Abstract
In order to screen alternative material for peat in floating seedling of flue-cured tobacco, partially. Use the variety K326 to test agronomic traits,photosynthesis,root activity and other aspects of tobacco seedlings for medium mixed carbonized rice husk,moss,perlite,vermiculite and peat in different proportions. The results indicated that :the medium mixed carbonized rice husk and moss were stronger than the commercial medium in germination rate and uniformity,weaker in agronomic traits and photosynthesis rate,but C2(30% perlite+5% vermiculite+30% moss+35% peat) and C1(30% perlite+5% vermiculite+10%moss +55% peat) with no significant difference compared the commercial medium. A3(30% perlite +5% vermiculite +50%carbonized rice husk+15% peat) and C3(30% perlite+5% vermiculite+50% moss+15% peat) were stronger than the control in root activity and morphology. Overall, the potential of moss to substitute peat was greater then carbonized rice husk, but carbonized rice husk was better for development of the tobacco seedlings toot, there's great potential substitute peat.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Medium mixed with carbonized rice husk and moss had stronger germination rate and uniformity than the commercial medium.
- Taxon
- tobacco
Nicotiana tabacumt0 - Treatment
- the medium mixed carbonized rice husk and mosse1
- Outcome
- germination rate and uniformitye1
- Direction
- strongere1
- Comparator
- commercial mediume1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Application of Carbonized Rice Husk and Moss to Tobacco Float Seedling Production”
e1“the medium mixed carbonized rice husk and moss were stronger than the commercial medium in germination rate and uniformity”
Claim · model-written summary
Medium mixed with carbonized rice husk and moss was weaker than the commercial medium in agronomic traits and photosynthesis rate.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt0
- Treatment
- the medium mixed carbonized rice husk and mosse1
- Outcome
- agronomic traits and photosynthesis ratee2
- Direction
- weakere2
- Comparator
- commercial mediume1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Application of Carbonized Rice Husk and Moss to Tobacco Float Seedling Production”
e1“the medium mixed carbonized rice husk and moss were stronger than the commercial medium in germination rate and uniformity”
e2“weaker in agronomic traits and photosynthesis rate”
Claim · model-written summary
Medium C1 showed no significant difference from the commercial medium.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt0
- Treatment
- C1(30% perlite+5% vermiculite+10%moss +55% peat)e3
- Direction
- no significant differencee3
- Comparator
- commercial mediume3
Not reportedOutcome
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Application of Carbonized Rice Husk and Moss to Tobacco Float Seedling Production”
e3“C2(30% perlite+5% vermiculite+30% moss+35% peat) and C1(30% perlite+5% vermiculite+10%moss +55% peat) with no significant difference compared the commercial medium”
Claim · model-written summary
Medium C2 showed no significant difference from the commercial medium.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt0
- Treatment
- C2(30% perlite+5% vermiculite+30% moss+35% peat)e3
- Direction
- no significant differencee3
- Comparator
- commercial mediume3
Not reportedOutcome
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Application of Carbonized Rice Husk and Moss to Tobacco Float Seedling Production”
e3“C2(30% perlite+5% vermiculite+30% moss+35% peat) and C1(30% perlite+5% vermiculite+10%moss +55% peat) with no significant difference compared the commercial medium”
Claim · model-written summary
Medium A3 had stronger root activity and morphology than the control.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt0
- Treatment
- A3(30% perlite +5% vermiculite +50%carbonized rice husk+15% peat)e4
- Outcome
- root activity and morphologye4
- Direction
- strongere4
- Comparator
- controle4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Application of Carbonized Rice Husk and Moss to Tobacco Float Seedling Production”
e4“A3(30% perlite +5% vermiculite +50%carbonized rice husk+15% peat) and C3(30% perlite+5% vermiculite+50% moss+15% peat) were stronger than the control in root activity and morphology”
Claim · model-written summary
Medium C3 had stronger root activity and morphology than the control.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt0
- Treatment
- C3(30% perlite+5% vermiculite+50% moss+15% peat)e4
- Outcome
- root activity and morphologye4
- Direction
- strongere4
- Comparator
- controle4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Application of Carbonized Rice Husk and Moss to Tobacco Float Seedling Production”
e4“A3(30% perlite +5% vermiculite +50%carbonized rice husk+15% peat) and C3(30% perlite+5% vermiculite+50% moss+15% peat) were stronger than the control in root activity and morphology”
Claim · model-written summary
Moss had greater potential than carbonized rice husk to substitute peat.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt0
- Treatment
- mosse5
- Outcome
- substitute peate5
- Direction
- greatere5
- Comparator
- carbonized rice huske5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Application of Carbonized Rice Husk and Moss to Tobacco Float Seedling Production”
e5“the potential of moss to substitute peat was greater then carbonized rice husk, but carbonized rice husk was better for development of the tobacco seedlings toot”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbonized rice husk was better than moss for development of tobacco seedling roots.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt0
- Treatment
- carbonized rice huske5
- Outcome
- development of the tobacco seedlings toote5
- Direction
- bettere5
- Comparator
- mosse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Application of Carbonized Rice Husk and Moss to Tobacco Float Seedling Production”
e5“the potential of moss to substitute peat was greater then carbonized rice husk, but carbonized rice husk was better for development of the tobacco seedlings toot”
The same questions in other papers
Oryza sativa · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →in vitro · physiology: photosynthesis · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
in vitro · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →growing medium · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.