Paper · 2015 · Zhongguo yancao kexue

Effeacts of Steam-exploded Tobacco Stalk Substitute Medium on Tobacco Seedlings in Floating System

Zeng Shu-hu

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To study effects of steam-exploded tobacco stalk substitute medium on tobacco seedlings, the seedling test on steamexploded tobacco stalk substitute medium was conducted. The results showed that there were no significant difference in germination rate, stem girth, root number, root fresh and dry weight, chlorophyll content, root activity, or activities of peroxidase(POD) and superoxide dismutase(SOD) between treatments. Planting percentage was higher, and stem height, leaf number and aboveground fresh and dry weight were better than the control. Cost of the substitute medium was 11.88-47.71 yuan/hm2, lower than the control. In conclusion, steam-exploded tobacco stalk can substitute commercial medium in tobacco floating system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination rate, stem girth and root number of tobacco seedlings did not differ significantly between treatments with the steam-exploded tobacco stalk substitute medium.

Treatment
steam-exploded tobacco stalk substitute mediume1
Outcome
germination rate, stem girth, root numbere0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant difference in germination rate, stem girth, root number, root fresh and dry weight, chlorophyll content, root activity, or activities of peroxidase(POD) and superoxide dismutase(SOD) between treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–422 · show in text ↑
e1

“steam-exploded tobacco stalk substitute medium on tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root fresh and dry weight and chlorophyll content of tobacco seedlings did not differ significantly between treatments with the steam-exploded tobacco stalk substitute medium.

Treatment
steam-exploded tobacco stalk substitute mediume1
Outcome
root fresh and dry weight, chlorophyll contente0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant difference in germination rate, stem girth, root number, root fresh and dry weight, chlorophyll content, root activity, or activities of peroxidase(POD) and superoxide dismutase(SOD) between treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–422 · show in text ↑
e1

“steam-exploded tobacco stalk substitute medium on tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root activity and peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities of tobacco seedlings did not differ significantly between treatments with the steam-exploded tobacco stalk substitute medium.

Treatment
steam-exploded tobacco stalk substitute mediume1
Outcome
root activity, or activities of peroxidase(POD) and superoxide dismutase(SOD)e0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant difference in germination rate, stem girth, root number, root fresh and dry weight, chlorophyll content, root activity, or activities of peroxidase(POD) and superoxide dismutase(SOD) between treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–422 · show in text ↑
e1

“steam-exploded tobacco stalk substitute medium on tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting percentage of tobacco seedlings was higher with the steam-exploded tobacco stalk substitute medium than with the control.

Treatment
steam-exploded tobacco stalk substitute mediume1
Outcome
Planting percentagee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting percentage was higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–454 · show in text ↑
e1

“steam-exploded tobacco stalk substitute medium on tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“were better than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem height, leaf number and aboveground fresh and dry weight of tobacco seedlings were better with the substitute medium than with the control.

Treatment
steam-exploded tobacco stalk substitute mediume1
Outcome
stem height, leaf number and aboveground fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem height, leaf number and aboveground fresh and dry weight were better than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–550 · show in text ↑
e1

“steam-exploded tobacco stalk substitute medium on tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cost of the substitute medium was 11.88-47.71 yuan/hm2, lower than the control.

Treatment
substitute mediume0
Outcome
Coste0
Direction
lowere0
Value
11.88-47.71 yuan/hm2e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cost of the substitute medium was 11.88-47.71 yuan/hm2, lower than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–630 · show in text ↑
e1

“steam-exploded tobacco stalk substitute medium on tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that steam-exploded tobacco stalk can substitute commercial medium in the tobacco floating system.

Outcome
can substitute commercial mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“steam-exploded tobacco stalk can substitute commercial medium in tobacco floating system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–735 · show in text ↑

in vitro · physiology: pigments · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

in vitro · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 32 positive, 8 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

in vitro · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

in vitro · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.