Paper · 2011 · He'nan nongye kexue

The Effect of Two Antagonistic Bacteria Fermentation Broth on Apple Preservation

Haiyu Zhang

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The two antagonistic bacteria,Bacillus subtilis T3 and T8,were isolated from the surfaces of fruits and their fermentation broth showed a significant antagonistic effect against Penicillium expansum in vitro.In the experiment,their fermentation broth are applied in apple.The result showed that their fermentation broth can inhibit the expansion of disease area of Expansion penicillin in vivo,the the inhibitory rate are 51% and 46% respectively.Iprodione,chitosan and the bacteria fermentation broth of T3 and T8 are also used in apple preservation.The solublesolids,ascorbic acid content,titratable acidity and the rate of weight loss are measured during the apple preservation.The results showed that the two antagonistic bacteria fermentation broth can hold a higher level of titratable acidity,about 50% and 100% higher than the control respectively but have no obvious effects on other features of apple.Iprodione and chitosan can maintain the higher level of ascorbic acid content during apple storage,chitosan is 700% higher than the control and iprodione is 180%.They can also reduce the rate of weight loss about 20% and 32% lower than the control respectively,but they have no obvious effects on soluble solids during apple storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis T3 broth inhibited expansion of disease on apple with a 51% inhibitory rate.

Treatment
fermentation brothe0
Interactor
Expansion penicilline0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus subtilis T3Bacillus subtilise1biocontrol_agente0
Outcome
expansion of disease areae0
Direction
inhibite0
Value
51%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their fermentation broth can inhibit the expansion of disease area of Expansion penicillin in vivo,the the inhibitory rate are 51% and 46% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–447 · show in text ↑
t0

“The Effect of Two Antagonistic Bacteria Fermentation Broth on Apple Preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The two antagonistic bacteria,Bacillus subtilis T3 and T8,were isolated from the surfaces of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis T8 broth inhibited expansion of disease on apple with a 46% inhibitory rate.

Treatment
fermentation brothe0
Interactor
Expansion penicilline0pathogen
Second interactor
T8e1biocontrol_agente0
Outcome
expansion of disease areae0
Direction
inhibite0
Value
46%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their fermentation broth can inhibit the expansion of disease area of Expansion penicillin in vivo,the the inhibitory rate are 51% and 46% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–447 · show in text ↑
t0

“The Effect of Two Antagonistic Bacteria Fermentation Broth on Apple Preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The two antagonistic bacteria,Bacillus subtilis T3 and T8,were isolated from the surfaces of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 fermentation broth maintained apple titratable acidity about 50% above control.

Treatment
antagonistic bacteria fermentation brothe0
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
highere0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the two antagonistic bacteria fermentation broth can hold a higher level of titratable acidity,about 50% and 100% higher than the control respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“The Effect of Two Antagonistic Bacteria Fermentation Broth on Apple Preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 fermentation broth maintained apple titratable acidity about 100% above control.

Treatment
antagonistic bacteria fermentation brothe0
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
highere0
Value
100%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the two antagonistic bacteria fermentation broth can hold a higher level of titratable acidity,about 50% and 100% higher than the control respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“The Effect of Two Antagonistic Bacteria Fermentation Broth on Apple Preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial broths had no obvious effect on other measured apple features.

Outcome
other featurese0
Direction
no obvious effectse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but have no obvious effects on other features of apple.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“The Effect of Two Antagonistic Bacteria Fermentation Broth on Apple Preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan maintained apple ascorbic acid content at 700% above control.

Treatment
chitosane1
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
700%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iprodione and chitosan can maintain the higher level of ascorbic acid content during apple storage,chitosan is 700% higher than the control and iprodione is 180%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“The Effect of Two Antagonistic Bacteria Fermentation Broth on Apple Preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Iprodione and chitosan can maintain the higher level of ascorbic acid content during apple storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iprodione maintained apple ascorbic acid content at 180% above control.

Treatment
Iprodionee1
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
180%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iprodione and chitosan can maintain the higher level of ascorbic acid content during apple storage,chitosan is 700% higher than the control and iprodione is 180%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“The Effect of Two Antagonistic Bacteria Fermentation Broth on Apple Preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Iprodione and chitosan can maintain the higher level of ascorbic acid content during apple storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan reduced apple weight loss about 20% relative to control.

Treatment
chitosane1
Outcome
rate of weight losse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They can also reduce the rate of weight loss about 20% and 32% lower than the control respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“The Effect of Two Antagonistic Bacteria Fermentation Broth on Apple Preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Iprodione and chitosan can maintain the higher level of ascorbic acid content during apple storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iprodione reduced apple weight loss about 32% relative to control.

Treatment
Iprodionee1
Outcome
rate of weight losse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
32%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They can also reduce the rate of weight loss about 20% and 32% lower than the control respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“The Effect of Two Antagonistic Bacteria Fermentation Broth on Apple Preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Iprodione and chitosan can maintain the higher level of ascorbic acid content during apple storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iprodione and chitosan had no obvious effect on soluble solids during apple storage.

Outcome
soluble solidse0
Direction
no obvious effectse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they have no obvious effects on soluble solids during apple storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“The Effect of Two Antagonistic Bacteria Fermentation Broth on Apple Preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

chitosan · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

processing · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.