Abstract
Bed planting with urea super granule (USG) application of rice production systems is very new and research on it is still at an introductory phase. Impact of granular urea application on growth and yield of transplanted aman rice as well as evaluation of water and fertilizer use efficiency of rice-fallow-rice cropping system was investigated under raised bed cultivation method. Result showed that the USG in bed planting method increased grain yield of transplanted aman rice up to 12.32% over prilled urea (PU) broadcasting in conventional method. The USG application in bed planting method increased the number of panicle m-2, number of grains panicle-1 and 1000-grains weight of rice than the PU in conventional method. Sterility percentage and weed infestation were lower at USG application in bed planting method than the PU in conventional method. Forty percent irrigation water and time for application could be saved through the USG in bed planting than the PU broadcasting in conventional method. Water use efficiency for grain and biomass production was higher by the USG application in bed planting than the PU broadcasting in conventional method. Likewise, agronomic efficiency of the USG in bed planting was higher than the PU broadcasting in conventional method. This study concluded that the USG in bed planting method is a new approach to get better fertilizer and water use efficiency as well as higher yield compared to the existing agronomic practice in the world.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
USG in raised beds increased transplanted aman rice grain yield by up to 12.32% versus conventional prilled urea.
Verbatim
e0“the USG in bed planting method increased grain yield of transplanted aman rice up to 12.32% over prilled urea (PU) broadcasting in conventional method.”
Claim · model-written summary
USG in raised beds increased panicle number per square metre versus conventional prilled urea.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- USG application in bed planting methode0
- Outcome
- number of panicle m-2e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- PU in conventional methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The USG application in bed planting method increased the number of panicle m-2, number of grains panicle-1 and 1000-grains weight of rice than the PU in conventional method.”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa)”
Claim · model-written summary
USG in raised beds increased grains per panicle versus conventional prilled urea.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- USG application in bed planting methode0
- Outcome
- number of grains panicle-1e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- PU in conventional methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The USG application in bed planting method increased the number of panicle m-2, number of grains panicle-1 and 1000-grains weight of rice than the PU in conventional method.”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa)”
Claim · model-written summary
USG in raised beds increased 1000-grain weight versus conventional prilled urea.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- USG application in bed planting methode0
- Outcome
- 1000-grains weight of ricee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- PU in conventional methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The USG application in bed planting method increased the number of panicle m-2, number of grains panicle-1 and 1000-grains weight of rice than the PU in conventional method.”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa)”
Claim · model-written summary
USG in raised beds lowered rice sterility percentage versus conventional prilled urea.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- USG application in bed planting methode0
- Outcome
- Sterility percentagee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- PU in conventional methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sterility percentage and weed infestation were lower at USG application in bed planting method than the PU in conventional method.”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa)”
Claim · model-written summary
USG in raised beds lowered weed infestation versus conventional prilled urea.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- USG application in bed planting methode0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- weed infestatione0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- PU in conventional methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sterility percentage and weed infestation were lower at USG application in bed planting method than the PU in conventional method.”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa)”
Claim · model-written summary
USG in raised beds saved forty percent of irrigation water versus conventional prilled urea.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- USG in bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- irrigation watere0
- Direction
- savede0
- Value
- Forty percente0
- Comparator
- PU broadcasting in conventional methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Forty percent irrigation water and time for application could be saved through the USG in bed planting than the PU broadcasting in conventional method.”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa)”
Claim · model-written summary
USG in raised beds saved application time versus conventional prilled urea.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- USG in bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- time for applicatione0
- Direction
- savede0
- Comparator
- PU broadcasting in conventional methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Forty percent irrigation water and time for application could be saved through the USG in bed planting than the PU broadcasting in conventional method.”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa)”
Claim · model-written summary
USG in raised beds increased water-use efficiency for grain production versus conventional prilled urea.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- USG application in bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- Water use efficiency for graine0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- PU broadcasting in conventional methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Water use efficiency for grain and biomass production was higher by the USG application in bed planting than the PU broadcasting in conventional method.”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa)”
Claim · model-written summary
USG in raised beds increased water-use efficiency for biomass production versus conventional prilled urea.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- USG application in bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- biomass productione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- PU broadcasting in conventional methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Water use efficiency for grain and biomass production was higher by the USG application in bed planting than the PU broadcasting in conventional method.”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa)”
Claim · model-written summary
USG in raised beds increased agronomic efficiency versus conventional prilled urea.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- USG in bed plantinge0
- Outcome
- agronomic efficiencye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- PU broadcasting in conventional methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“agronomic efficiency of the USG in bed planting was higher than the PU broadcasting in conventional method.”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa)”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
82 papers more in this group
See all 86 papers →tillage · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →nitrogen · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →nitrogen · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →tillage · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
258 papers more in this group
See all 262 papers →tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
725 papers more in this group
See all 729 papers →nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
2,041 papers more in this group
See all 2,045 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.