Abstract
During an eight-year investigation under dryland conditions on a red sandy soil of pH 6, NPK (67.2kg N, 44.4kg each of P and K/ha) application resulted in increased grain yield (12.3q/ha), but NP (67.2kg N/ha) gave similar grain yields (11.4 and 10.5q/ha respectively). It was profitable to apply only N, at 67.2kg/ha, since the further increase in financial return with NPK was small
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
NPK application increased finger millet grain yield to 12.3 q/ha, compared with NP (67.2 kg N/ha).
- Taxon
- finger millet
Eleusine coracanat0 - Treatment
- NPK (67.2kg N, 44.4kg each of P and K/ha) applicatione1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 12.3q/hae1
- Comparator
- NP (67.2kg N/ha)e2
- Setting
- dryland conditions on a red sandy soil of pH 6e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainfed finger millet”
e1“NPK (67.2kg N, 44.4kg each of P and K/ha) application resulted in increased grain yield (12.3q/ha)”
e2“but NP (67.2kg N/ha) gave similar grain yields”
e3“under dryland conditions on a red sandy soil of pH 6”
Claim · model-written summary
NP (67.2 kg N/ha) gave finger millet grain yields similar to NPK application (11.4 and 10.5 q/ha).
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- NP (67.2kg N/ha)e2
- Outcome
- grain yieldse2
- Direction
- similare2
- Value
- 11.4 and 10.5q/hae2
- Comparator
- NPK (67.2kg N, 44.4kg each of P and K/ha) applicatione1
- Setting
- dryland conditions on a red sandy soil of pH 6e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainfed finger millet”
e1“NPK (67.2kg N, 44.4kg each of P and K/ha) application”
e2“but NP (67.2kg N/ha) gave similar grain yields (11.4 and 10.5q/ha respectively)”
e3“under dryland conditions on a red sandy soil of pH 6”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying only N at 67.2 kg/ha was profitable for finger millet, because the further financial return from adding P and K was small.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- apply only N, at 67.2kg/hae4
- Outcome
- profitablee4
- Qualifier
- the further increase in financial return with NPK was smalle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainfed finger millet”
e4“It was profitable to apply only N, at 67.2kg/ha”
e5“the further increase in financial return with NPK was small”
The same questions in other papers
nanoparticle · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
15 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →potassium · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →phosphorus · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →nitrogen · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
170 papers more in this group
See all 174 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.