Paper · 2013 · Journal of the South China Agricultural University

Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and Metabolic Enzyme Activities of Flue-Cured Tobacco

Liu Chaok

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of planting density and N application on the yield,photosynthetic characteristics and enzyme activities of tobacco. The results showed that: 1) Planting density and N had a positive interaction with shoot biomass; 2) Planting density,N and planting density × N had no effects on chlorophyll a,chlorophyll b and carotenoids content. Photosynthetic rate had no difference between high and medium density,which was higher than that of low density.Under the condition of high density,the photosynthetic rate of high N was higher than that of medium and low N treatment. Under the condition of medium density,photosynthetic rate at medium N had no difference compared with that at either low or high N. Photosynthetic rate at high N was higher than that at medium N,and photosynthetic rate at low N had no difference with that at medium or high N. Under the condition of low density,photosynthetic rate at high N was lower than that at low N,but photosynthetic rate at medium N had no difference compared with that at either low or high N; 3) Planting density and N had a significant impact on nitrate reductase activities and amylase activities at growing and maturing stages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting density and nitrogen had a positive interaction with tobacco shoot biomass.

Treatment
Planting density and Ne0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting density and N had a positive interaction with shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting density, nitrogen, and their interaction had no effects on chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, or carotenoid contents.

Treatment
Planting density,N and planting density × Ne0
Outcome
chlorophyll a,chlorophyll b and carotenoids contente0
Direction
no effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting density,N and planting density × N had no effects on chlorophyll a,chlorophyll b and carotenoids content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco photosynthetic rate was similar at high and medium density and higher than at low density.

Treatment
high and medium densitye0
Outcome
Photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
low densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rate had no difference between high and medium density,which was higher than that of low density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high density, high nitrogen produced higher photosynthetic rate than medium and low nitrogen.

Treatment
high Ne0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
high densitye0
Comparator
medium and low N treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the condition of high density,the photosynthetic rate of high N was higher than that of medium and low N treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At medium density, medium nitrogen photosynthetic rate did not differ from low or high nitrogen.

Treatment
medium Ne0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
no differencee0
Qualifier
medium densitye0
Comparator
low or high Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the condition of medium density,photosynthetic rate at medium N had no difference compared with that at either low or high N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low density, high nitrogen produced lower photosynthetic rate than low nitrogen.

Treatment
high Ne0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
low densitye0
Comparator
low Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the condition of low density,photosynthetic rate at high N was lower than that at low N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting density and nitrogen significantly affected tobacco nitrate reductase and amylase activities at growing and maturing stages.

Organ / stage
growing and maturing stagese0
Treatment
Planting density and Ne0
Outcome
nitrate reductase activities and amylase activitiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting density and N had a significant impact on nitrate reductase activities and amylase activities at growing and maturing stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–144 · show in text ↑

in vitro · physiology: photosynthesis · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 14 positive, 9 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.