Paper · 2010

Effects of Continuous No-Tillage on Crop Yield and Soil Fertility in Double Rice Cropping System

Jianfu Wu; Xiaohua Pan; Wang Lu; et al.

17
claims
36
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】 Continuous no-tillage effects on crop yield and soil fertility in double rice cropping system were studied in order to provide valuable references to technique selection of soil management and rice cast-transplantation for this cropping system in South China. 【Method】 No-tillage with cast-transplanting has been conducted in paddy field with double rice cropping system since 2005 in Nanchang city, Jiangxi Province. Crop yield and soil fertility indexes, such as density, porosity, water retention property, nutrient, microbe and enzymes activities were simultaneously determined in this study.【Result】 The early and later rice grain yield were 2.70% and 1.87% higher than that under conventional tillage, respectively, under no-tillage treatment of one and two years (four crops), but crop yield in different treatments was not different significantly. As the time of no-tillageprolonged,early and later rice grain yield decreased, particularly no-tillage of five years decreased by 9.16% and 12.56%. The no-tillage treatment of one year (two crops) improved soil physical properties, but as the time of no-tillage prolonged, worsened soil physical properties, the density was 1.68%-8.01% higher than that under conventional tillage,and the porosity decreased by 0.69%-4.48%,and non-capillary porosity decreased by 15.42%-37.92%. The no-tillage treatment helped nutrient enrichment in the surface soil layer, but decreased soil water retention property. Soil analysis showed that the no-tillage field was less than the control, plowed field in total amount of three groups of soil microbes. However, in no-tillage field, the amount of soil bacteria increased, while that of soil actinomyces and fungi decreased, and urease activity in surface layer soil increased. Significant positive correlations were observed in soil organic matter and total N with urease, catalase and polyphenol oxidase activity. Significant positive correlations of soil total N and available K with peroxidase activity were also obsearved. 【Conclusion】 In comparison to conventional tillage, crop yield in no-tillage treatment of one and two years (four crops) was not differ significantly, no-tillage treatment of one year improved soil physical properties, but as the time of no-tillage prolonged, worsened soil physical properties, early and late rice grain yield decreased. The no-tillage treatment helped nutrient enrichment in the surface soil layer, but decreased soil water-retention property. In no-tillage field, the amount of soil bacteria increased, while that of soil actinomyces and fungi decreased, and urease activity in surface layer soil increased.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early rice grain yield was 2.70% higher under one to two years of no-tillage than conventional tillage.

Treatment
no-tillage treatment of one and two years (four crops)e0
Outcome
early and later rice grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.70%e0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The early and later rice grain yield were 2.70% and 1.87% higher than that under conventional tillage, respectively, under no-tillage treatment of one and two years (four crops)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Later rice grain yield was 1.87% higher under one to two years of no-tillage than conventional tillage.

Treatment
no-tillage treatment of one and two years (four crops)e0
Outcome
later rice grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.87%e0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The early and later rice grain yield were 2.70% and 1.87% higher than that under conventional tillage, respectively, under no-tillage treatment of one and two years (four crops)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five years of no-tillage decreased early rice grain yield by 9.16%.

Treatment
no-tillage of five yearse0
Outcome
early and later rice grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
9.16%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early and later rice grain yield decreased, particularly no-tillage of five years decreased by 9.16% and 12.56%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five years of no-tillage decreased later rice grain yield by 12.56%.

Treatment
no-tillage of five yearse0
Outcome
later rice grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
12.56%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early and later rice grain yield decreased, particularly no-tillage of five years decreased by 9.16% and 12.56%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One year of no-tillage improved paddy soil physical properties.

Treatment
no-tillage treatment of one year (two crops)e0
Outcome
soil physical propertiese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The no-tillage treatment of one year (two crops) improved soil physical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–96 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer no-tillage worsened paddy soil physical properties.

Treatment
no-tillagee0
Outcome
soil physical propertiese0
Direction
worsenede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The no-tillage treatment of one year (two crops) improved soil physical properties, but as the time of no-tillage prolonged, worsened soil physical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage increased soil density by 1.68%-8.01% over conventional tillage.

Treatment
no-tillagee1
Outcome
densitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.68%-8.01%e0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the density was 1.68%-8.01% higher than that under conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“The no-tillage treatment of one year (two crops)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage decreased soil porosity by 0.69%-4.48%.

Treatment
no-tillagee1
Outcome
porositye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.69%-4.48%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the porosity decreased by 0.69%-4.48%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“The no-tillage treatment of one year (two crops)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage decreased non-capillary porosity by 15.42%-37.92%.

Treatment
no-tillagee1
Outcome
non-capillary porositye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
15.42%-37.92%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non-capillary porosity decreased by 15.42%-37.92%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“The no-tillage treatment of one year (two crops)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage enriched nutrients in surface soil.

Treatment
no-tillage treatmente0
Outcome
nutrient enrichment in the surface soil layere0
Direction
enrichmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The no-tillage treatment helped nutrient enrichment in the surface soil layer, but decreased soil water retention property.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage decreased soil water retention.

Treatment
No-Tillaget1
Outcome
soil water retention propertye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased soil water retention property”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–96 · show in text ↑
t1

“Continuous No-Tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The total amount of three soil microbial groups was lower in no-tillage than plowed fields.

Treatment
no-tillage fielde0
Outcome
total amount of three groups of soil microbese0
Direction
less thane0
Comparator
control, plowed fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the no-tillage field was less than the control, plowed field in total amount of three groups of soil microbes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1604 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil bacteria increased in no-tillage fields.

Treatment
no-tillage fielde0
Outcome
amount of soil bacteriae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In no-tillage field, the amount of soil bacteria increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2492–2550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil actinomyces and fungi decreased in no-tillage fields.

Treatment
No-Tillaget1
Outcome
soil actinomyces and fungie0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, in no-tillage field, the amount of soil bacteria increased, while that of soil actinomyces and fungi decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–96 · show in text ↑
t1

“Continuous No-Tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface soil urease activity increased in no-tillage fields.

Treatment
No-Tillaget1
Outcome
urease activity in surface layer soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, in no-tillage field, the amount of soil bacteria increased, while that of soil actinomyces and fungi decreased, and urease activity in surface layer soil increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1779 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–96 · show in text ↑
t1

“Continuous No-Tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–32 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic matter and total N correlated positively with urease, catalase and polyphenol oxidase activity.

Compound
total Ne0
Outcome
urease, catalase and polyphenol oxidase activitye0
Direction
positive correlationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant positive correlations were observed in soil organic matter and total N with urease, catalase and polyphenol oxidase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1780–1916 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–96 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil total N and available K correlated positively with peroxidase activity.

Compound
total Ne0
Outcome
peroxidase activitye0
Direction
positive correlationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant positive correlations of soil total N and available K with peroxidase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1918–2008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–96 · show in text ↑

tillage · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 20 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

tillage · soil: physics · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 35 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

tillage · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 40 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 98 positive, 10 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.