Paper · 2010 · Acta Horticulturae

IN VITRO ROOTING AND HARDENING IN APPLE ROOTSTOCK EMLA111 - INFLUENCE OF SOME FACTORS

M. Modgil; R. Gupta; M. Thakur

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An efficient and reliable procedure for rooting and hardening of in vitro raised shoots of EMLA111 has been developed. Influence of different concentrations of IBA/NAA, solid/liquid medium, role of dark/light treatment and phloroglucinol (PG) was seen on rooting. Nearly 75% rooting was obtained on 1/2 MS with 0.1-0.5 mg/L IBA, 2% sucrose and 0.4% agar in one step method. However, successful rooting was related to the exposure of shoots to IBA for few days followed by transfer to auxin free media (two step method). A synergistic effect of IBA and phloroglucinol in light on rooting was observed. Rooted plantlets were successfully transferred to coco-peat for acclimatization. The hardened plants were transferred to open field conditions at different locations. Ninety-five to 100 percent success was found in March-April and September-November.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The procedure for rooting and hardening in vitro shoots was described as efficient and reliable.

Material
EMLA111e0
Outcome
efficient and reliable procedure for rooting and hardeninge0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE ROOTSTOCK EMLA111”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“An efficient and reliable procedure for rooting and hardening of in vitro raised shoots of EMLA111 has been developed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One step rooting reached nearly 75% on half strength MS with IBA, sucrose and agar.

Material
EMLA111t0
Treatment
1/2 MS with 0.1-0.5 mg/L IBA, 2% sucrose and 0.4% agare0
Outcome
rootinge0
Value
75%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE ROOTSTOCK EMLA111”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nearly 75% rooting was obtained on 1/2 MS with 0.1-0.5 mg/L IBA, 2% sucrose and 0.4% agar in one step method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–372 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Successful rooting was associated with brief IBA exposure followed by auxin free medium.

Material
EMLA111t0
Treatment
exposure of shoots to IBA for few days followed by transfer to auxin free mediae0
Outcome
successful rootinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE ROOTSTOCK EMLA111”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“successful rooting was related to the exposure of shoots to IBA for few days followed by transfer to auxin free media (two step method)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–518 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA and phloroglucinol acted synergistically on rooting in light.

Treatment
IBA and phloroglucinol in lighte0
Outcome
rootinge0
Direction
synergistice0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE ROOTSTOCK EMLA111”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“A synergistic effect of IBA and phloroglucinol in light on rooting was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–599 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rooted plantlets were successfully acclimatized in coco-peat.

Material
EMLA111t0
Outcome
successfully transferred to coco-peat for acclimatizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE ROOTSTOCK EMLA111”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rooted plantlets were successfully transferred to coco-peat for acclimatization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–680 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hardened plants were transferred to open field conditions.

Outcome
transferred to open field conditionse0
Setting
open field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE ROOTSTOCK EMLA111”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“The hardened plants were transferred to open field conditions at different locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–766 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Success in March-April and September-November was 95 to 100 percent.

Outcome
successe0
Value
Ninety-five to 100 percente0
Qualifier
March-April and September-Novembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE ROOTSTOCK EMLA111”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ninety-five to 100 percent success was found in March-April and September-November”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–850 · show in text ↑

phloroglucinol · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

sucrose · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

agar · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

light · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 20 positive, 12 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.