Paper · 2010 · Science and Technology of Food Industry

Effects of phosphine fumigation on quality of apple at different temperature

Wang Yue-jin

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The influence of phosphine fumigation on the respiration and several quality index(the water losing rate,color,firmness,soluble sugar content and total acids)of one apple cultivar(Fuji)at different fumigation temperature was studied.The results showed that phosphine fumigation could inhibit the respiration during fumigation especially at 5℃,reduce rate of lostmass,prolong the storage duration,and would influence the color at different fumigation temperature.There were no significant effects on the soluble sugar content and total acids.However,above 5℃ there was slight decrease of the soluble sugar content when the fumigant dose was increased.Above 10℃ there were evident effects on the total acids between different fumigant doses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphine fumigation inhibited apple respiration, especially at 5℃.

Treatment
phosphine fumigatione0
Outcome
respiratione0
Direction
inhibite0
Qualifier
especially at 5℃e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phosphine fumigation could inhibit the respiration during fumigation especially at 5℃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–342 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphine fumigation reduced apple mass loss rate.

Treatment
phosphine fumigatione1
Outcome
rate of lostmasse0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduce rate of lostmass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–366 · show in text ↑
e1

“phosphine fumigation could inhibit the respiration during fumigation especially at 5℃,reduce rate of lostmass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–366 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphine fumigation prolonged apple storage duration.

Treatment
phosphine fumigatione1
Outcome
storage duratione0
Direction
prolonge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prolong the storage duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–395 · show in text ↑
e1

“phosphine fumigation could inhibit the respiration during fumigation especially at 5℃,reduce rate of lostmass,prolong the storage duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–395 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphine fumigation influenced apple color differently across fumigation temperatures.

Treatment
phosphine fumigatione1
Outcome
colore0
Qualifier
different fumigation temperaturee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“would influence the color at different fumigation temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–461 · show in text ↑
e1

“phosphine fumigation could inhibit the respiration during fumigation especially at 5℃,reduce rate of lostmass,prolong the storage duration,and would influence the color at different fumigation temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–461 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphine fumigation had no significant overall effect on apple soluble sugar content.

Treatment
phosphine fumigatione1
Outcome
soluble sugar contente0
Direction
no significant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant effects on the soluble sugar content and total acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–540 · show in text ↑
e1

“phosphine fumigation could inhibit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–291 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphine fumigation had no significant overall effect on apple total acids.

Treatment
phosphine fumigatione1
Outcome
total acidse0
Direction
no significant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant effects on the soluble sugar content and total acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–540 · show in text ↑
e1

“phosphine fumigation could inhibit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–291 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above 5℃, increasing fumigant dose slightly decreased apple soluble sugar content.

Treatment
fumigant dosee0
Outcome
soluble sugar contente0
Direction
slight decreasee0
Qualifier
above 5℃e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“above 5℃ there was slight decrease of the soluble sugar content when the fumigant dose was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–649 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above 10℃, apple total acids differed evidently between fumigant doses.

Treatment
different fumigant dosese0
Outcome
total acidse0
Qualifier
Above 10℃e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Above 10℃ there were evident effects on the total acids between different fumigant doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑

solarization · physiology: respiration · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

solarization · physiology: osmolytes · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.