Paper · 1988 · Madras Agricultural Journal

SOIL TEST CROP RESPONSE. STUDIES WITH ORGANIC AND INORGANIC NUTRIENTS-FINGER MILLET (Eleusine coracane G.)

RANI PERUMAL; BASKARAN S; DURAISAMY P; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A soil test crop response trial was conducted on Inceptisol (mixed black-typic usti- vertept) in Tamil Nadu Agricultural University farm, Coimbatore with finger millet Co. 11 (Eleusine coracone G.) and the comparative efficiency of different levels of organic and inorganic nutrients and their impact on yield, uptake and their efficiency have been studied. The effect of fertilizers indicated that grain and straw yields of finger millet were increased significantly upto 60 kg N and 20 kg P,O./ha. while K application had no significant influence on grain yield Organic manure incorporation enhanced the yield. The uptake was also enhanced considerably by the application of organic and inorganic nutrients. Added fertilizer nutrients and its positive effect in enhancing the fertilizer use efficiency recovery and economy were weli manifested at lower levels, while organic nutrients showed such effect only at higher evels of nutrients.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer significantly increased finger millet grain and straw yields up to the stated rates.

Taxon
FINGER MILLETEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
60 kg N and 20 kg P,O./ha.e0
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
60 kg N and 20 kg P,O./ha.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain and straw yields of finger millet were increased significantly upto 60 kg N and 20 kg P,O./ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“FINGER MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium application had no significant influence on grain yield.

Taxon
FINGER MILLETEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
K applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
no significant influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K application had no significant influence on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–563 · show in text ↑
t0

“FINGER MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure incorporation enhanced yield.

Taxon
FINGER MILLETEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Organic manure incorporatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic manure incorporation enhanced the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“FINGER MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic and inorganic nutrient applications enhanced nutrient uptake.

Taxon
FINGER MILLETEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
application of organic and inorganic nutrientse0
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake was also enhanced considerably by the application of organic and inorganic nutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“FINGER MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added fertilizer nutrients improved fertilizer use efficiency, recovery, and economy at lower levels.

Taxon
FINGER MILLETEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Added fertilizer nutrientse0
Outcome
fertilizer use efficiency recovery and economye0
Direction
enhancinge0
Qualifier
at lower levelse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Added fertilizer nutrients and its positive effect in enhancing the fertilizer use efficiency recovery and economy were weli manifested at lower levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“FINGER MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic nutrients improved fertilizer use efficiency, recovery, and economy only at higher levels.

Taxon
FINGER MILLETEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
organic nutrientse0
Outcome
such effecte0
Qualifier
only at higher evels of nutrientse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic nutrients showed such effect only at higher evels of nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“FINGER MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 171 positive, 3 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.