruit during a 60 day refrigerated storage period. Increased exposure times or temperatures beyond 56 g MeBr/m3 at 6°C for 2 h resulted in unacceptable firmness and internal color loss, coupled with a major loss in acceptable fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl bromide fumigation against codling moth caused a loss of firmness and internal color in apples.

Treatment
methyl bromide (MeBr) as a fumigante0
Interactor
codling mothCydia pomonellae0pest
Outcome
firmness, internal colore1
Direction
losse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cydia pomonella
Cydia pomonella · InteractorSimon Winkley & Ken Walker, Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“The use of methyl bromide (MeBr) as a fumigant to control codling moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“resulted in a loss of firmness, internal color and therefore a reduction in the amount of acceptable fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl bromide fumigation against codling moth reduced the amount of acceptable apple fruit.

Treatment
methyl bromide (MeBr) as a fumigante0
Interactor
codling mothCydia pomonellae0pest
Outcome
amount of acceptable fruite1
Direction
reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cydia pomonella
Cydia pomonella · InteractorSimon Winkley & Ken Walker, Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“The use of methyl bromide (MeBr) as a fumigant to control codling moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“resulted in a loss of firmness, internal color and therefore a reduction in the amount of acceptable fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–208 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Time and temperature of MeBr exposure co-varied directly with firmness and internal color loss in apples.

Treatment
Time and temperature of MeBr exposuree2
Outcome
firmness and internal color losse2
Direction
increaseinferrede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–65 · show in text ↑
e2

“Time and temperature of MeBr exposure were directly related to firmness and internal color loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposure time beyond 2 h and exposure temperature above 6°C accelerated firmness and internal color loss in apples.

Treatment
exposure time was increased beyond 2 h and exposure temperature above 6°Ce3
Outcome
firmness and internal color losse3
Direction
acceleratede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–65 · show in text ↑
e3

“As the exposure time was increased beyond 2 h and exposure temperature above 6°C firmness and internal color loss were accelerated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An 8-day ambient storage period exacerbated firmness and internal color loss in apples after MeBr exposure.

Treatment
8-day ambient storage periode4
Outcome
firmness and internal color losse4
Direction
exacerbatede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–65 · show in text ↑
e4

“an 8-day ambient storage period exacerbated firmness and internal color loss as time and temperature of MeBr exposure were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A fumigation regime of 56 g MeBr/m3 at 6°C for 2 h gave acceptable apple fruit after 60 days of refrigerated storage.

Treatment
fumigation regime of 56 g MeBr/m3 at 6°C for 2 he5
Outcome
acceptable fruite5
Qualifier
60 day refrigerated storage periode5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–65 · show in text ↑
e5

“A fumigation regime of 56 g MeBr/m3 at 6°C for 2 h resulted in acceptable fruit during a 60 day refrigerated storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposure beyond 56 g MeBr/m3 at 6°C for 2 h caused unacceptable firmness and internal color loss in apples.

Treatment
Increased exposure times or temperatures beyond 56 g MeBr/m3 at 6°C for 2 he6
Outcome
firmness and internal color losse6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–65 · show in text ↑
e6

“Increased exposure times or temperatures beyond 56 g MeBr/m3 at 6°C for 2 h resulted in unacceptable firmness and internal color loss, coupled with a major loss in acceptable fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposure beyond 56 g MeBr/m3 at 6°C for 2 h caused a major loss in acceptable apple fruit.

Treatment
Increased exposure times or temperatures beyond 56 g MeBr/m3 at 6°C for 2 he6
Outcome
acceptable fruite6
Direction
major losse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–65 · show in text ↑
e6

“Increased exposure times or temperatures beyond 56 g MeBr/m3 at 6°C for 2 h resulted in unacceptable firmness and internal color loss, coupled with a major loss in acceptable fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–878 · show in text ↑

bromomethane · Cydia pomonella · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

bromomethane · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

118 papers: 93 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

114 papers more in this group

See all 118 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.